On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 1:52:47 AM EST Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix- users wrote: > * Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users <post...@kitterman.com>: > > ... > > > > For Debian, if someone can find/test patches, I can get them into Debian's > > package. I assume other distributors are similar. Feel free to update > > the Debian bug with information. It's unfortunate we don't have a better > > maintained solution. > > In Germany the German government is preparing an initiative to foster open > source projects that are considered to be vital for e.g. the security of > people when they are on the internet. > > At eco e.v., Germanies lobby organization for businesses on the internet, > we are currently investigating if opendkim and opendmarc could receive > grant from the government. > > openspf, opendkim and opendmarc have been very useful when the IETF created > the RFCs, because you need "rough consensus and running code", and the > programs always served to provide the latter, but then, after they had > become the de facto standard applications, no one took on the task of > "software gardening" and so bugs that had been discovered did not get fixed > and new functionality has not been added. That's one of the reasons it has > become harder to run a modern mail platform on your own if you are not a > major player.
That would be great. I started dkimpy-milter for two reasons: I wanted to experiment with the new DKIM crypto types that lead to RFC 8463 and there didn't seem to be much activity with opendkim maintenance (this is, of course, ironic given how well I did with dkimpy-milter maintence recently). I did finally get a new release out recently and as far as I can tell with the updates to pymilter, dkimpy, and dkimpy-milter the crashes from non-ASCII/ UTF-8 data are a ting of the past (if someone knows otherwise, please file bugs). Scott K _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
