I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0.
I have not used DKIM in previous postfix installs, but I would like to
start now with the new google rules.
I have done some research and opendkim is the most recommended, however,
other research states the opendkim has been abandoned by it's mainta
I have noticed in most deliveries, servers are issuing two ehlo commands. For
example:
postfix/smtpd[232271]: disconnect from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.105.223]
ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=7
Is this an indication that something might not be configured correctly to
that would
alter anything postfix tried sending to root of localhost.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Trouble Shooting Areas
==
Make sure mydestination contains localhost for postfix to know it gets
delivered locally.
Also double check myhostname, mydomain, and myorigin for anything that doesn't
look right.
Make sure nothing in /etc/aliases is sending root somewhere
I tried with debug_peer_list and debug_peer_level, but it looked like not all
commands are included
Did you increase the level higher than 2?
debug_peer_level = 5 should show all SMTP commands issued.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users
If I use the hash metod and follow https://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
I should write the config file like
/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd:
# Per-sender authentication; see also /etc/postfix/sender_relay.
us...@example.com username1:password1
us...@example.net
he
levels.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
To be honest, you still likely want authentication. Keep in mind that you
don't need to authenticate as a single user for roundcube but rather you can
have roundcube pass authentication through from it's own user login and
therefore support multiple users while also allowing
does smtp have an action "discard"? if so where messages will be discarded?
I see smtp code has "reject" while sieve has "discard". So I am asking this
question.
http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
There is a DISCARD action.
_____
. People
will do sender callout and then reject all e-mail with this as sender.
An option is to have noreply@ delivered to /dev/null. It's valid and a trash
can.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
sistent on having the HELO be
something other than the hostname?
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
what's the main difference between a policy server and a milter?
Policy Server:
- Coded quickly in scripting language
- Lightweight, simple, and fast to setup
- Is only provided limited header information by postfix for evaluating
Milter:
- More complicated to setup and code
Im sure the answer is NO, but you don't know if you don't ask.
Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking the
milters during the rcpt-to stage?
My end goal is trying to track the email, so logic in the milter during the
rcpt-to stage can have a header adde
Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking the
milters during the rcpt-to stage?
smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt = no
Thanks.
No wonder i couldn't find it by searching for Queue Id in the docs. I didn't
think to search f
> Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking
> the milters during the rcpt-to stage?
smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt = no
Almost: the RCPT TO is valid AFTER the Milter accepts it.
Wietse
I don't understand what you mean by that.
I did a te
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]: E53B5103176:
from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:29:01.124528+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/smtp[4038]: E53B5103176:
to=, orig_to=,
relay=mail.gandi.net[2001:4b98:e00::9]:587, delay=0.19, delays=0/
Spaces are not allowed in submission -o override settings.
How do you handle adding a service? Or is it not possible? Can you \ the space?
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=check_policy_service\ unix:private/myservice
___
Postfix-users mailing list
offline? You have two ways to do this.
You can setup server B as a relay server, it doesn't have any inboxes. You have
to replicate a list of valid users on server B. Postfix would then accept email
for those users and then try to relay (redeliver) that email to server A to be
stored in the u
Is it true that the Queue-ID is generated before Postfix receives the
message content? After which SMTP command?
By default during the RCPT TO stage. But can be changed to happen earlier
during the MAIL FROM stage with performance trade offs.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
efore Postfix receives the
message content? After which SMTP command?
This is vague for me, so im going to make a leap in assumptions.
First did you turn on enable_long_queue_ids to give you better uniqueness
since ID's will be important to you?
Then using omprog, first look for and
People who actually use Dovecot for submission might know.
I'm not even sure whether Dovecot's submission facility ever talks to
Postfix.
Dovecot doesn't "perform" submission services. It is only a proxy to postfix
submission (or other).
https://doc.dov
ssue is, and i hope im wording this right. Let's say the
server's hostname is example1.com and you have additionally added
example2.com to 'mydestination'.
Email comes in for u...@example2.com, domain matches mydestination, postfix
accepts delivery. Postfix goes to stuff
I never have the "X-Original-To:" header added to emails received over
port 25 sent to an alias.
how do you deliver mail to mailboxes?
LMTP to dovecot
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send a
happens between these two stages?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
/aliases?
And would "X-Original-To:" be added before or after the milters run?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
If you use the "lmtp" delivery agent for delivery to Dovecot:
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
lmtp .. .. .. .. .. ... lmtp
flags=DORX
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
# Here "lmtp" is the name of the first field in master.cf.
lmtp_destination_recipie
I need to find out if an outgoing message was successfully delivered or not.
I know this can be achieved by setting up some filesystem watcher for the
logfile, and/or by having a cronjob searching through the logfile for the
line containing `status=`.
But it would be so much nicer if Postfix
I have policyd-spf and opendkim (as a milter) installed for postfix.
How can I customize the policy that, if an incoming message has SPF failed
AND has invalid DKIM then this message will be rejected? AFAIK google has
this kind of rejection policy for their gmail.
That is what DMARC does
I see both postfix and dovecot can set the limit for mailbox size and message
size.
So which to set it as the better way? or both?
By which ever one is delivering the mail to drive. Depends how you have your
system setup.
Additionally I am not sure if postfix allows for per user control or
ostfix.org
...
ServerName www.postfix.org
ServerAlias postfix.org
...
And like Victor said, add the domain root to the SSL cert.
This is all less than 5 minutes of banging on the keyboard.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To u
to be, then no. The SMTP/email transaction was aborted before they
ever had the chance to tell your server who (From:) or to whom (To:) the
email was going to be for.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an
ed locally.
Yes, this is what I meant, sorry I didn't word it better or acknowledge
there's more than one way to get an email "in" other than submission. "leaves
the system" is what i meant when saying "on its way out to the world".
smtpd_hide_session_info (default: no)
Hide SMTP session info from the Received: message header. Do not
record the SMTP client name or IP address, SASL login name, or TLS
session details. This reduces the Received: header from:
Received: from
by servername (Postfix) with id
-o { smtp_header_checks = pcre:{{/^Received:/ IGNORE}} }
I don't know if that is valid syntax. It might need to be done in main
instead of master. Not every postfix setting works in master.
Hopeful someone more knowledgeable can st
Just to double check this isn't a configuration library issue on my end?
Someone is messing around? I have dozens of these repeated in the logs.
Dec 15 23:07:50 host postfix/smtpd[3181]: warning: run-time library vs.
compile-time header version mismatch: OpenSSL 3.2.0 may not be compa
But you did not also upgrade Postfix, which was built with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
Installed Packages
Name : postfix
Epoch: 2
Version : 3.5.25
Release : 1.el9
Architecture : x86_64
Size : 4.4 M
Source : postfix-3.5.25-1.el9.src.rpm
Repository
Repository : ol9_baseos_latest
The warnings are harmless, you can ignore them, if you wish. They
would have been ignored with a later version of Postfix that knows
to expect "minor" OpenSSL updates.
That's good news. I was concerned connections might not happen due to
incompatib
I saw that when messages sent to duck.com for forwarding, duck.com will
remove the original DKIM info from headers, to protect the sender privacy.
I am just curious how to remove that DKIM in postfix?
That is something that can be done in milters. Most likely a custom solution
they built.
I
crypt/live/example.com/privkey.pem
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
Is there something to improve?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
My distro package manager gives me postfix 3.5.25 with openssl 3.2.2 which
causes SSL version mismatch warnings I was previously told I could ignore.
I got a failed transaction:
Jan 21 09:15:21 host postfix/smtpd[79286]: warning: run-time library vs.
compile-time header version mismatch
One way to narrow down trouble shooting to know if its a firewall or config
issue is to check if postfix has bound to the ports for listening.
[root@host /]# netstat -nlp46
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
> The postifx log says:
>
> "RCPT from unknown[202.70.195.135]"
>
> Regardless of the results from dig, doesn't the above log entry mean
> that postfix is unable to find an rdns entry for this IP and that
> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname should be
Greetings:
I'm running several spam-filtering tools including Postgrey,
SpamAssassin, etc. I would like to make replying to mail I have sent
easier.
How can I automatically white-list addresses to whom I have sent email?
Thanks,
Chris
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
How can I automatically white-list addresses to whom I have sent email?
SpamAssassin has "PenPals" for exactly that
you mean amavisd-new?
Ah, yes, I suck. I expect everybody to use amavisd-new to integrate SA
:)
Thanks for all of the advice. I'm
nt on there is spam (at times,
over %90), but certain campaigns will have our customers sifting through
those mountains of spam for accountability purposes, etc.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Joe Postfix:
> > Does anyone know if postfix supports a feature
Hi,
is there a way to rewrite a sender address in dependence of
the recipient?
Example:
sender + recipient = new sender address
--
j...@example.net + j...@example.net = robotforj...@example.net
j...@example.net + = j...@example.net (no change)
Thanks
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a way to rewrite a sender address in
> dependence of
> > the recipient?
> >
> > Example:
> > sender + recipient = new sender address
> > --
> > j...@example.net
> + j...@example.net
> = robotforj...@example.net
> > j...@example.n
Hi,
is there anywhere a format description for the queued-mails?
I'm trying to build my own content_filter, like described in
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html#simple_filter. But the sentence there
(script, line 24) "Specify your content filter here." is not very helpful
without knowi
is runs so actually successful for years.. But I'm
> confident that there must be also a solution to solve the
> problem using only one email-server.
> >
> > Is the problem understandable?
> >
>
> try this:
>
> define a custom smtp transport that has its
Hi, we're trying to setup our Postfix relays to BCC emails to/from specific
users (members of an LDAP group - A/D actually) to a mailbox that logs their
correspondence. I wasnt able to find any mention of this in the online
documentation anywhere - does anyone know of a way to implement some
Thanks!
BTW this link for LDAP lookups works better for me:
http://www.postfix.org/LDAP_README.html#config
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Joe Postfix:
> > Hi, we're trying to setup our Postfix relays to BCC emails to/from
> specific
> > users (m
Hello,
i used to create on-the-fly mail-addresses with "recipient_delimiter"
set to "."
Now, one of those mail-addresses is heavily receiving spam.
As this mail-address is of the form "user@...", cannot just remove
the user "user.sub" from my list of users.
I would like to reject any ma
/dev/rob0 wrote:
But as far as i can tell, this is already quite late in
processing the mails!
Why do you think so?
I seem to remember, that the recipient code technically is called later
- after all headers and maybe even data has been read by the server.
I would like to reject those mail
postfix-us...@tja-server.de schrieb:
/dev/rob0 wrote:
But as far as i can tell, this is already quite late in
processing the mails!
Why do you think so?
I seem to remember, that the recipient code technically is called later
- after all headers and maybe even data has been read by the
Hi,
I am migrating the Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2010, but before we switch over
to new server, I want make a copy of email to new server for testing.
Existing Config:
Postfix -> Amavisd -> Exchange 2000
Here what I want :
Postfix ---> Amavisd -> Exchange 2000
--->
Dear Noel,
Thanks for your reply.
Does it mean on my new Exchange 2010 server, I need to add
"@new.example.com" email address for each recipient?
For example, If I send email to p...@example.com.
After postfix process, it rewrite the email address
p...@new.example.com and delivery
Hello,
i would like to create the following setup for two postfix servers.
The setup:
Server A is the smtp(s) server and the MX record for some domains.
He accepts mail from clients over sasl/tls for delivery to the internet
or to the domains.
He does forward all external mail to Server B
He
Thank you, Noel!
I got that running - mostly :)
Server A (MX, SMTP: smtp.example.com) has:
relay_domains = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
/etc/postfix/mydomains
relay_transport = smtp:[smtp.example.com]
mynetworks = [ip.ad.dr.es], ...
Where /etc/postfix/mydomains lists all
I got caught by that already :-O
My server bounced two mails from the list (having relay_recipient_maps
set up wrongly) - and i have no idea if that was already an answer ...
So, if somebody answered to my last mail, please send it again.
:)
Sorry for that!
postfix-us...@tja-server.de
eject mail to user.s...@example.com while accepting
all other use...@example.com addresses?
So far, i found "recipient_access" to allow this this:
main.cf:
check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_access
/etc/postfix/recipient_access:
/^user\.s...@example\.com$/ REJECT
I
Noel Jones schrieb:
Everything is running fine :)
Thank you!
Ralf Hildebrandt schrieb:
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_access
user.s...@example.com REJECT
Thanx, that is more easy to use :)
Ansgar Wiechers schrieb:
It should work if the FQDN is the FQDN of server B. It shouldn't work if
the FQDN is the FQDN of server A (which was the case in your config
snippet).
Ahh ...
Was too fast to format that stuff, sorry for that!
The default includes all local users of the machine, whic
And finally, to showcase my config, the "postconf -n" outputs, modified
to remove real hostnames and IP-addresses.
A "client" server:
config_directory = /etc/postfix
mydomain = example.com
mynetworks = 127.0.0.1/8
myorigin = $mydomain
relayhost = smtp.example.com
The MX S
Noel Jones schrieb:
This should use $data_directory rather than $queue_directory.
$data_directory must be a directory owned by $mail_owner (default
"postfix") and not used by any other programs. On most systems this
defaults to /var/lib/postfix.
On my systems (Debi
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for safety
reasons.'
Is there a way to bypass this? I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into a
whitelist instead of a blacklist.
Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail that does not match the
desired entries (curre
In the smtpd_client_* section of postconf(5) the word "client" is
used frequently. What does a single "client" entail? If multiple
users are behind a NAT box do they all apear to be a single "client"?
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Security Admin (NetSec) :
Could someone provide links to sites where IP addresses are grouped by
country?
I use (the free) geoip database for that.
This script has proven useful for me...
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/block-entier-country-using-iptables/
(Y
I'm having an issue getting the smtp client to bind to an aliased IP
address.
mail_version = 2.5.7
I've tried to no avail to have the smtp client use a aliased IP to
deliver mail but it insists on using the address of the interface the
aliased address is assigned to.
# ifconfig eth2 && ifconfig
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:28 +0530, ram wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 00:58 -0300, Postfix User wrote:
> > I'm having an issue getting the smtp client to bind to an aliased IP
> > address.
> >
> > mail_version = 2.5.7
> >
> > I've tried to no
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 07:51 -0400, John Peach wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:57:54 -0300
> Postfix User wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > As I've confirmed that it's not, any other suggestions?
>
> Postfix does not decide which interface to use for sending mail. Tha
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 19:10 +0530, ram wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 07:57 -0300, Postfix User wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:28 +0530, ram wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 00:58 -0300, Postfix User wrote:
> > > > I'm having an issue getting the s
> 2009/9/30 Postfix User :
>
> > I've since implemented an iptables SNAT rule as a temporary workaround
> > as I really needed this working this morning. I doubt this will
> > interfere with the verbose logging output. What exactly is it I should
> > be loo
Hello
I have problem with sendmail -bs from postfix 2.9.0. It is killed by
segmentation fault when it is called by for example pine.
More precisely /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd is killed after reading MAIL FROM:
Log from this event:
Feb 16 18:45:34 main postfix/smtpd[15966]: connect from localhost
Hi,
Product:
postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64
We used to use the old vacation package for ages
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vacation/. However since moving to
virtual domains, I've had to move away from this product (as virtual
domains don't support .forward files).
Has anyone el
Hi,
Just after advice, I'm configuring Postfix to work with a Dovecot LMTP
for (Sieve delivery). I want to be 100% certain that if Dovecot stuffs
up in some way, or a user fails to write a correct sieve script, that we
won't loose any mail?
Current configuration (works fine)
Spec
Hello,
Configuration
OS: RHEL 5.3
MTA: mail_version = 2.7.3
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks
cat /etc/postfix/body_checks
/http:\/\/scananida.com.pl\/report.exe/ REJECT
Context
Postfix usually received and delivered emails by in a fews seconds.
Recently I noticed an email having
Hello Viktor
Thank you for your answer.
Pls find my answers inserted.
I changed names and ips.
Rgds
Alain
Le 03/12/13, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:50:45AM +0100, POSTFIX MAIL wrote:
>
> > Oct 29 13:47:39 pf2 postfix/smtpd[22983]:
> > D
16 minutes to go from "RCPT
TO:" to "complete incoming queue writing".
Thanks
Alain
Le 04/12/13, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:24:46PM +0100, POSTFIX MAIL wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your answer.
>
> Please read it carefully
thing like that:
127.0.0.1:27 inet n - n - 2 smtpd
...
-o cleanup_service_name=cleanup-rw
...
3/ finally define the new cleanup service with the rewriting information you
need
something like that:
cleanup-rw unix n - n - 0 cleanup
...
-o recipient_canonical_maps= regexp:/etc/postfix/recipientm
om: alain
I configured Postfix this way:
sender_canonical_classes = header_sender
sender_canonical_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_canonical_regexp
remote_header_rewrite_domain = test.fr
local_header_rewrite_clients =
with sender_canonical_regexp
/^(.*)\(.+\)\s*(.*)$/ ${1}${2}
It did not work as e
Le 03/01/14, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:21:56PM +0100, POSTFIX MAIL wrote:
>
> > Question: Why doesn't it work with the "sender_canonical_maps"
> > configuration?
>
> Header address rewriting applies *only* to the mailbox a
ider this as a offensive remark but as a suggestion ...
Le 03/01/14, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) a écrit :
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:21:56PM +0100, POSTFIX MAIL wrote:
> >
> > > Question: Why doesn't it work with the "sender_canon
Hello my dear Postfix users :)
I got a "new" server, that still runs older software: Debian 6.0.9 with
Postfix 2.7.1
I tried to start anew and tried to get my configuration as small as
possible, with only few changes to the default settings.
I am using "grossd" as greyli
I was suspecting this already:
Mar 25 12:16:56 HOSTNAME postfix/smtpd[6243]: connect from
unknown[180.93.167.227]
Mar 25 12:16:58 HOSTNAME postfix/smtpd[6243]: disconnect from
unknown[180.93.167.227]
Something seems to get through possibly should not?
I have no idea, what i should fix
Yes, this default value also bugged be several times :)
Strange to add a NIS mal by default ...
BTW, i hate that the reply-to is not set to the list :D
chrissko wrote:
The output is indeed a non-root user, but before I run the command you
mentioned, I modified the /etc/main.cf file, so now al
Wietse Venema wrote:
OpenSSL versions prior to 1.0.1 don't
have the hearbeat feature and have never been affected by this bug.
ii openssl
0.9.8o-4squeeze14 Secure Socket
Layer (SSL) binary and related crypto
aster than me, I was already starting to devise some in
> > shell script.
> >
> > Aside of hacks, I *think* that it might make sense to have a
> > non-hacked solution. As system administrators, we, at least I, send
> > quite a number of items with mail (cronjobs).
> > Therefore, IMHVHO, a tool distributed with *nix or *fix (wrapping
> > around mail) might be useful?
> >
>
> There are already: mutt, mpack, metamail, ...
>
>
> (That said, perl and perl modules are available as packages on many
> systems :)
>
>
or just bash and coreutils, http://linuxnet.ca/postfix/attachment
--
possible
since Postfix 2.7 with this entry to change the transport but not the
nexthop:
"... To override the recipient's transport but not the next-hop
destination, specify an empty filter destination ..."
I use postfix 3.5.6-1+b1 (Debian 11).
My postfix has a transport ta
Yes, smtp-sec and smtp-safe is the same (copy paste mistake...)
Thanks for the explanation.
postfix-us...@mattern.org:
and a test header check:
/^Subject: test1test/?? FILTER smtp-sec:
...
Nov 16 13:38:19 mailtest1 postfix/cleanup[1147934]: 5C0D85B05:
filter: header Subject: test1test
Hi all.
Can you please tell me how to pass an environment variable (like
SSLKEYLOGFILE) to the smtpd daemon ? Maybe as an alternative, if the
master process can't allow this, there are examples of running smtpd
directly from systemd ?
Thank you.
master.cf:
# postconf -e "smtpd_impenv = $(postconf -dh import_environment)
SSLKEYLOGFILE=/some/where"
# postconf -Pe 'smtp/inet/import_environment=$smtpd_impenv'
# postfix reload
Use double and single quotes as indicated.
See the postconf(1) manpage, and if you prefer
t_maps and
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps to correctly identify 1.1.1.1 as next
hop. But then, managed by qmgr, smtp takes over and chooses either
4.4.4.1 (relayhost in main.cf) or resolves the next hop via DNS (if no
relayhost in main.cf):
Jul 8 10:29:19 localhost
postfix/submission-rewrite/trivial-rewrite[103626]:
/content_filter =
smtp/inet/mynetworks = /etc/postfix/exo_networks
smtp/inet/smtp_tls_mandatory_ciphers = high
smtp/inet/smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = >=TLSv1.2
smtp/inet/smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
smtp/inet/smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,reject
submission/inet/content_filter =
submiss
Am 08.07.2022 um 21:35 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 09:08:28PM +0200, Postfix-jtroendle wrote:
submission/inet/rewrite_service_name = submission-rewrite
Your mistake is believing that the trivial rewrite service setting in
smtpd(8) can determine message routing. This is
Hello !
I met an issue with milter when multiple messages pushed within single
smtp session (using pipelining indeed):
warning: milter unix:/run/t.socket: unexpected filter response
SMFIR_ADDHEADER after event SMFIC_MAIL
It looks similar for
https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users
/t.socket: unexpected filter response
SMFIR_ADDHEADER after event SMFIC_MAIL
It looks similar for
https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg13652.html
This was caused by a bug in Sendmail::PMilter.
Background: the SMTP protocol supports multiple MAIL transactions
per SMTP
wn user 'unkn...@example.com':
valias: "@example.com @example.com, f...@external.org"
vmailbox: "@example.com example.com/foo/"
This fails: external.org doesn't get the mail, but Dovecot does get the
mail from mailbox 'foo/'.
The mail log at ex
Hello,
Looks like I get listed (again) becouse my conf recjects spam messages
with full body.
What to change in postfix configuration to get reject with my message
only and SPAM message added as eml attachment ?
Sebastian
Hello,
I install postfix3 in Centos 7, I'm used to working with the systemctl
command but I can't administer the service that way. Does anyone have an
example of the configuration to work via systemctl?
Thank you.
Regards,
501 - 600 of 4150 matches
Mail list logo
