s
the message is bounced.
I have tried all that I can think of to resolve this, but to no
avail...
Any help gratefully received.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
Log Output:
Mar 1 08:47:39 ims1 postfix/smtpd[9561]: dict_proxy_lookup:
table=mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf fl
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:26:09 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/1/2011 8:15 AM, Marc L. Veary wrote:
I have nothing in gmail.
Could someone let me know what further info is required?
Kind regards,
--
Marc
[please bottom post on this list]
It's in the archives
http://archives.neohapsi
.c -l
o Delete all messages from MAILER-DAEMON:
for i in `pqgrep.py -s MAILER-DAEMON` ; do postsuper -d $i ; done
Thanks,
Marc
Hi there,
I tested this on RHEL 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 and the PCRE matched correctly.
Cheers,
Marc
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:51:36 +0200, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Steven Redlich:
/http:\/\/baddomain.com\/uTnsub\//
There is no error with this PCRE pattern. It works as expected
on my (non-Redhat
tool, so ideally (and what I still want to implement) the ability to
specify a particular queue to match against would help prevent against
this. Is that a correct assumption?
Thanks again for the feedback...
Marc
Thanks... I better understand Viktor's original reply now.
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:22:25 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
No, that doesn't fix the race condition. Between your scan of the queue
and the actual removal of the message it could be delivered and replaced
by another message with the same qu
here ...
Just one of the cases you might break what user would expect.
Marc
If the LDAP response is not what you want
a) change your filter ; check special_result_attribute
b) change your LDAP (OpenLDAP with overlays?)
Marc
give precedence to the MX records defined for the
domain, but will privilege the internal transport / mapping rules.
Is there anyone out there that could give me a solution to fix this problem?
Thanks!
--
Marc Jauvin
514-905-6500 ext. 403
http://register4less.com
ered "internally" instead of being
sent to his NEW external MX host.
So how can we configure postfix so that it will "realize" that the
mail should be routed to the NEW MX host?
Thanks in advance.
Wietse Venema wrote:
Marc Jauvin:
I've been using Postfix for
cords were modified, then
we can't "remove" those virtual mapping rules from our database.
Is there something I'm missing?
Wietse Venema wrote:
Marc Jauvin:
"virtual" maps. So at this point, if we send this customer an email at
his domain, the email wil
That's what I was afraid of... when you're hosting multi-thousands of
domains, that's not an easy task... :(
Noel Jones wrote:
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I
mean: postfix has no idea if he's supposed t
Hi there,
As far as I'm aware this is easily modified using the "smtpd_banner"
option in main.cf
Cheers,
Marc
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:34:10 +0200, Ashwin Muni
wrote:
Hi ALL,
Just was going through some archives,
Anybody help me how do i achieve ""250-mx.g
Hi everyone,
I'd like to know if there's a way to have different relayhost based on
the MX records of the recipient for outgoing mail. I'd like to relay
outgoing emails to multiple different domains (all going through a
common mail exchange) to a particular relayhost.
T
That works, although I would have liked it to be done within postfix.
Thanks for the suggestion!!!
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:52:27PM -0400, Marc Jauvin wrote:
I'd like to know if there's a way to have different relayhost based on the
MX records of the rec
Wietse Venema wrote:
Marc Jauvin:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to know if there's a way to have different relayhost based on
the MX records of the recipient for outgoing mail. I'd like to relay
outgoing emails to multiple different domains (all going through a
common mail exchange)
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:15:48PM -0400, Marc Jauvin wrote:
Note: using iptables to reroute traffic for Godaddy's IP address does work,
but it's unlikely to work reliably if they change those IP addresses (or
add new ones to the mix).
Well, how would Postf
nd its local_data.
Yes, use a local DNS cache that suppors local name overrides. "unbound"
would be a good choice.
Thanks to all that helped solving my problem. This is now working
perfectly using unbound's "local-data" override. (got rid of bind9
caching server in th
configuring
postfix, mailman and procmail to work together and I can't seem to get
mailman to pay attention to the procmail directives in
/etc/procmailrcs/.
Is there a trick to this? Anyone else have such a setup working?
Thanks!
Marc Taylor
ds, blogs articles but I really can't figure out how to
do this -- even if it is possible !
Thank you for your help, if any of you has a clue about how to do this;
I apologize in advance if this email is hard to understand, my English
isn't perfect, I'll try to explain better if
On 21/03/10 23:11, Wietse Venema wrote:
Marc Falzon:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hello all,
I am currently trying to configure Postfix to route incoming emails
based on email address matching to a daemon I wrote.
Here is the context : I am developing a simple mailing
# start the daemon:
exec libexec/master
Or does postfix do more "magic" on startup I don't know about?
(I don't know postfix very well yet)
Marc Weber
[1] complex fork behaviour traced by strace running postfix start
1290 execve("/-postfix-2.2.11/sbin/postfix",
ssage is bounced.
I have tried all that I can think of to resolve this, but to no avail...
Any help gratefully received.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
*
Log Output:*
Mar 1 08:47:39 ims1 postfix/smtpd[9561]: dict_proxy_lookup:
table=mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf flags=lock|fold_f
ssage is bounced.
I have tried all that I can think of to resolve this, but to no avail...
Any help gratefully received.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
*
Log Output:*
Mar 1 08:47:39 ims1 postfix/smtpd[9561]: dict_proxy_lookup:
table=mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf flags=lock|fold_f
up in the regex/pcre fashion (as far as
I'm aware anyway).
ie:
/yahoo.[a-z]*/ relay:[127.0.0.2]
/test.com/ relay:[127.0.0.3]
[postfix]$ postmap -q "yahoo.com" regexp:/etc/postfix/transport
smtp:[127.0.0.2]
Hope this helps you,
Cheers,
Marc
an expert on this area. So if any statement looks too wrong
correct me, please.
Marc Weber
this same question. Many thanks in advance!
Marc Chamberlin
On 6/5/2011 9:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marc Chamberlin:
>> Hello -
>>
>> I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help
>> configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server.
>> Don't get me wrong on this, Post
to accomplish this task, and I was attempting
to use their terminology to try an explain. So again, if I am misusing
terminology, please forgive me for causing confusion...
Marc Chamberlin
Excerpts from Amira Othman's message of Mon Jul 25 12:17:46 +0200 2011:
> I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6,dovecot-1.2.17-0_115.el5 on centos 5.6.I
Consider upgrading to 2.8. I tried 2.2 in the past and failed. Don't
know whether 2.3.3 works much better.
Marc Weber
Hi list,
I've googled it but am confused by the various responses. What I'd
like seems to be pretty simple - to configure content-filter to be
bypassed if the message originates from localhost.
If anyone has a simple way to achieve this I'd appreciate the advice.
Cheers
Marc
Hi,
I have two scenarii where I would like to know how an e-mail address
delivers. One of those scenarii is:
I extract e-mail address from various databases for the various
services of our system (ranging from the USENET news server to
fax to e-mail gateway) then create a (Mailman) mailing-list w
the
mail to Amavis.
There must be an error (had it working some weeks ago) but I can't
find any in the logfiles. Maybe you can help me out.
Thanks,
Marc
postconf -n:
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
bounce_queue_lifetime = 3d
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
config_directory
18:01, Marc B ha scritto:
Hi,
I've got a small issue with our Postfix Relay which doesn't use the
Policyd-Weight daemon or Tumgreyspf which it should. The Policy-Weight
daemon is running and listen if I test it and the config has no errors
but still Postfix just ignores the policy s
I'm such a giddy goat. Thanks Wietse for your hint.
The check_recipient_access acts as whitelist for policyd.
Mabye, when setting smtpd_restriction_classes I can restrict the
allowed Domains and use policy_service the same time.
Quoting wie...@porcupine.org:
Marc B:
I've g
,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_policy_domains.cf
[...]
So far it seems working, according to the logfiles.
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 1/29/2014 7:12 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 29/01/2014 14:05, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Alessio Cecchi:
Il 28/01/2014 18:01, Marc B ha scritto
Probably you can use this "smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =
check_policy_service" to tune your send limits.
Marc
Quoting Alessio Cecchi
Il 29/01/2014 14:05, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Alessio Cecchi:
Il 28/01/2014 18:01, Marc B ha scritto:
Hi,
I've got a small issue w
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart-host). Of course, just before
deli
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Yes, you should be able to do this with a transport_maps entry
> and a regexp (or pcre) smtp_generic_maps.
Thank you; however:
> # main.cf
> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> smtp_generic_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/generic.regexp
I have t
Replying to myself:
no, it really works now. Maybe I looked at the wrong log entry.
Thank you for your suggestions -- they work!
l
addresses to flat file?
If there is a way, configure these map in addition too your new user map
and tell your gateway to route mail for this map to the groupwise
server. This should be the much better way.
Marc
ail send to one host and/or balance/failover to another if
the primary host is unavailable?
I appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Marc
Hello everyone,
will ".domain.com" match "b...@sub2.sub1.domain.com" or only
"b...@sub1.domain.com" in transport maps?
"parent_domain_matches_subdomains" is not set and I don't want it to
match all subdomains on all levels.
Best
Marc
Hello everyone,
will ".domain.com" match "b...@sub2.sub1.domain.com" or only
"b...@sub1.domain.com" in transport maps?
"parent_domain_matches_subdomains" is not set and I don't want it to
match all subdomains on all levels.
Best
Marc
Am 23.03.21 um 15:10 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Marc Risse:
Hello everyone,
will ".domain.com" match "b...@sub2.sub1.domain.com" or only
"b...@sub1.domain.com" in transport maps?
With an indexed table (for example, hash: or btree:), .domain.com
will not match any em
s that may have enabled SSLv2, please update
your configuration as suggested below:
what is the oldest version of posfix (and openssl) needed to fix the
problem by this configurations changes?
Marc
t fixes without changing
the version number, so look for updates that address the DROWN-related
CVEs: CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703, CVE-2015-3197.
Thank you!
Marc
d Mailman).
Thanks in advance,
Mauro
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org
My sincere apologies to all. I was not aware of the supression. I'll
dig it out an reply from this address as I have stopped using the gmail
account.
Many apologies again.
--
Marc
On 01/03/2011 14:01, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/1/2011 7:55 AM, m...@veary.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have a pr
I have nothing in gmail.
Could someone let me know what further info is required?
Kind regards,
--
Marc
On 01/03/2011 14:01, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/1/2011 7:55 AM, m...@veary.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with my installation of postfix and virtual
aliases (mysql).
Right. We&#x
On 01/03/2011 15:34, Victor Duchovni wrote:
postconf -n
===
receive_override_options = no_address_mappings
There's your problem.
Ah! That's sorted it! This had been driving me around the bend...
Really appreciate the help.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
On 01/03/2011 15:42, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:44:25PM +, m...@veary.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:26:09 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/1/2011 8:15 AM, Marc L. Veary wrote:
I have nothing in gmail.
Could someone let me know what further info is required?
It'
hostname and
ip number than the dedicated incoming one.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Marc van Duivenvoorde
Kingsquare information services.
Ok, It might need to deliver to the local machine, but the MX will be
one of the other three ip's, this specific ip will solely be used as
relay host for our web platform. I'll give this a try tomorrow.
Thanks.
Marc van Duivenvoorde
Kingsquare information services.
On Mon, Sep 24, 20
A related question, is it possible to enforce an authenticated user to
one specific ip? I'll have to figure out how to enforce outgoing mail
to a certain ip, on a plesk machine, otherwise I'll have to get
another VPS specificly for the purpose of outgoing mail.
Met vriendelijke groet,
up?
Kind regards Marc
-08 Grooz, Marc (regio iT) wrote:
> I setup a smtpd_proxy_filter to amavis and want use TLS. Amavis and
> Postfix provide STARTTLS for smtp & smtpd. The connection from
> Postfixs smtpd_proxy_filter to amavis won't use STARTTLS. Is there a
> way to tell Postfix to use STARTTLS
I use the Option speed_adjust so Postfix open a new session to amavis in a
proxy setup. I think Postfix should use starttls even if the client don't use
starttls.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
Im Auftrag von Vikt
ing optional module Error.pm:
Can't locate Error.pm: lib/Error.pm: Permission denied at
/usr/local/sbin/amavisd line 210.
Ab und zu klappt der start dann doch ohne Änderungen. Ich habe auch schon ein
frisches Debian 8 System installiert und die gleichen Fehler. Amavis habe ich
direkt von der Webseite und spamassassin über cpan installiert. Es sind auch
andere Forenbeiträge im Internet mit der gleichen Meldung aber leider ohne
Lösung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Marc Grooz
Wir haben gerade rausgefunden das wenn wir den Amavis aus dem Homedir unter
/var/amavis starten geht es immer ?!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Marc Grooz
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
Im Auftrag von Grooz, Marc (regio iT)
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22
re:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/updated-requirements-for-smtp-relay-through-exchange-online/ba-p/3851357
Let's say I send an email. I use:
> mail from:
and in the data (body)
> From: Professional Legit Person
Looking at headers from Microsoft, they track
On 15/09/2023 12:08 am, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Marc Lucke via Postfix-users:
re:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/updated-requirements-for-smtp-relay-through-exchange-online/ba-p/3851357
That text is about relaying email: you originate a message, and
On 15/09/2023 1:38 am, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Marc Lucke via Postfix-users:
On 15/09/2023 12:08 am, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Marc Lucke via Postfix-users:
re:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/updated-requirements-for-smtp-relay-through
Hi,
I am running a mail application with Postfix 3.8.1.
For the domain 'shieldersme.com' outbound TLS is configured via this
entry in the TLS policy map:
shieldersme.com verify match=hostname:nexthop:dot-nexthop ciphers=high
protocols=>=TLSv1.2
When trying to send mail I am getting the f
On 11/20/23 19:57, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
This mail comes from external sender!
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:01:05PM +0100, Marc Dierksen via Postfix-users wrote:
For the domain 'shieldersme.com' outbound TLS is configured via this entry
in the TLS
+1 thank you. I have enjoyed Postfix for all these years & paid zero
for it. Seems wrong somehow, but I am very grateful.
- Marc
On 15/12/2023 12:20 am, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer
Salutations,
I am running Postfix 3.5.23 on Debian 11 as an edge mailserver that
accepts mails on port 25 for a list of domains defined as relay_domains
in the main.cf.
I am currently trying to setup a second smtpd process on port 587 that
accepts mails only for local recipients.
I have ad
On 1/16/24 19:46, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
The classification of input addresses into address classes as part of
transport resolution happens in trivial-rewrite(8). This is why
changing relay_domains in smtpd(8) is ineffective.
Ahhh. That explains everything.
It works correct
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 11:25:41AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> Perhaps you could use "-C config_dir" option to specify config path of
> another postfix instance, but I'm not sure it's a good idea.
On this topic, I was trying to make so sendmail uses a differen
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 11:40:39AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER via Postfix-users wrote:
> - except for a single case where I want to bypass milters
>
> Any idea except running a completely different Postfix daemons set
> on different spool directories?
Replying to myself: would [1] and spec
70 matches
Mail list logo
