d the third will be
forwarded to in...@example.com and so on.
Is it possible? do i need to install any addons for this? appreciate very
much for the help.
wesley
(those
staffs are in an email list). I did not use MySQL in my Postfix platform so
i guess Wietse's idea bit difficult for me to implement. Will check on the
APolicy daemon. thanks.
wesley
2010/12/10 Victoriano Giralt
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
right. something like that. i wonder if there's any solution for this.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Arnim Sommer wrote:
> Wesley schrieb am 11.12.2010 16:06:
>
> guys,
>
> thanks for the reply. well, the problem is that i got an generic account
> (e.g. supp...@exampl
t; On 12/12/10 1:18 AM, Wesley wrote:
>
>> right. something like that. i wonder if there's any solution for this.
>>
>> There are any number of ticketing systems freely available.
>
> We use RT, you can use whatever you like.
>
> --
> J.
>
>
--
&qu
I would not implement this.
Use something like denyhosts to ban repeat offenders ip addresses,
there are other programs like denyhosts but I can't remember the names
as it is morning and I am going to work now.
But then again it is your server. :)
--
Wesley
27;ve blocked it?
And is this the reason that your clients server gets blocked? seems
unlikely.
--
Wesley
carconni wrote:
Actually Wesley, it does. You see, if you continue to send
undeliverable mail to an ISP like Yahoo, you can get flagged. See
here:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/postmaster-01.html &
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/postmaster-31.html.
Hi
How to guess the message body’s language encoding if message didn’t have MIME
charset set? The message may be encoded with utf8, gb2312, gbk or something
others, but it didn’t have an charset header.
Thanks
m...@junc.eu, please see the screenshot above, you have also sent message
repeatly.
maybe the bug of postfix-users mailing list?
regards
m...@junc.eu wrote:
On 2020-06-08 07:52, cl...@mobile.oche.de wrote:
you repeatly send the same mail :/
This message contains attachment 2 of 2.
See message 83 for further information.
JCMCPJGGFKPIGHOM.PNG
Description: Binary data
m...@junc.eu, please see the screenshot above, you have also sent message
repeatly.
maybe the bug of postfix-users mailing list?
regards
m...@junc.eu wrote:
> On 2020-06-08 07:52, cl...@mobile.oche.de wrote:
>
> you repeatly send the same mail :/
>
ATT1.HTML
Description: Binary data
try pobox.com, whose smtp relay is reliable and cheap (20 USD/y).
regards.
Forums wrote:
So, my idea is to use automatically (managed by Postfix) an alternative
SMTP server (Gmail SMTP with my Google account) when an email is
rejected. But I don't know if it's possible and how to configure tha
problem.
Is there something that I am missing?
--
Regards,
Wesley
Bruwer
Network
&
Systems Administrator
Tel:
+27
(0)
861COMTEL (0861266835)
Fax:
+27
(0) 866565728
Physical
Address:
Suite
M1,
Island Club, Century City, Cape Town, South
Africa
Postal
Address:
PO
I need some help getting a transport map setup for the purpose of an auto
responder. I'm certain that the problem is caused by something I've done
wrong, but I just don't see what the problem is.
I have set things up according to the O'Rielly Postfix book. I have done the
following:
1: add t
I need some help getting a transport map setup for the purpose of an auto
responder. I'm certain that the problem is caused by something I've done
wrong, but I just don't see what the problem is.
I have set things up according to the O'Rielly Postfix book. I have done the
following:
1: add t
: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:34 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Transport Not Working
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:12:59AM +, Wesley Witt wrote:
> 4: add the entry to the virtual alias file
What entry? Why?
> What I'm seeing is an entry in syslog saying "User u
Hello
I saw a trend that, every ESP has taken hard work on antispam policy.
For example, from my test cases:
1. gmail totally can't be registered from PC, only mobile client (gmail,
outlook etc) can sign up a new username. they require mobile
verification in the process.
2. yahoo totally can
Greetings,
When mail is relayed through mailing list, why the DMARC policy is
possible to reject?
For example, I sent mail from x...@mail.ru to y...@googlegroups.com
Since mail.ru has the strictest DMARC policy, the recepients may choose
to reject this mail which is relayed by googlegroups,
Richard Damon wrote:
The typical options for the mailing list are
1) Just not allow people from such domains to post to the list (the
reject option you mention)
2) Rewrite the from address from people from such a domain to be from
the domain of the list (often the list address). This is arguabl
Richard Damon wrote:
That is a question to ask them. Basically the strict DMARC policy is
designed for transactional email, where spoofing is a real danger. The
side effect of it is that addresses on such a domain really shouldn't be
used on mailing lists, or any other 3rd party senders not speci
Richard Damon wrote:
The
side effect of it is that addresses on such a domain really shouldn't be
used on mailing lists,
Thanks for pointing out this. I never knew it.
Now I changed my mail to fastmail account, which I owned it for many
years. I just don't like its mobile app, it's just a
Hi
the mail I sent from mail.ru to this list got dropped, I didn’t get the message
I sent.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Nick wrote:
> On 2019-11-22 04:21 GMT, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > The email I am using is with domain of mail.ru, which has the
> > strictest DMARC
I meant I didn’t get it in my mail.ru inbox. The other providers may or may not
reject it. Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, at 5:52 PM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> Hi
>
> the mail I sent from mail.ru to this list got dropped, I didn’t get the
> message I sent.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov
Would this list break SPF then? Thanks
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/21/19 11:47 PM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > Richard Damon wrote:
> >> That is a question to ask them. Basically the strict DMARC policy is
> >> designed for transactional
SA (Spamassassin) is good idea, I saw most people running their own mail
servers are using it.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 4:35 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * merr...@fn.de:
>
> > We did get a lot of spam messages from Chinese providers. We speak not
> > Chinese, do you think if it is possible to r
Hi
when validating DMARC, it use the envelop address, or use from address from the
header? Thanks
Thanks for helps.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/22/19 6:25 AM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > Would this list break SPF then? Thanks
> >
> This list sends with an envelope sender in the lists domain, so it
> doesn't break general SPF, it will b
Google groups replace the from: with their group address. What I know the big
providers having strict DMARC setting are:
mail.ru
laposte.net
I am glad the more large providers like gmail, outlook don’t have this stupid
setting.
Regards
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Roland Köbler wrote:
>
Hello
if you have used a mail.ru email for google groups, when you posted message to
group, it will replace From header with the list address.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 6:43 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 17:19:53 Wesley Peng pisze:
> > Google groups replace the f
I totally agreed with you @Rafa.
btw, is there any good reputation, strict standard email hosting for
suggestions? I currently use fastmail, it is good for personal usage, but I
heard some privacy problems for commercial use.
thanks.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dn
I’m not sure , you may refer this discussion,
https://serverfault.com/questions/779730/why-dont-my-domains-messages-to-a-google-group-get-their-headers-rewritten-so
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 7:23 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 19:10:51 Wesley Peng pisze:
> >
> &
Or maybe block them by ESP? I saw there is a Perl module listing those big
providers in China.
https://metacpan.org/pod/Data::ChineseESP
regards
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 7:33 PM, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> I've blocked the entire ASIA netblocks in my ASN.
> We don't exchange any information with
Why it doesn’t break From: header SPF? Just curious
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > Or in short: DMARC intentionally breaks every mailinglist and every
> > mail-forwarding. So, if a mail-provider uses a strict DMARC-policy,
> > it effectively says: "Our mail-addresses
That's great explation. Thanks Richard.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/24/19 6:21 PM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > Why it doesn’t break From: header SPF? Just curious
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> >>
Hi community,
I finally got a domain from registrar, if I want to run a privacy
oriented mail server, what steps should I take?
For example, setup SSL over all, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, DNSSec, DoH,
encrypted storage, app special pasword, secondary authentication?
Is there any guide for it?
Thank
Hi
on 2019/11/26 10:22, lists wrote:
At a minimum, I would set it up to use port 587. Then block via firewall all
the email ports other than port 25 all countries from which you will not be
using the server.
Keep the attack surface small. For example don't provide for web based email.
Sorr
That look interesting. Do you provide a hosting plan Andre?
regards
on 2019/11/26 14:31, André Rodier wrote:
Hello, Bill.
I had the same concern a few years ago.
I have been self-hosting for more than a decade, and more recently, I
built this:
https://github.com/progmaticltd/homebox
This is
on 2019/11/26 17:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I would set up port 465 also. Note that TLS on 465 is implicit, while on
587 is
explicit, so it's easier to allow unencrypted connections by a mistake on
587.
587 is also used for StartTLS, am I right?
regards.
Hi
on 2019/11/26 19:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
...and there's no "starttls" on 465, that's what I meant "implicit".
while port 465 was assigned for SMTPS in January 2018, it's been used this
way on many sites/services for years (even decades)
How the traffic between big one's MTAs get
Hi
on 2019/11/26 20:53, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Sending mail out of a MTA is always on port 25. STARTTLS is used if
possible.
If using plain port 25, the messages are not secure enough for traffic.
From what I know there is a technology calling Traffic hijacking.
Regards.
on 2019/11/27 10:00, 황병희 wrote:
Personally i read public mailing lists' messages by Gmane. There is
example screenshot [0]. So i have no problem about that.
For customized spam policy, I found Tuffmail has a flexible interface.
Regards.
Hello
on 2019/11/27 12:20, Richard Damon wrote:
DMARC/SPF, which only validates to the From: header will break.
If the sender domain set up SPF to:
v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/0 ~all
Will this pass through any SPF check?
regards.
Hello
I saw myrambler.ru has a special setting for SPF:
myrambler.ru. 3599IN TXT "v=spf1
ip4:81.19.78.96/27 ip4:81.19.78.0/27 ip4:81.19.88.0/24
-exists:%{ir}.spf.rambler.ru ~all"
what does it mean for this part:
-exists:%{ir}.spf.rambler.ru
Thank you.
Thanks.
While I am still not clear about what the description in mxtoolbox.
Can you give more details?
regards.
on 2019/11/27 16:08, patpro wrote:
On 2019-11-27 08:15, Wesley Peng wrote:
Hello
I saw myrambler.ru has a special setting for SPF:
myrambler.ru. 3599 IN TXT
Hi Wietse
on 2019/11/27 23:38, Wietse Venema wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.4.8.html]
Fixed in Postfix 3.4:
It's really nice to see postfix gets continuous development for these
many years. Wish it becomes m
Hi
I have a question needing your help.
I have a few domains, every domain has a contact email.
How to configure postfix to accept every domain and every email on domain, and
deliver them to a specific mailbox?
I meant, I don’t want to add the virtual domain one by one in postfix, but like
t
Hello
My ISP email even doesn’t require SMTP AUTH. Will they be acting as open
relay? How to stop abuse of outgoing mail?
Regards
How to compile postfix into the Embedded operating system (such as the
home router) and make it as a mail gateway for Smart home appliances?
Thank you.
this mail sending feature?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:06 PM Mauricio Tavares
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:40 PM Wesley Peng wrote:
> >
> > How to compile postfix into the Embedded operating system (such as the
> home router) and make it as a mail gateway for Sma
Nice work on the release. Thanks Wietse.
Mar 17, 2020, 21:39 by emaw...@gmail.com:
> Hello! excellent work, the option to bounce emails manually is very useful
> for me.
>
> Never perform the update through the source code. I would like to know if I
> can get the src.rpm for Centos?
>
>
>
> El
Hello
Following this guide:
https://useplaintext.email/
Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
Thanks
Hello
On desktop I always use Thunderbird for MUA.
Thunderbird is clean and lite, handling protocol well.
But for mobile (I primarily use iOS), I couldn't find a good MUA to use.
I tried almost every release on appStore (outlook, edison, bluemail,
spark, mymail...), they are either too compli
mail.ru account which have greylist policy thus open
mailing lists refuse to talk to it.
regards.
wesley
Maybe UDP is filtered in chroot environment. Can you try to capture the
network flow?
Jean-Philippe Méthot 于2019年8月31日 周六上午2:08写道：
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been trying to setup postfix 3.4.6 (ghettoforge.org package) with
> dovecot, mailscanner and the mailwatch frontend on a centos 7 (cloudlinux
> 7.6) s
Hello,
As a mailing list server, how does postfix deal with google's mailbox
formats?
for exmaple, all mailboxes below are indeed the same one:
usern...@gmail.com
user.n...@gmail.com
usernam...@gmail.com
usern...@googlemail.com
Can list server know them and treat them as just one?
Thanks.
Hello
on 2019/9/4 19:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
To signal domain equivalence, the receiver should use CNAME records
or some other explicit mechanism.
from what I know, MX host should not be CNAME records in DNS zone.
regards.
viktor,
on 2019/9/4 20:09, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Perhaps, but Postfix is not a list manager. Postfix
just delivers email to the addresses in the message
envelope. If some list servers restrict posts to
subscribers, any logic to treat addresses as equivalent
would be in the list server, not P
Hello,
Is there the username specification for email system?
It seems most special characters like ".", "-", "+", "_", "#", "$" are
permitted in the username part.
And even ___username...@domain.com is right (like my sender account).
So I was confused.
Thanks.
Hello,
I found if peer MTA's timestamp is too much different from my end, the
messages may not be displayed.
for example, when you try to sign up to apache projects' mailing list,
like one of this page:
https://flink.apache.org/community.html
The response message's (for user to confirm) ti
Hi
on 2019/9/12 22:01, Helmut Schneider wrote:
relay=none, delay=0.09, delays=0.06/0.02/0.01/0, dsn=5.4.4,
status=bounced (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=EXCHANGE01 type=: Host not found)
This is a network issue rather than postfix problem I may think.
You shoul
Hi
on 2019/9/16 20:47, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
How can I refuse mail from hosts who don't have an open port 25?
What do you think from such a check?
You shouldn't.
Many email systems have delivery agent and MTA to be separated.
That's to say, they get incoming mails from MTA which has port
Hello,
though this is a little OT, but I was curious since verizon has bought
yahoo for long days, why ATT still host its customer email accounts on
yahoo platform? we know ATT and verizon are commercial competitors.
Thanks for any comments.
on 2019/9/26 16:34, Enrico Morelli wrote:
I tried to put .monster or *.monster in sender_access but doesn't work.
Is there a way to block *.monster mails?
Can you setup spamassassin for domain blacklist?
regards.
on 2019/9/26 16:42, Enrico Morelli wrote:
Can you setup spamassassin for domain blacklist?
regards.
How can do that?
The SpamAssassin whitelist and blacklist options can include globs, not
regular expressions. The valid metacharacters are ? and * to match 0-1
or 0-many characters respect
As the subject stated, how can I get the statistics on the numbers of
inbout/outbound messages every day from Postfix?
Thanks & regards.
Hi
on 2019/10/17 16:48, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I believe email should be plaintext. I don't like HTML emails either. If
somebody feels that his message needs fancy formatting, he should send
it as pdf attachment. But emails should stay plaintext.
non-latin message body should be encoded for
Hello
I saw my ESP has two MX records pointing to just the same host.
rambler.ru. 21 IN MX 5 inmx.rambler.ru.
rambler.ru. 21 IN MX 10 inmx.rambler.ru.
Does this have any value inprovement?
Thanks
Hi
on 2019/10/23 16:27, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
One sending application is sending mail with a From: header containing a
semicolon-separated list of addresses. This is not according to the
standard (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.3) and is
rejected by SES:
I was just curious, w
on 2019/10/23 16:40, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
I was just curious, why the From addr is a list of addresses?
Isn't from just a single address?
My bad - I meant to say the "To:" header!
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
regards.
on 2019/10/23 16:48, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
That sounds like what I am looking for, thanks!
How do I do that? I did not get it to work with a REPLACE in the
header_checks...
I saw postfix has a address rewrite guide you may want to ch
- - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
Thank you for looking into it.
Let me know if more info is required.
Also let me know if someone has an idea of where the problem could possibly
be?
Kind regards
Wesley S.
em must be located somewhere around there...?
Any other insights would be helpful!
Thank you
Wesley S.
--
*Synio*
*Ilgatlaan 9*
*3500 Hasselt*
*0477 71 79 25*
(lowercased).
Any idea how this could be possible and how it could be fixed?
Thanks for the feedback so far. It looks like we're on the right track to
finding the problem.
Kind regards
Wesley
Op do 27 dec. 2018 om 21:28 schreef Wietse Venema :
> Wesley van Synio:
> > I still can
ict->fold_buf)*)*;
}
Thanks for solving the issue with me!
Kind regards
Wesley
--
*Synio*
*Ilgatlaan 9*
*3500 Hasselt*
*0477 71 79 25*
found: SRS1=Ftpn=otherdomain.com===YY=
domain.com=i...@synio.be
SRS1=Ftpn=otherdomain.com===YY=domain.com=i...@synio.be
But... I do want full UTF8 support..
*So what is going wrong with the combination of UTF8 + dict_tcp_lookup?*
Any ideas how to fix this in my configuration? Or is this a bug?
Kind
backup = dict->utf8_backup;
value = backup->lookup(dict, fold_res);
*dict->flags |= saved_flags;*
Perhaps something is going wrong there?
I need to brush up on bitwise operations before I can say for sure..
but it does look like it might be the possible culprit?
Kind regards
Wesley
Op d
=yy=domain.com=i...@otherdomain.com
Dec 27 22:53:09 synio postfix/cleanup[31933]: dict_tcp_lookup: key *srs0*
==yy=domain.com=i...@otherdomain.com
So perhaps the UTF8 module changed the case to lowercase before handing it
off to dict_tcp_lookup or something..?
I really don't know...
K
n for some kind of Debian mailing list instead..
Thank you for figuring out my problem.
Kind regards
Wesley S.
Op vr 28 dec. 2018 om 00:29 schreef Wietse Venema :
> Fixed in Postfix 3.4, but for some reason never made it into
> the Postfix stable releases. Fixed by adding one se
Hello,
How can I setup username based transport?
for incoming messages, such as use...@foo.com will be delivered to host a.
use...@foo.com will be delivered to host b.
Thanks.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe se
Hello community,
Rather than compiling from the source, do you know if there is another better way to install postfix 3.9 on ubuntu 20.04 system?
I google it and found nothing useful thought.
Thanks.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-us
Is there a docker for postifx 3.9? I just want to try some new features of version 3.9.
Thank you.
- 원본 메일 -
보낸사람: Cody Millard via Postfix-users
받는사람: postfix-users@postfix.org
날짜: 24.07.24 06:38 GMT +0900
제목: [pfx] Re: install postfix 3.9 on ubuntu 20.04
Ill be honest.
Because I am using the VM, and my VM provider doesn't have ubuntu 24.04 available.
maybe I should try to get a ubuntu 24.04 from another provider and install the postfix 3.9 package then.
Thanks for all help.
- 원본 메일 -
보낸사람: Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
받는사람:
what's the main difference between a policy server and a milter?
I searched and found this link:
https://serverfault.com/questions/1149051/what-difference-does-it-make-to-implement-a-feature-as-policy-service-vs-as-milt
but I am still not pretty sure.
Thanks.
- 원본 메일 -
보낸
Great examples. Thanks for pointing out that.
- 원본 메일 -
보낸사람: Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
받는사람: Postfix users
날짜: 24.07.25 08:57 GMT +0900
제목: [pfx] Re: RFC logs_check
postfix--- via Postfix-users:
> > what's the main difference between a policy server and a milter?
Hello
I have a question about forwarding email to Gmail. Gmail requires the
sender to provide identity authentication, including SPF or DKIM. Some
of our old customers do not have dkim configured in their email system,
but they do have spf. There is no problem sending messages directly to
Gma
Today i added a DKIM to my email account (as this one). Then sending to
gmail failed, the returned message includes:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[142.250.102.26] said:
550-5.7.1 [195.170.xx.xx 12] Gmail has detected that this
message is
550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To redu
Hello
I saw 96-92-246-116-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net has no A record pointing to
your IP.
Though this IP does have a PTR record as above.
Maybe you have 'reject_unknown_client_hostname' setup in your main.cf?
Thanks.
>
> Hello All,
>
> I'm getting rejections showing:
> reject: RCPT fr
We have no way to help you on this. The reason is only known by MS itself.
If I was you, I will check the following stuff on my end,
1. sender IP reputation (listed in any RBL?)
2. sender IP reverse DNS and hostname
3. sender IP action (any bulk sending?)
4. helo hostname
5. message body (any sen
That’s great. I will look into SNI for postfix.
Thanks
On 2024-08-17 10:51, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Wesley via Postfix-users said:
i know there is is a kind of wild certificate for *.example.com.
besides that, is it possible to setup multiple separated hosts/certs
in
postfix
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 11:05:43AM +0800, Wesley via Postfix-users
wrote:
That’s great. I will look into SNI for postfix.
Sure, but do first consider a single certificate with multiple SANs, if
at all possible. Particulary for simple use cases, like the one you're
looki
On 2024-08-18 00:50, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 02:11:37PM +0800, Wesley via Postfix-users
wrote:
Yes. The current hosting I am using is with a simple case:
mail.riseup.net
smtp.riseup.net
Both works via SSL.
If the hosts are:
mail.foo.com
smtp.bar.com
That is a more
Hello
I want to deny all messages for a local user.
if I setup policy like this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/recipient-access
in recipient-access:
u...@domain.com reject
Will this work? if not, what's the right syntax?
Thank you.
--
https://wespeng.pages.dev/
__
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
- Just inbound mail from external sources? Or also other mail (locally
submitted or generated)?
yes I just reject message to that user from external source via smtp,
does that setting work?
- What is the address class of "domain.com"?
sorry what
And please see the following defaults,
root@mail:~# postconf -d smtp_use_tls
smtp_use_tls = no
root@mail:~# postconf -d smtp_tls_security_level
smtp_tls_security_level =
under these defaults, I am afraid if I don't setup them, postfix will
always talk to peer with plaintext, even peer supports
Most hosting providers block outbound traffic to port 25 by default. A
simple telnet to outside port 25 can verify it quickly.
Regards
On 2024-09-30 23:20, Jarosław Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
W dniu pon, 30.09.2024 o godzinie 09∶52 -0400, użytkownik Steve Matzura
via Postfix-users napisa
95 matches
Mail list logo
