Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>* Nick Rosier :
>
>> is it possible to configure Postfix to send an interim non-delivery
>> report?
>
>delay_warning_time = 4h
Is there a way to warn postmaster/admin of such?
at the moment, i go 'mailq' and check \queuegraph few times daily to watch for
potential prob
Mous,
Sorry, I've misunderstood the explanation, i was thinking at the server end,
where I'm confident it's correct, I'll recheck iPhone when I get access to it
again, thanks.
mouss wrote:
>Le 25/10/2012 22:39, li...@sbt.net.au a écrit :
>[snip]
>> the error message didn't say, I've scree
It seems one of my users has been hacked, my postfix server is spewing spam
from many.na...@adomain.tld, how best to prevent any outbound mails from
adomain.tld till I can look at this?
--
Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
nanotek wrote:
>I am receiving a "Certificate Error" when sending mail from K-9 on my
>android. I do not receive any error on my PC client (Thunderbird).
>
>I only have a self-signed public certificate and private key configured
>
>for use by Postfix. Should I create my own Certificate Authorit
I have Postfix/Dovecot/postfixadmin/MySQL with several virtual mailbox
domains
one of the domains is like aname.com.au, the user also now has aname.com,
and, would like to 'mirror' most of the addresses to be u...@aname.com,
THOUGH, some are to remain as us...@aname.com.au
so, both u...@aname.com
I have several domains on virtual mailbox Postfix server,
also use several RBL lists as so; that all works well
but now, of the domains, mydomain.tld needs to recive emails from a server
currently blacklisted on spamhaus
till the blacklist issue is resolved, how can allow such blacklisted
domain
On Tue, September 29, 2015 10:46 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> I don't think this meets the OP's needs. He seems to want only some
> of the addresses in the target domain aliased. For that, those and only
> those addresses should be listed in the virtual alias table (whether file
> based or SQL):
it looks like I have a couple of compromised user accounts on one of the
domains on this server, I've changed the user password then even deleted
the user (through postfixadmin) but that didn't help..? I can see in the
log this:
Oct 8 00:27:57 emu postfix/smtpd[7655]: 87E6B5E791:
client=unknown[1
On Thu, October 8, 2015 12:42 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:34:25AM +1100, Voytek wrote:
>
>
>> it looks like I have a couple of compromised user accounts on one of
>> the domains on this server, I've changed the user password then even
&g
entry?
> Did you try cas@ as entry?
how to do that ?
> El 2015-10-07 14:47, Voytek escribió:
>
>> On Thu, October 8, 2015 12:42 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:34:25AM +1100, Voytek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&
I think I've stopped compromised user sending by stopping and restarting
Postfix, prior to that, I've reloaded Postfix after adding/postmaping
sasl_access list - that didn't help, only stopping Postfix stopped it
I'm worried that 'there is more' ?
I've found one more compromised user by searchin
On Thu, October 8, 2015 2:35 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:15:36AM +1100, Voytek wrote:
>
>
>> I think I've stopped compromised user sending by stopping and
>> restarting Postfix, prior to that, I've reloaded Postfix after
>> addi
On Thu, October 8, 2015 2:35 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> There's nothing more.
Viktor,
thanks again for your help and explanation, just found this, I think I can
call it a day now:
Oct 8 02:08:41 emu postfix/smtpd[29357]: connect from
unknown[104.200.78.121]
Oct 8 02:08:44 emu postfix/smtpd[2
On Thu, October 8, 2015 3:06 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> No. Confirmation would be looking at the logs of the ongoing mails
> *before* the restart and seeing whether all the mail came in over
> a single connection (same pid, no per-connection "connect from" or
> "disconnect from" log entries f
I have Postfix/MySQL/Postfixadmin/Dovecot, using postfixadmin I've aliased
one domain to another
using a mailbox for myself for testing, sent emails to aliased domain,
both from outside (gmail) and through this server, receiving OK to my own
mailbox.
BUT, when tried sending to a different user, g
On Mon, October 12, 2015 7:07 am, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 5:51 AM, Voytek wrote:
> I’m guessing not.
> Please do not try to obfuscate your domains by using other people’s
> domains.
>
> Example.com, example.net, and example.org exist precisely for this
> pu
is there a way to block or rate limit compromised sasl senders ?
postconf -d | grep mail_version
mail_version = 2.11.0
grep limit main.cf
recipient_delimiter = +
message_size_limit = 20971520
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 50
grep sasl_username=sal
I've struck a false positive problem rejecting email,
should reject on file extension '.com', but, rejected on a domain name as
below(1):
I think this is the rule ?:
# grep "may not end with" *head*
mime_headers.pcre:/^\s*Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*"?(.*\.(ade|adp|bas|bat|chm|cmd|com
I was updating file type definitions in my header checks when I noticed I
have header checks as well as mime header checks :
/etc/postfix/main.cf
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
mime_header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/mime_headers.pcre
header_checks has (now updated) "/^
On Thu, April 28, 2016 11:05 pm, Voytek wrote:
> I was updating file type definitions in my header checks when I noticed I
> have header checks as well as mime header checks :
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
>
>
> header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre mime_h
I have a small server with several domains, always worry some dumb users'
account will get hacked and start spamming (including this dumb user,
like, my own forgotten test account got hacked)
is it a good idea to put some limits or throttling 'just in case' ?
Postfix 2.11, average server usag
I have a small Postfix/Dovecot virtual server, low usage
every so often a user account get compromised and spam sent (like couple
of days ago), now I'm seeing 5 or 6 emails 'stuck' in the queue with like:
(host mail2.abcdef.com[217.xx.xx.xx] refused to talk to me:
554-mail1.abcdef.com 554 Your acc
On Mon, June 6, 2016 8:27 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse, thanks
> Stuck in the queue with a 5xx (hard reject) reply?
yes:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
78DFF4BEAC 335977 Mon Jun 6 14:59:30 serv...@aa.com
(host mail2.b.com[217.xx.xx.xx] refused
On Mon, June 6, 2016 10:10 pm, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
Sebastian, thanks
> Second, the problem is that you will only get your backup server
> blacklisted/poorreputated aswell. I would suggest solving the underlying
> problem instead, so accounts is harder to compromise, by implementing a
> few
was listed
LISTED SORBS SPAM
119.59.120.56 was listed
LISTED Spamhaus ZEN
119.59.120.56 was listed
LISTED UCEPROTECTL2
119.59.120.56 was listed
On 20 June 2016 6:21:20 AM GMT+02:00, "S R." wrote:
Dear Voytek
Can you please check the supplier chaiseeree cannot send e-mail to
I monitor Postfix queue with Cacti, normally see warning on deffered
queue, charts in red, sends treshold warning, when there is some issues
today, first time ever saw that, I see incoming queue in Cacti growing, up
to 14/16, (charts blue) never observed that before...?
mailq gives nothing, pfque
just noticed some email sent from gmail/google bouncing from my server as
sorbs RBL had that server/host listed;
Nov 17 12:56:47 emu postfix/smtpd[16381]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-ua0-f170.google.com[209.85.217.170]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [209.85.217.170] blocked using
ot:
I have Postfix running mail server for several small domains, all working
well.
since about 48 hours, several of my domains started getting bounced from
hotmail as per below
checked with mxtoolbox, mail server is:
Checking emu.sbt.net.au which resolves to 103.15.178.123 against 100 known
bl
I have Postfix/Dovecot with virtual domains, same setup unaltered since
quite a while ago
last month, added a new virtual domain, 'just like before'.
but, today noticed this in the queue/log 'overdrawn his diskspace quota'[1]:
user's Maildir cur has like 48,762,696 bytes (lot less than other u
arted hosting in 1994).
>
>Your work has been, and is, a key part of my humble Internet career.
Many thanks to Wietse and other contributors, this ML, and, to Rodney, who told
me Postfix was the way to go when I was switching from OS/2 to Linux all these
years ago.
Voytek
--
Sent from my A
I'm unable to send an email to "a.n...@surfacetreatment.be", getting
"domain not found".
it seems to me they're misconfigured and, don't have MX set correctly?
or am i misinterpreting this, mxtoolbox find MX ?
fwiw, web surfacetreatment.be redirects to surfacetreatment.nl
thanks for help, expla
On Wed, March 1, 2017 11:13 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> That resolver is having problems that I don't see:
>
>
> $ dig +nocd -t mx surfacetreatment.be
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23879
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 2
> ;surfacetreat
On Wed, March 1, 2017 10:45 pm, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:55PM +1100, Voytek wrote:
Andrew,
> Why are you setting +nocd?
ahmm, I saw it in Viktor's post, and, copied it..oops
> It looks like you're still seeing a SERVFAIL for the MX record, at
struck a problem sending to a particular server, get 554
everything else works fine, server unaltered since setup a while back
how can I troubleshoot this ?
Mar 3 06:36:56 emu postfix/smtp[25322]: 02D124C5D9:
to=,
relay=rosstul1.rosscosmetics.com.au[115.70.161.114]:25, delay=17227,
delays=17227/
On Sat, March 18, 2017 4:06 am, Sean Son wrote:
> Hello all
>
>
> We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we can receive
> alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain threshold. What OID and
> MIB would we have to use to be able to monitor Postfix mail queues?
Sean,
I us
dumb question:
if I get 'connection closed' as below, does that confirm problem is at
remote end, not my Postfix ?
is there any other diags I can run from my end ?
Postfix works well, but, can not send to one particular server
from my Postfix server, I get telnet failure as so:
# telnet 115.70
On Mon, March 27, 2017 2:59 am, Richard wrote:
>
> Wasn't this same question (about the same IPnumber) responded to
> earlier this month by Wietse?
>
> Date: Thursday, March 02, 2017 19:34:27 -0500
> From: Wietse Venema
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: ot: 554 No SMTP service here
oops, sorr
I have a user's inbound mail blocked by barracudacentral, is there a way
to exempt this particular user/domain from this particular RBL check ?
or what else can or should I do ?
this is the only known issue with barracuda I have and, otherwise it seems
quite effective, I think ?
smtpd_recipient
On Mon, August 7, 2017 3:46 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 01:17:54PM +1000, Voytek wrote:
> Share the looging of this rejection and be more specific. The
> problem is with one specific client, or more?
ooops, sorry, I thought I did include, here it is(1):
also, this i
On Mon, August 7, 2017 8:19 pm, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> no thats completely impossible without logs
thanks, sorry, thought I did, just sent now
I'm on Postfx 2.1, (nxt project is set a new up to date server with more
current Postfix (question on upgrading etc coming soon))
> things to consider,
I currently have Postfix 2.11 /MySQL on Centos 6, looking at migrating to
current Postfix.
current server:
CentOS release 6.x
mail_version = 2.11.0
new server:
CentOS 7.3
mail_version = 2.10.1
reading some of the ML posts: is ghettoforge the way to do it ?
http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfi
On Thu, August 10, 2017 6:33 pm, Peter wrote:
> On 10/08/17 16:51, Voytek wrote:
>> mail_version = 2.11.0
>
> This is not the stock postfix for CentOS 6, so if you want to upgrade it
> on the same server you might want to check where the current postfix came
> from. How i
t
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031
thanks for any help and pointers
(I've copied this server's 2.1 settings to new server's 3.x install and,
slowly aim to bring it on line, undoubtedly more stupid question to
follow)
Voytek
mynetworks, it can make your site an open
> relay if you aren't very careful.
Wietse, thanks
the deamon does have a log full of 'DUNNO's - I guess with DUNNOs it's not
making any decision but passing it on. I'll try to read docs to understand
it better, thanks again
Voytek
d as 'stand alone' with my current postfix, ,
or just as part of iredmail ?
Voytek
I currently have Postfix 2.1 with vdomains/vusers, mysql with policyd 1.x for
graylisting and throttle, all works well.
Looking at migrating/ moving to an up to date Postfix Dovecot MariaDB server,
tried installing Cluebringer 2.0/2.1, getting multiple SQL errors at setup,
and, it seems it's no
this might be off topic, I'm not sure if I have an issue with Postfix
setup - or just end user email client setup:
I have old postfix 2.1 server, migrating to new 3.x, copied over 2.1
/etc/postfix, all seemed OK till now trying to setup an Outlook 2010
client
as I don't have Outlook 2010 to hand,
On Fri, December 29, 2017 8:18 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> ssl usually means port 465 with implicit SSL, while 587 requires explicit
> ssl (aka starttls).
with Outlook 2010, it has: none/tls/ssl/auto
so, I've tried tls as well as ssl, just in case
> However, with default postfix/master
>> so, it connects on port 25...?
>
> apparently - did you look to master.cf if there's "-o syslog_name" option
> in the submission service?
Matus,
thanks for your help
no, no syslog:
# grep syslog master.cf
#
BUT, I got the user to EDIT her existing account and, alter server host
names from o
I have 3.2.4 with /etc/postfix from 2.1, virtual domain/virtual users in
mysql
have not as yet set "postconf compatibility_level=2", "Postfix is running
with backwards-compatible default settings"
grep backward /var/log/maillog* (apart from warning about it) gives:
/var/log/maillog:
Dec 25 04:
On Sat, December 30, 2017 3:51 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You should be able to build the new Postfix, use the old config
> files, do 'postfix upgrade-configuration", and look for warnings while
> Postfix handles email for several days, about things that
> might break when you were to set compatib
On Sun, December 31, 2017 1:55 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> hmm, I am not sure I have done 'postfix upgrade-configuration"
>>
>> can I run it possibly second time ?
>
> You can run it many times (the operation is idempotent).
>
>
>> does it only if need changes main.cf ?
>
> It adds or updates some
ion)
THEN noticed I missed 'd', I've entered 'postfix reloa' rather than 'reload'
so, it's all good, thanks again!
Happy Mew Year!
Voytek
On Mon, January 1, 2018 1:19 am, Alex JOST wrote:
> Am 29.12.2017 um 21:15 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>> A bit offtopic, but I need cli-tool to remove attachments from specific
>> maildir messages, so how to do that?
>
> The Thunderbird add-on 'AttachmentExtractor' should be able to do that,
> but I
I have old server Postfix 2.x with MySQL, migrating to Postfix 3.x on a
new Centos 7 MariaDB 10.2, virtual user/domain, maybe 20 domain/100 users,
see abbreviated usage summary [1]
new server has been up and running few weeks with just a handful users,
just now, transferred another domain/25 users
On Thu, January 4, 2018 12:00 pm, Voytek wrote:
> on startup it says: Jan 04 07:48:24 mysqld-scl-helper[6908]: 2018-01-04
> 7:48:24
> 139791312545920 [Warning] Changed limits: max_open_files: 1024
> max_connections: 151 table_cache: 431
> Jan 04 07:48:24 systemd[1]: Started MariaD
On Thu, January 4, 2018 3:17 pm, Bill Shirley wrote:
> Also, if you running with systemd as init, you need to override
> the limits in the service file: [0:root@elmo SPECS 130]$ cat
> /etc/systemd/system/mariadb.service
> .include /usr/lib/systemd/system/mariadb.service
>
>
> [Service]
> #LimitNOF
On Thu, January 4, 2018 4:17 pm, Voytek wrote:
> On Thu, January 4, 2018 3:17 pm, Bill Shirley wrote:
Bill,
big big thanks!!!
I think it worked, i think the [Service] line ? made it work!!
still checking, I'll post later
V
On Thu, January 4, 2018 2:57 pm, John Stoffel wrote:
> So what is the advantage of using mysql here? Ease of adding/removing
> users?
John, thanks
yes, ease of use, and, ability of having others able to add/edit if or as
needed
> In any case, just bumping up the mysql defaults to higher numbe
On Thu, January 4, 2018 11:58 pm, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/04/18 00:52, Voytek wrote:
> I have to say, that location is pretty whacked. I wonder who came up
> with that? Who built the MariaDB packages?
Phil,
and: systemctl status rh-mariadb102-mariadb
that's what ha
I'm in the process of migrating old server postfix 2.x to new server 3.x
new server uses almost identical postfix/dovecot/mysql virtual
domains/users configuration, so currently, both servers are set up for
aaa.tld, bbb.tld, ccc.tld
I've edited MX for aaa, aaa's email start arriving at new server
I'm in the process of enabling postscreen, and, just noticed started
getting these warnings today, after editing/adding postscreen
Jan 11 13:03:12 geko postfix/smtpd[5403]: warning: restriction
`check_sasl_access' ignored: no SASL support
Jan 11 13:03:54 geko postfix/smtpd[5403]: warning: restrict
On Thu, January 11, 2018 1:17 pm, Voytek wrote:
> I'm in the process of enabling postscreen, and, just noticed started
> getting these warnings today, after editing/adding postscreen
>
oops. forgot to add:
as a part of postscreen setup, I've altered
(was)
smtpd_sasl_auth_en
in the process of attempting to setup amavisd-new with postfix, I had a
line like so in amavisd.conf
# forward to a smtpd service providing DKIM signing service
forward_method => 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10027',
BUT, don't have such service...
so, I now have a bunch of emails failing with Temporary
one of the users reported getting on TBird client:
"Alert an error occurred when sending mail: the mail server sent incorrect
greeting 4.7.0 error too many connections from 110.170.19.146"
# grep '110.170.19.146' /var/log/maillog | wc
1349 24838 304573
I've tried
# grep 'too many' /var/log
On Wed, January 24, 2018 8:47 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> Find the error in the postfix log for the user's IP address. The
> postfix error may not be the same as what the user is presented with.
Noel,
thanks
I can only see this, am I using correct search criteria though ??
# grep '110.170.19.146
On Wed, January 24, 2018 9:34 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> You should grep for "reject:", not error:
Noel, thanks again,
(log since Jan 21)
# grep '110.170.19.146' /var/log/maillog | grep "lost connection"
Jan 22 14:37:02 geko postfix/smtpd[4701]: lost connection after DATA
(257981 bytes) from 110-
On Wed, January 24, 2018 9:34 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> and a few seconds later STARTTLS succeeds, and that IP successfully sends
> mail from user hr@ to 10 recipients.
>
> Are there many users on that same IP via a NAT?
Noel,
just noticed I do NOT have that IP entered in 'mynetworks =', it used t
On Thu, January 25, 2018 2:58 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> Instead of adding them to mynetworks, add that IP (and any other
> remote offices) to smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions.
On Wed, January 24, 2018 10:59 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> submission service usually does not use mynetworks.
On Wed, January 24, 2018 3:55 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> There is no simple regexp, but there is the fqrdns.pcre project. The
> project is a large hand-maintained list of dynamic hostnames with a goal of
> zero false positives. It's not perfect, but it's useful and safe for
> general use.
>
> https:
On Sun, January 28, 2018 7:00 am, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre
>> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist
>> check_reverse_client_hostname_access pcre:/etc/postfix/fqrdns.pcre
> So generally, you can put it anywhere after
> reject_una
I've tightened or rather overtightened several postfix limits, in what
seemed like a good idea at the time...
noticed now this warning, this user is on a dynamic IP, so can't add his
IP to exception:
going by the counter "Connection rate limit exceeded: 125", what values
should I alter?
Jan 31 1
eived, they are using
amazonses.com. I'm concerned maybe I've misconfigured either postscreen or
something else ?
using this limited information, what's best way to search for refused
mails ? connections ? what else ? from amazonses.com ?
thnks, Voytek
---
Return-Path:
one of the users is waiting for an email from server currently listed on
http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?value=203.12.160.162
chances are it might get fixed in 12 hours, or, maybe not
short of removing dnsbl.manitu.net from my RBL checks, is there a way to
'bypass' this current predicament
On Tue, February 13, 2018 9:18 pm, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> On 13 February 2018 at 08:42, Voytek wrote:
>
> For use within restriction list(s):
> check_client_access is for checking the purported address, or the ip, of
> the incoming connecting client check_sender_access is f
I've recently updated Postfix from 2.1, and, enabled postscreen, all's
working well, though, just picked up a false positive:
several users inbound mail blocked with dnsbl.spfbl.net
I have like:
# grep spfbl.net main.cf
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org*5, psbl.surriel.com*2,
bl.spamcop.
7;health' outsources their email to verizon - whilst I'll try to
contact them, I don't like my chances at getting too far - but never know.
I've struck probs with health/verizon a while back, I think, last time i
came across it, by the time I;ve looked, they were already delisted
thanks again,
Voytek
a user started getting many spam/malware with like 'nested' from:
<"mick@cinkmedia.comgeranc"@gmail.com>
<"m...@cinkmedia.com.abc"@expertsmeetings.org>
I'm waiting for a full header from him, can anything be done in Postfix ?
or where ? to reject/block ?
V
On Sat, November 17, 2018 12:01 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
thanks !
>> or where ? to reject/block ?
>
> /etc/postfix/sender_pcre:
> /@.*@/ reject
>
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
> pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_pcre
I currently have as so, add as 1st
On Sat, November 17, 2018 1:30 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> ...
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated
>> ...
>>
>
> If first, then it will affect local, authorized, and remote clients.
>
>
> If last, then it will affect remote clients.
Wietse,
thanks again.
I have a user reporting from time to time getting:
"An error occurred while sending mail. Mail server sent incorrect greeting
4.7.0 geko.sbt.net.au error too many connections from 147.50.1.226"
is this a Thunderbird issue ?
when I search like below, I get nothing, what am I doing wrong?
and, how
On Tue, December 4, 2018 1:05 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Is that the verbatim message, or just similar? Postfix responds with
Viktor,
thanks , vebatim is:
"An error occurred while sending mail: The mail server sent an incorrect
greeting: 4.7.0 geko.sbt.net.au Error: too many connections fro
On Tue, December 4, 2018 1:05 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Dec 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM, Voytek wrote:
also:
# pflogsumm/var/log/maillog | grep 147.50.1.226
2 Connection rate limit exceeded: 15 from unknown[147.50.1.226]
f...
2 Connection rate limit exceeded: 1
On Tue, December 4, 2018 3:07 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:58:59PM +1100, Voytek wrote:
>
>
>> Dec 4 12:07:08 geko postfix/smtpd[6908]: warning: Connection rate
>> limit exceeded: 13 from unknown[147.50.1.226] for service submission
>> Dec 4
I have an existing Postfix/Dovecot/Mysql on Centos 7, I'm attempting to
clone/duplicate existing 3.2.4 to new 3.3.2
after installing from GF RPM 3.3.2, I've copied/overwrote /etc/postfix old
> new , with some minor edits (add new IP, add self cert)
I've temporarily commented out two smtpd recip
ender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_checks,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_checks,
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/client_checks.pcre,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
--
Voytek
ader
Content-Type:
video/x-ms-wmv;??name="CrissAngelpullsaLadyinHalfbothhalvesAlivefromwww.metacafe.com.wmv"
from nschwmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com[61.9.189.152]; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=:
5.7.1 hc2 ".com" file attachment types not allowed
--
Voytek
00CCC69
Protocol: SMTP
Port: 587
Secure(SSL): Yes
--
Voytek
lding mail servers on multiple
> VPS's using CentOS and I use your RPM's all the time. I'd be very
> interested in 2.6 RPM's.
+1 for interest
I use/have used your RPMs, and, built RPMs with my desired options
following your instructions, many thanks again
--
Voytek
on_cache_timeout = 36000s
--
Voytek
mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts
virtual_mailbox_domains =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf
virtual_mailbox_limit = 1024
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_minimum_uid = 5000
virtual_transport = virtual
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
--
Voytek
s = static:5000
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts
virtual_mailbox_domains =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf
virtual_mailbox_limit = 1024
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_minimum_uid = 5000
virtual_transport = virtual
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
--
Voytek
On Fri, March 5, 2010 11:29 am, mouss wrote:
> Voytek Eymont a écrit :
>
> there is no evidence in your config that auth'ed mail gets a different
> ticket than other mail.
>
> the recommended way is to enable "submission" (port 587) and configure
> clients to
or pfqueue, it might be what you want
--
Voytek
or a particular user.
is there an 'easy' way to modify spamrep to do just that ?
or is there another way to create such one-off request ?
--
Voytek
to= proto=ESMTP
helo=
--
Voytek
s.org,
reject_rbl_client combined.njabl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org,
reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net,
reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com,
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031,
permit
--
Voytek
t onet.pl, tell them to stop "fixing"
> headers. They add a TAB after "From:" and "Date:", which is stupid and
> looks like rateware behaviour).
nope, don't know anyone there
--
Voytek
n master.cf
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_levels=encrypt -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
thanks
--
Voytek
rs are in MySQL as:
# grep virtual_mailbox_maps main.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
# cat mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
user = xxx
password = yyy
hosts = 127.0.0.1
dbname = ppp
table = mailbox
select_field = maildir
where_field = username
dumb Q:
so, if I
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
