On Thu, October 8, 2015 12:54 am, nico...@devels.es wrote:

Nicolás, thanks

> Is 104.200.78.121 listed in your $permit_mynetworks parameter, or a CIDR
> that contains it?

no
# grep 104.200  main.cf
#

> Did you postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_access?

yes

> Did you try c...@dom.org.au as entry?
> Did you try cas@ as entry?

how to do that ?

> El 2015-10-07 14:47, Voytek escribió:
>
>> On Thu, October 8, 2015 12:42 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:34:25AM +1100, Voytek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> it looks like I have a couple of compromised user accounts on one
>>>> of the domains on this server, I've changed the user password then
>>>> even deleted the user (through postfixadmin) but that didn't help..?
>>>> I can
>>>> see in the log this:
>>>>
>>>> Oct  8 00:27:57 emu postfix/smtpd[7655]: 87E6B5E791:
>>>> client=unknown[104.200.78.121], sasl_method=LOGIN,
>>>> sasl_username=c...@dom.org.au Oct  8 00:27:58 emu
>>>> postfix/smtpd[7678]:
>>>> 645845FCCE:
>>>> client=unknown[104.200.78.121], sasl_method=LOGIN,
>>>> sasl_username=b...@dom.org.au
>>>>
>>>> I've also tried adding to main.cf this "check_sasl_access
>>>> hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_access"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> # cat /etc/postfix/sasl_access
>>>> cas HOLD bank HOLD cas...@dom.org.au HOLD bankst...@dom.org.au HOLD
>>>
>>> Notice that the logs say "c...@dom.org.com", but you're not blocking
>>> that exact authentication name.
>>>
>> Viktor,
>>
>>
>> sorry, attempted to anonymize email addresses, BUT, overlooked the last
>>  two, only annoymized domains in the last two
>>
>> in the /etc/postfix/sasl_access names are correct,
>>
>> I've used both with and without domain
>>
>>
>> V
>>
>


Reply via email to