The nice thing about this new list server is that it plays very
well with gray listing (without causing the immediate "retry
storms" that sometimes can be seen, especially with German service
providers which do nothing but themselve perform address
verification, and are unfortunately used very ofte
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230307214046.ajvsx%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|The nice thing about this new list server is that it plays very
The ugly that it uses this terrible "Who via LIST "
stuff even if the sender does not (granted: yet) uses DKIM.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The m
Michael wrote in
<0d3709b8-72ae-4e54-a8a5-5a82f3b09...@hemathor.de>:
|On Thursday, 9 March 2023 15:29:01 CET, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
|wrote:
|> Let me help remind you that your email address has been out there
|> for a while. Here are some samples from the postfix-users list:
|
|i
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4pxdmb1f8fzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|postfix--- via Postfix-users:
|> Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing \
|> list emails?
|> The problem I see is many people will hit reply in their email client \
|> which will cr
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230309195933.ga16...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 9.03.2023 o godz. 13:34:39 postfix--- via Postfix-users pisze:
|> Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing \
|> list emails?
|> The problem I see is many people will hit reply in their email client
Gerald Galster wrote in
<4339792b-b58d-4c42-a836-1e71e0eb6...@gcore.biz>:
|> This list uses Mailman configuration settings, not handcrafted code.
|> If people believe that it is worthwhile to change the Mailman
|> implementation or the DMARC spec, then I suggest that they work
|> with the peop
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230309210623.0mekl%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
|This is the crux with email as it is, if they would have invented
|something MIME-alike at the very beginning, and messages would
|really be enveloped entirely, and enveloped entirely, etc., as in
|old times, where each
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230309222044.ga19...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 9.03.2023 o godz. 21:39:10 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|>|With changing From: to point to the list itself and adding Reply-To:
|>|pointing to the author this behaviour hasn't changed. I'm s
Matthias Fechner wrote in
:
|Am 10.03.2023 um 13:01 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
|> In the old days I used the tags to filter my messages and place them \
|> in the
|> right mailbox. With the advent of DMARC I stopped that and turned \
|> to using
|> List-Id:-headers as fil
Gerald Galster wrote in
:
In my postgray thing i have "allow .dhl.de" (surely for a reason).
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
__
Hello.
I see a thread for "double-bounce check applied to itself" from
February 2021, but it does not exactly fit this bill (i think):
Mar 11 01:10:36 postfix/smtpd[2936]: connect from
AWS-OUTLOOK.TOP[85.31.45.162]
Mar 11 01:10:37 postfix/smtpd[2936]: Anonymous TLS connection established
fr
Hello.
Imagine the DKIM standard would be revised and extended a bit (to
get rid of DMARC and ARC, even, could it be) to
- sign the entire message as for now,
- but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all receivers
are actually covered by the DKIM signature, so
- for any "RCPT TO:<>"
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230311005401.bynjz%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
|>From [.]
And i know it is not popular among UNIX people, who like it
that way, but this "From_" quoting was introduced by mailman
(i presume) when it mangled my quoted-printable to something
non-reversible.
I do not kno
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4pyjz55tpdzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|>> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
|>> <20230311005401.bynjz%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|>> ...
|>>|>From [.]
|>
|>
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
:
|On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\
|sers wrote:
|
|> - sign the entire message as for now,
|
|You're confusing the message and the envelope.
..no? No.
|> - but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all rec
Scott Kitterman wrote in
<4d53bd64-1672-49c5-adca-487f320f8...@kitterman.com>:
..
|>But i treat your answer as if milters will not do that.
|
|If you want to talk about DKIM replay, the IETF DKIM working group \
|was just rechartered to work on that exact thing: ietf-d...@ietf.org .
Maybe a
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230311003215.yvtaf%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|I see a thread for "double-bounce check applied to itself" from
|February 2021,[.]
...
|Is there an easy (non-DNS etc) way to say that @sdaoden.eu (or
|even @(.+\.)?sdaoden\.eu MUST NOT come from the outside, so
Forget abo
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230312003030.4aldj%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
| <20230311003215.yvtaf%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
||I see a thread for "double-bounce check applied to itself" from
||February 2021,[.]
| ...
||Is there an easy (non-DNS etc) way to say that @sdaoden.e
Postfix users wrote in
<4pzsd16nkpzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
...
|Postfix must wait for fsync() to complete (or whatever its Cloud
|equivalent is), before it can take responsibility for delivery of
(postfix does not support FULLFSYNC on MacOS.)
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230318191215.gb30...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 18.03.2023 o godz. 14:54:15 Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users pisze:
|> I setup my postfix for the clients to use only protocols > TLSv1 with
|>
|> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1
|> smtpd_tls_protocols
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230318203334.ga31...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 18.03.2023 o godz. 21:08:17 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|> I still have no problems with
|>
|> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = >=TLSv1.2
|> smtpd_tls_protocols = $smtpd_tls_mandatory_pr
GP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD;
url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt
Peter wrote in
<29591811-f04e-b667-d5df-3e3223e7d...@pajamian.dhs.org>:
|On 19/03/23 09:08, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
|> I still have no problems with
|>
|>smtpd_tls_mandatory_
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230318234124.ga32...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 18.03.2023 o godz. 23:54:28 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|> Eh, no. I do not do either. (Granted i use PayPal one, two times
|> a month, but my bank account is not online-enabled.)
|> I _never_
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230322104345.ga10...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 20.03.2023 o godz. 21:46:59 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|> Luckily here a couple of shops remain, even for clothes and
|> electronics (mostly household). It is much uglier a bit further
|[...]
|
|
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<2023030559.mn7ux%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
| <20230322104345.ga10...@rafa.eu.org>:
||Dnia 20.03.2023 o godz. 21:46:59 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
||> Luckily here a couple of shops remain, even for clothes and
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230322230223.ga17...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 22.03.2023 o godz. 23:05:59 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|> I have very strict firewall rules, and you have become blocked for
|> last access + 84000 seconds.
|> Should work again.
|
|I again got
Bernardo Reino wrote in
<79552717-5p3o-8q26-r963-124or6r66...@oozx.bet>:
|On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
...
|> (That is pretty off-topic for postfix; except maybe for fun
|> posting my SMTP related firewall
...
|> add_ru
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230324175540.o_vn-%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Bernardo Reino wrote in
| <79552717-5p3o-8q26-r963-124or6r66...@oozx.bet>:
||On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
| ...
||> (That is pretty off-topic for postfix; except maybe for f
gt;:
||>|On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
||> ...
||>|> (That is pretty off-topic for postfix; except maybe for fun
||>|> posting my SMTP related firewall
||> ...
||>|> add_rule -p tcp --src ${addr}${mask} \
||&g
Ahem, .. i however have to add one more sentence..
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230324193739.s-qco%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
||reading, programming, and nature impressions, four to five hours
||a day, all in all, for caring for the (other) animal friends
||alone, sorry.
Please .. that "other
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4pshgn4l8vzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
|> I have some, starting after I updated from 3.8-202304331 to 3.8-2023040\
|> 2.
There are snapshots, there is source access beyond regular
releases?
...
|> There are two changes, one in util/
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4psxbn1frczj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|> <4pshgn4l8vzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
|>|> I have some, starting after I updated from 3.8-202304
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
:
|On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:20:17PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\
|sers wrote:
|
|> It seems so square to have a need to use the C library resolver,
|> or external library, or even code something yourself, in order to
|> implement a policy or mil
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote in
:
|On 12.04.23 12:41, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote:
...
|>Does it mean that I should either:
|>
|> 1) create SPF record for mail.mydomain.com
...
|I would do the first:
|
|fantomas.fantomas.sk descriptive text "v=spf1 a -all"
Interesting thi
Hello.
Unlike promised there had to be another release, and i still hope
it is ok to forward the announcement here.
(Bicycle-Day has passed in the meantime, however.)
This fixes some bugs, even non-developers can now see --verbose
logging, for example. Out of interest i implemented sandboxing,
s
Hello.
On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[8485]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray:
process id 8486: command time limit exceeded
Apr 19 14:43:56 postfix/spawn[19651]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray:
process id 19755: command time limit exceeded
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
|>
|> Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[8485]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray: \
|> process id 8486: command t
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4q2khr57flzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|> <4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|>|> On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
|>|>
|&g
natan wrote in
:
|Hi
|I use keepalived and easy check like:
|
|vrrp_script chk_myscript {
| script "/usr/bin/postfix-check.sh"
| interval 4
| fall 2
| weight 10
| user root
|}
|
|...
|#!/bin/bash
|echo "ehlo localhost" | /bin/nc -w 1 "127.0.0.1"
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4q2l0p03svzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|> <4q2khr57flzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|>|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|>|> <4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcup
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
:
|On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 06:13:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users \
|wrote:
|> We're thinking of adding a few new settings to the stable Postfix
|> releases that allow Postfix to regain some control over crypto
|> policies that do not necessarily
Robert Schetterer wrote in
:
|Am 22.06.2023 um 13:58 schrieb André Rodier via Postfix-users:
...
|> Shortly after it has been setup, I see brute force attacks (not
|> surprising) from a whole /24 network (more surprising).
...
|> Is there any way, with postfix, to run a script on authentica
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote in
:
|On 26.06.23 10:32, Tan Mientras via Postfix-users wrote:
|>On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:28 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users \
|>postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
|>
|>> If there's not much of them, you can copy them to maildir using \
|>> e.g. mutt
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4r0ss907yqzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Ken Gillett via Postfix-users:
|> I disagree about Apple. In this respect they most definitely ARE
|> idiots. Email addresses do NOT require anything after the @. That
|> simply means the user of that name on the current host. If t
Michel Verdier via Postfix-users wrote in
<87fs4s49y5@free.fr>:
|On 2023-08-09, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote:
|
|> do you think this would be OK, or does the hostname and IP (be it
|> localhost.local) have to be there ?
|
|Why don't you remove completely this header in your
Michel Verdier via Postfix-users wrote in
<87jzu4c5qi@free.fr>:
|On 2023-08-09, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
|
|> 192.0.2.1:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
|> -o syslog_name=vpnsub
|> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=no
Hello.
The Lua scripting language, which recently celebrated its 30th
anniversary, is usable standalone or as an embedded interpreter,
and used by many programs and operating-systems, even in-kernel,
or as a bootloader, searches a new mailing-list hoster.
I was just thinking, maybe some reader of
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-08-19 02:30:
...
|> (And sorry for being off-topic.)
|
|postfix have not lua support yet, maybe it will come ?
Outsourcing parsing (and dumping) of configuration files to Lua
could significan
Peter via Postfix-users wrote in
<5080e33a-0d10-d028-d59e-0481024e3...@pajamian.dhs.org>:
|On 22/08/23 15:42, Bruce Dubbs via Postfix-users wrote:
|> I have built postfix-3.8.1 from source and want to use it only on the
|> local system. That is, I really only want it to receive messages from
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4rvkgl4lfyzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> "But" postfix's sendmail reads the postfix configuration, it will
|> not work otherwise, at least once i tried last.
|> Going over SMTP (s
Peter via Postfix-users wrote in
<8b2661ea-5560-af5a-e674-d2fb10094...@pajamian.dhs.org>:
|On 23/08/23 11:58, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
|> "The problem" (i have given up and did not try it for long) is the
|> configuration directory. Does this work
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4rw8mh2rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|>|Alls you need is to 'mount' the maildtop directory into a container
|>|with read/write permission, and install the Postfix sendmail and
|>|postdrop
It seems to me there is not much interest of mail operators in
stepping to ed25519, reducing the payload of DNS and email?
I know dkimpy supports it (and more -- but is python, uuuh!) for
long, but OpenDKIM is unchanged for eight years. (At least my
sf.net import from 2017-09-23 still stands.)
Bt
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
:
|On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:06:46AM +0100, Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-u\
|sers wrote:
|
|> We are looking into implementing DKIM signing for one of our services,
|> and there are multiple ways to implement that.
|>
|> So far I have found that you can
Hello.
Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:12 PM Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
| wrote:
...
|> Btw i would wonder: why do -- as email operators -- still use DKIM
|> at all, since there is ARC and it also offers signatures and
|> verificat
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|>Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote in
|> :
|>|On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:12 PM Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
|>| wrote:
|> ...
|>|> Btw i would wonder: why do -- as email operators -- still use DKIM
|>|
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote in
<9d22bd4f4b3f203609d2d676306e8...@junc.eu>:
|Noel Butler via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-05 04:53:
|> On 03/11/2023 10:22, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
...
|> DKIM, was a problem, but for several years now mailman can do t
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|On 09.11.23 15:27, Shaun Erickson via Postfix-users wrote:
|> We use a fake (internal, externally-unregistered) domain, for our
|> division’s servers. Let’s call it fakedomain.com or fd.com, for short.
|
|Just FYI, there are domain names
P.S.:
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20231103002256.iibfi%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote in
| :
||>Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote in
||> :
||>|On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:12 PM Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
||>| wrote:
||
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote in
<20231115204142.ga1...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 15.11.2023 o godz. 20:02:44 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|> Funnily i just now got while sending a mail to not more than about
|> i think two dozen gmail accounts:
|>
|>
Testeur via Postfix-users wrote in
<083b817e-2bf9-4307-9484-e5acf678a...@starinux.org>:
...
|I'd want that the return-path be the same that the From sender.
|Is there a mean to do that with a postfix mean (eg. with rewriting \
|headers) ?
Should be -f (and -F) to sendmail if i understood you
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4sx8x207tzzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
|> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 07:19:31PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\
|> sers wrote:
|>
|>>Remarks: many MTA installations and sites disallow setting an
|>>
Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users wrote in
<12336799.O9o76ZdvQC@matthias-pc>:
|Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2023, 19:01:23 CET schrieb postfix--- via \
|Postfix-users:
|>> I am looking for an option to temporarily pause delivery via LMTP \
|>> and defer mail while the Dovecot mailboxes are being b
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4sr8hc44p7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Currently, Postfix does not send the Postfix-generated Received:
|header to Milters, because that is how Sendmail works, that is what
...
|This information would improve the Milter's analysis. Untrusted
...
|Th
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4srcnm0d3jzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
|> <4sr8hc44p7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Currently, Postfix does not send the Postfix-generated Received:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4srxyy1hslzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
|"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
|by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
|
|There is so
Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote in
<6039ed61-2c8f-4a12-b736-994d32632...@billmail.scconsult.com>:
|On 2023-12-17 at 09:27:36 UTC-0500 (Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:27:36 -0800
|(PST))
|saunders.nicholas--- via Postfix-users
|is rumored to have said:
|
|> How is this header populated?
|>
|> X-Go
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4svjy117ywzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
...
|I expect that a SOCKS5 client would not use much code, compared to
|the code that was needed with HaProxy.
Gaetan Bisson (former ArchLinux, a very smart math professor
Tahiti) has written a small LD_PRELOAD SO
Hallo.
Lars Kollstedt via Postfix-users wrote in
<5d6f30a5-9401-47e7-90a9-627bd6447...@man-da.de>:
|on 18.12.23 um 23:15 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote via Postfix-users:
|>|> X-Google-Original-From:nicho...@mordor.saundersconsulting.tech
|>|
|>|By Google. Exactly what their algorithm is for it is no
A. Schulze via Postfix-users wrote in
<8c5873ea-137e-4938-8b77-2194fd757...@andreasschulze.de>:
|Am 02.01.24 um 20:44 schrieb Vince Heuser via Postfix-users:
|> smtp inet n - y - - smtpd
|
|Hi,
|
|the smtp server run chroot. You need to configure syslog t
Hello.
I am currently writing my first ever milter, a yet postfix-only
DKIM sign-only one.
I want to do "that" (well: actually DKIM, not milter) for years
but could not because i had "no I-M-F aka RFC 822/2822/5322
parser of acceptable quality". That has changed (quite a bit),
but i will
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tpmnz1dqyzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Postfix has to be compatible with libmilter, the reference
|implementation from Sendmail. It absolutely makes no sends for me
|to unilaterally add features. If you wish to propose libmilter API
|changes, such as c
Michael Storz via Postfix-users wrote in
<0cf37c59789c8be39a442926261d2...@lrz.de>:
|Am 2024-01-31 15:09, schrieb David Bürgin via Postfix-users:
|> Michael Storz:
|>> FWS = ([*WSP CRLF] 1*WSP) / obs-FWS
|>>
|>> A FWS can be a single WSP or a folded line.
|>>
|>> Therefore
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
<20240131155624.ga51...@veps.esmtp.org>:
|> SMFIP_NOQUIT would
|> be a good protocol extension in general
|
|"Use the source, Luke."
|
|You mean something like
|SMFIC_QUIT_NC
|?
I did, i have that symbol (like MDS256..), yes. So maybe, yes.
This is one
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tq7t76ypkzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Claus Assmann via Postfix-users:
|>> SMFIP_NOQUIT would
|>> be a good protocol extension in general
|>
|> "Use the source, Luke."
|>
|> You mean something like
|> SMFIC_QUIT_NC
|> ?
|
|And... Postfix 'kn
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
|is not in an error state, sending
|
|SMFIC_QUIT_NC
|
|and later sending
|
|SMTIC_CONNECT
|
|are sufficient to make a Milter fully f
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20240131203248.XtHi_6Do@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
| <4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
||So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
||is not in an error state, sending
||
||SMFIC_QUIT_NC
||
||and
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqfyk4qzqzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
|> <4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter c
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqkyr4p2zzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Looks like there is sufficient basis to make SMTPD_QUIT_NC rerquests
|thts from Postfix. Just need to figure out how to enable/disable
|this particular command based on the Postfix and Milter protocol
|versions. T
Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|no crash over the past day, so something must indeed be off with the
|packages, disappointing, oh well. On the bright side, I no longer depend on
|these getting updated.
There were often problems with the -s they use. Especially before
they starte
Taco de Wolff via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|While writing a milter for use with Postfix, I was unable to change the
|first header field and instead of changing it, Postfix appends it to the
|end of the header. Incidentally, as I believed this was a bug with the
insheader with index 0 worked fo
Taco de Wolff via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|Thanks Wietse and Steffen, I forgot to mention that I'm using Postfix
|3.5.8, but it appears the bug is thus still present in the latest version.
|Looking forward to the fix :-)
|
|@Steffen, that is genius and hadn't thought of it. I can confirm tha
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote in
:
...
|I can now also say that these milters:
|
|pyspf-milter
|opendkim
|opendmarc
|
|(at least their versions in Debian 12)
|
|do NOT remove existing Authentication-Results: and thus this ste is
|necessary to avoid possible confusion o
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
:
|On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:36:09AM -0500, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
|
|> Sorry, context is important. This server needs to pass a Payment Card
|> Industry (PCI) compliance scan. Their definition of weak: "key lengths of
|> less than 112 bits, or else use th
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 12:26:33AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|
|> i still use the
|>
|> # super modern, forward secrecy TLSv1.2 / TLSv1.3 selection..
|> tls_high_cipherlist = EECDH+AESGCM:EECDH+AES256:EDH+AESGCM:CHACHA20
|
|I don't re
Hello.
Is it possible to escape braces in resource files?
I am currently testing an hm early beta of my thing and did
lb = {
rb = }
in main.cf to be able to say
dkim-sign unix - n n - - spawn
user=_postfix_xlocal argv=/tmp/s-dkim-sign
--milter-macro-sign ${lb}daemon_name${rb},sign
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tpc280nhvzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Hello.
|>
|> Is it possible to escape braces in resource files?
|> I am currently testing an hm early beta of my thing and did
|>
|> lb = {
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20240305004501.fwAHTulV@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
| <4tpc280nhvzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
||Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
||> Is it possible to escape braces in resource files?
...
||What happens w
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tpcly5z0dzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
|> <20240305004501.fwAHTulV@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|>|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
|>| <4tpc280n
Hello Wietse Venema!
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tq1wl2k2czj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
|> With this in master.cf:
|>
|> dkim-sign unix - n n - 0 spawn
|> user=_postfix_xlocal argv=/tmp/s-dkim-sign
|>
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote in
<20240306000454.itbj3nHU@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de; dkim=fail header.d=sdaoden.eu;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none
Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164])
Why does sys4 fa
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote in
<20240306000832.cK3_SjGH@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote in
| <20240306000454.itbj3nHU@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|
| Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de; dkim=fail header.d=sdaoden.eu;
| arc=none (Messag
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqwct4jgczj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
|> The text should have said:
|>
|> Other command-line arguments
|> Specify "{" and "}" around command arguments that must start
|> with "{" or that must contain whitespace
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqh100n6pzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Are you trying to say that Postfix represents a multiline message
|header as text with \n instead of \r\n?
Yes.
|That is very well possible. Postfix strips \n and \r\n line terminators
|on input, and the MIME pa
Hello Wietse Venema :)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqhxw0ksyzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
|> <4tqh100n6pzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Are you trying to say that Postfix r
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote in
<20240306193747.mAtzRjYs@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
...
|My milter now treats LF and CR not in a CRLF as real whitespace.
|The email i just sent was accepted by Google, this one should also
|wrap, and we see what this software does (rspamd is it i
Ah, please.
Let me please reply to this thread once more, to be sure. (The
other did not have folded.)
(Pressing thumbs!)
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote in
<20240306194657.5KGvOP2Q@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Ah, please.
|Let me please reply to this thread once more, to be sure. (The
|other did not have folded.)
|(Pressing thumbs!)
That failed. But i replied to that again to a Google account, and
A last check.
Thank you, postfix-users@.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
___
Postfix-users ma
Hello.
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote in
<20240306195734.nj_iAyWy@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|A last check.
|Thank you, postfix-users@.
Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de; dkim=pass header.d=sdaoden.eu;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none
So it seems to me
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
