header checks/body checks

I'm using header_checks and body_checks to block certain classes of spam that amavis/sa don't seem to be able to catch. The trouble is that when it rejects the message, the message failure text is sent followed by: [BODY] (and presumably [HEADER] if it matches a header_check rule). Is there a

Re: header checks/body checks

__ From: "li...@rhsoft.net" To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 12:16 PM Subject: Re: header checks/body checks Am 04.11.2014 um 21:12 schrieb J.: > I'm using header_checks and body_checks to block certain classes of spam > that amav

Re: header checks/body checks

Returned in a non-delivery notification. Like this: Remote host said: 550 Spam not accepted. [BODY] From: Wietse Venema To: J. Cc: "postfix-us...@cloud9.net" Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 12:19 PM Subject: Re: header checks/body checks

Re: header checks/body checks

rol. I would like to not show the sender which part of the message is triggering the rejection. ____ From: Wietse Venema To: J. Cc: Wietse Venema ; "postfix-us...@cloud9.net" Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 5:35 PM Subject: Re: header checks/body check

Correction

Apologies. I'm not sure why "[BODY]" is showing up after the rejection line from header_checks and body_checks, but I was mistaken about it disclosing exactly why the message was rejected. Regardless of whether it's a body_check or header_check that is matched, the failure message says "[BODY]"

Re: Correction

I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and this shows up in the log: Nov 4 12:09:24 kest postfix/cleanup[13287]: 375FR2F2491F: reject: header Subject: VvVvV test message...[etc] Then when I do a tes

Re: Correction

From: Wietse Venema To: Postfix users Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:26 AM Subject: Re: Correction J.: > I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a > header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and this &g

Re: Correction

, November 5, 2014 1:48 AM Subject: Re: Correction Am 05.11.2014 um 06:45 schrieb J.: > I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a > header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and > this shows up in the log: > > No

Re: Correction

header_checks: /Subject: VvVvV/ REJECT Spam not accepted here. body_checks:/VvVvV/ REJECT Spam not accepted here. From: Wietse Venema To: Postfix users Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 7:15 AM Subject: Re: Correction J.: > This is the mess

Re: Correction

Ok, thanks. From: Wietse Venema To: Postfix users Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 7:59 AM Subject: Re: Correction [actual quote from qmail non-delivery notification, address anonymized] > : > Remote host said: > 550 5.7.1 Spam not accepted here. > [BODY]

PCRE question

Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be a line break after the underscores to match, but it's matching. Does . match linebreaks?: Text: "For Testing Only: __ xxx From: My Name To: any one " PCRE rule: /*[\s\n\r]*(.*) (.*)@

Re: PCRE question

Thanks. I guess I'll have to dig into the SA rules for that then. From: Viktor Dukhovni To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:17 AM Subject: Re: PCRE question On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:08:54AM -0800, J. wrote: > P

warning: mysql query failed: MySQL server has gone away

Hello all, Hope you all are well and preparing for the great X-mas. I have found a typical problem in my mail server which is running now almost 1 year. This server is based on postfix+dovecot+Mysql the errors are as follows ~ error1 > warning: mysql query faile

Re: warning: mysql query failed: MySQL server has gone away

Dan Langille wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2008, at 12:54 AM, J. Bakshi wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> Hope you all are well and preparing for the great X-mas. >> >> I have found a typical problem in my mail server which is running now >> almost 1 year. >

Re: warning: mysql query failed: MySQL server has gone away

J. Bakshi: > error3> warning: lookup owner-postmaster, NIS domain infoservices.in, > map mail.aliases: internal yp server or client error > ~~~` >>When reporting a problem, please do NOT remove useful information >>such as the name of

Re: warning: mysql query failed: MySQL server has gone away

Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Friday, December 26, 2008 at 06:09 CET, > "J. Bakshi" wrote: > > >>>> Apparently, your Postfix tries to use NIS for alias_maps, and some >>>> SYSTEM LIBRARY function reports an error. Perhaps you need

Re: warning: mysql query failed: MySQL server has gone away

J. Bakshi wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > >> On Dec 24, 2008, at 12:54 AM, J. Bakshi wrote: >> >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Hope you all are well and preparing for the great X-mas. >>> >>> I have found a typical problem in m

Re: Properly Specifying RBL in main.cf

Rich Shepard wrote: > > Ah, so! That explains it. I run Dan Bernstein's dnscache here, but > use my > ISP's DNS servers otherwise. > > So, now I need to consider whether to remove the spamhaus line from > main.cf or set up and maintain my own dns server. > I find that having a local unix-based

Re: Properly Specifying RBL in main.cf

Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, J Sloan wrote: > >> I find that having a local unix-based dns server is often orders of >> magnitude faster than relying on an upstream isp for dns resolution. > > Joe, > > I don't know that the effort to set up and m

Re: gmail relay and certificates on Fedora 10

Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt... Joe sean darcy wrote: > I followed the instructions on > http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/ > to create your own certificate to use with google. > > main.cf: > .. > ## this to use certificate I created: >

weird postfix TLS behaviour

We're seeing an odd problem with postfix TLS only when talking to an ironport device. We configured smtp_tls_security_level = none and used smtp_tls_policy_maps to set per site tls policy, rather than doing tls by default. This had worked perfectly for over months and many thousands of smtp sessio

Re: weird postfix TLS behaviour

Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:50:49PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > > >> We have just started doing business with a firm that uses an ironport >> device, and discovered that postfix will not issue a STARTTLS to that >> host, whether it's lis

Re: weird postfix TLS behaviour (solved)

Victor Duchovni wrote: > >>> The policy table lookup key does not match the destination nexthop, or >>> > > > > That's exactly the problem. > > > I think you should be able to figure this out, even without reading the > below, but if you are in a hurry try the documentation: > > ht

Re: Performance tuning

For what it's worth, we've found ext3 to be far too slow for our needs. The best setup we've found is reiserfs, mounted with "noatime" and "notail" options - Joe Brandon Hilkert wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" > > To: > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:52 AM > Subje

Re: my mailserver has been blacklisted

Charles Marcus wrote: > On 3/26/2009, Jim Wright (j...@wrightthisway.com) wrote: > >> Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network. >> > > Please... such comments are worse than useless... > > It may not be what you want to hear, especially

Re: Newbie configuration/installation question

Tashfeen Ekram wrote: > I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my > rails application. My rails application is not able to connect to it. > Could this be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20? > also, what configuration would suit me best if I only want to send > emai

Re: Proxying a policy service

Adrian Overbury wrote: > Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a > policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever > used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail > everything with 'Server configuration problem'. This is a re

Re: Proxying a policy service

Wietse Venema wrote: > J Sloan: > >> Adrian Overbury wrote: >> >>> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a >>> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever >>> used) that, if it

Re: Proxying a policy service

Sahil Tandon wrote: > > Google 'hapolicy synopsis' -- the author of postfwd wrote a perl > script which acts as a load balancing policy service that can return > dunno if the underlying services are unreachable. Obviously, if > hapolicy itself malfunctions, you're back at square one. Looks intere

Re: Proxying a policy service

Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > What drawbacks did you experience? We run a local policyd instance on each > postfix server too, all connecting to a central (not replicated) MySQL. > Policyd's behaviour when MySQL becomes unavailable is configurable, it can > either tempfail (4xx) all incoming e-mail o

Re: Postfix-2.6.0 RPM

Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > > Sorry to hear that but in the mean time you can grab .src.rpm for a > prior release, the tarball for the current release and modify the > .spec file to reflect this. I've been doing this for our smtp servers for some time. The suse factory postfix srpm compiles nicel

Re: Proxying a policy service

Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:15:07AM -0700, J Sloan wrote: > >> Yes, that is the benefit of doing it that way. But we experienced problems >> with recurring corruption of the isam tables when the network connections >> to the db server were interr

Re: Proxying a policy service

Jan P. Kessler wrote: > > hapolicy (http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/tools/hapolicy-0.99.1) was developed > to be small (~200 lines perl), simple and reliable. therefore it uses > only basic perl modules and relies on postfix spawn. we run it since > more than 6 months without problems to have a shared gre

mail forwarding is not working at all

Dear all, I hope you all are very well. I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail forwarding feature and found that the forwardin

Re: mail forwarding is not working at all

Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Tue, June 2, 2009 11:08 am, J. Bakshi said: > > >> I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running >> almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding >> with the system but it has the option. T

Re: Should I upgrade from 2.3.X?

Michael Wang wrote: > Wietse Venema wrote: >> Michael Wang: > [...snip...] >>> Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon? >> >> Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year. > > So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I > have (very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of t

Re: No SMTP AUTH when TLS enabled

Oops! I forgot to check SSL. My client now seems to start a TLS session and still nothing. Here is the log with the SSL error. Thanks. Jan 2 13:02:11 fedora postfix/smtpd[20531]: connection established Jan 2 13:02:11 fedora postfix/smtpd[20531]: master_notify: status 0 Jan 2 13:02:11 fedora p

Re: No SMTP AUTH when TLS enabled

you provide a set of instructions to follow? Thanks so much. On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * froinds J : > > Oops! I forgot to check SSL. > > My client now seems to start a TLS session and still nothing. Here is the > > log with the SSL error

Re: No SMTP AUTH when TLS enabled

What should I use keylength and digest when creating both the CA cert and the smtpd cert? Should I leave the passwords blank? Thanks On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * froinds J : > > Ah you so were right. > > I set up postfix to use the certs t

How to block particular outgoing mails through postfix

Dear list, I am trying to drop outgoing emails having particular email-id in its [TO] field. Say myn...@domain1.com and myna...@domain2.com, hence any mail destined for myn...@domain1.com or myna...@domain2.com will be dropped . To achieve this I have made a file sender_reject with following

Re: How to block particular outgoing mails through postfix

J. Bakshi wrote: > Dear list, > > I am trying to drop outgoing emails having particular email-id in its > [TO] field. Say myn...@domain1.com and myna...@domain2.com, hence any > mail destined for myn...@domain1.com or myna...@domain2.com will be > dropped . To achieve this

Re: How to block particular outgoing mails through postfix

/dev/rob0 wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:34:13AM +0530, J. Bakshi wrote: > >> I am trying to drop outgoing emails having particular email-id in >> its [TO] field. Say myn...@domain1.com and myna...@domain2.com, >> hence any mail destined for myn...@domain1.com o

Re: OT: The Book of Postfix

A very very good news :-) Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Julien Vehent : > >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:17 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter >> wrote: >> >>> * JORGE CARMINATI : >>> Hi! I just want to know if the authors of this book are planning to release an updated rev

Re: suitable webmail

it seems that roundcube is popular. It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd probably see orders of magnitude more if it weren't for fail

Re: suitable webmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mouss さんは書きました: > > you mean things like > GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport > GET /round//bin/msgimport Not lately. Most recently, they're looking for version info: GET /rc/README GET /webmail/README GET /roundcube/README

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Thanks for all the tips. > > Postfix and Dovecot are indeed on the same box and I do agree with you that > it would require one heck of a hack to get this to work. See below, it might be a "simple" configuration stil

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 12:24:20 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > J. Roeleveld put forth on 3/4/2010 2:12 AM: > > On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > > > > With that, I thought there is an option in postfix to bcc a single > > address on all email

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 14:55:59 you wrote: > 12:24:20 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > J. Roeleveld put forth on 3/4/2010 2:12 AM: > > > On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > > > > > > With that, I thought there is an option in postfix

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 15:27:45 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 14:55:59 you wrote: > > 12:24:20 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > > J. Roeleveld put forth on 3/4/2010 2:12 AM: > > > > On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:10:21 Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-03-04 9:08 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >>> I am not familiar with Dovecot, but the above might be doable with > >>> Dovecot as well. > >> > >> Does that mean I'd need a autosendfolde

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:57:02 Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-03-04 10:26 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> Interesting... yes, this is doable with dovecot if you are using its > >> LDA, and you can do it via the global sieve script (which can be made > >> mandato

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On Thursday 04 March 2010 18:23:19 Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-03-04 11:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > True, but it is my understanding, please correct me if I am wrong, that > > with Postfix, the BCC-option forces a copy of the email (regardless of > > which user sent it)

Re: postfix gmail.smtp.com -port 587

On Thursday 04 March 2010 20:10:26 bruce wrote: > hey > > new to configuring postfix, got a few questions > If you ask them, we can try to provide some answers?

Re: postfix gmail.smtp.com -port 587

On Thursday 04 March 2010 20:44:28 bruce wrote: > hey > > new to configuring postfix, got a few questions about how to configure > postfix. > > I'm running Centos/Fedora, with Postfix, from the basic yum install. > The Sendmail process has been stopped. > > I can easily send a basic test mail f

Re: Transport table gone ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Noel Jones さんは書きました: > On 3/6/2010 8:29 AM, Xavier HUMBERT wrote: >> Hello, I make rather heavy use of transport_maps as explained in >> and in the >> transport(5) section of the man pages. >> >>

Re: PCI Compliance

On Thursday 18 March 2010 13:26:43 Barney Desmond wrote: > On 18 March 2010 21:57, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > 3. We read the report, and find things like "server exposes its > hostname in the greeting banner", or "server appears to allow the use > of the VRFY command". Does this mean that the

Re: unable to telnet localhost 25

On Tuesday 08 June 2010 13:09:02 Khawaja M. Jawad wrote: > Hi, > > I am using postfix + MailScanner + Mailwatch, Everything is working fine. > postfix is relaying emails for all of my clients/domain, but I am unable to > telnet localhost 25. Although I have allowed 127.0.0.0/8 range, listening >

Re: unable to telnet localhost 25

On Wednesday 09 June 2010 06:39:16 Khawaja M. Jawad wrote: > Thanks for the answer over a silly question J.Roeleveld. There are no silly/stupid questions, only silly/stupid answers :) > It was a firewall issue, I added rule for localhost to connect at port 25. > Issue is resolved. Even though I

Incorrect mail forwarding with virtual_alias_maps & LDAP

Hi, I have inherited a postfix MDA that I'm just trying to understand and we currently have a problem with the forwarding of emails using LDAP lookups. Currently an email is forwarded if it matches the below map: virtual_alias_maps = ldap:ldapforward ldapforward_query_filter = (&(|(mail=%s)(

Re: Speed up queue injection

On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote: > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > * Ram : > > > Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message > > > > OK! > > > > > Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s > > > > That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in > > a way that bypasses

Re: Speed up queue injection

On Friday 13 August 2010 19:58:38 Noel Jones wrote: > On 8/13/2010 8:22 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote: > >> Ralf Hildebrandt: > >>> * Ram: > >>>> Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message >

Re: Regexp for blocking dynamic hosts?

On Tuesday 31 August 2010 03:15:31 junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote: > .* This will block all hosts, not just specific ones. > > -- > From: "Patrick Lists" > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:34 PM > To: > Subject: Regexp for blocking dynamic hosts?

How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

Hi All, I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because the "From" address contains an underscore in the domain name. Example address: u...@lists_example.org What I am looking for is a way to parse email addresses and replace all underscores to dashes, eg. the followin

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:15:19 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * J. Roeleveld : > > Hi All, > > > > I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because > > the "From" address contains an underscore in the domain name. &g

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:46:34 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * J. Roeleveld : > > My guess is header: > No, envelope Ok, need to read up on the actual difference between the two. Thought "envelope" is the whole "history", eg. where the email has been. And

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:04:23 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * J. Roeleveld : > > On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:46:34 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > * J. Roeleveld : > > > > My guess is header: > > > No, envelope > > > > Ok, need

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Thursday 18 November 2010 13:55:14 Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/18/2010 3:12 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because > > the "From" address contains an underscore in the domain

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Thursday 18 November 2010 15:20:47 Wietse Venema wrote: > Jerry: > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:28 +1100 > > > > Bron Gondwana articulated: > > > Yeah, we're on it. Seriously considering not being so strict > > > about the domain name. There was stuff from Brad Fitzpatrick > > > when LiveJou

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Saturday 20 November 2010 02:40:26 mouss wrote: > Le 18/11/2010 10:15, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : > > * J. Roeleveld: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because > >> the "

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:58:34 mouss wrote: > Le 22/11/2010 08:55, J. Roeleveld a écrit : > > [snip] > > > > There is only 1 email address causing issues, eg. am only rewriting that > > specific one. > > if so, then simply use > > u...@list

Re: Do not send non-delivery notification

On Thursday 25 November 2010 17:12:22 Lukas wrote: > Hi, > > >> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want > >> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any > >> messages.. Is it possible? > > > > Yes > > And how? > > >> It should be useful fo

How to extract information from postfix log through cron ?

Hello postfix gurus, I have an email server built on postfix+dovecot+mysql (I have made it based on ISP style mailserver available at net ) for our organization and the system is running for more than 4 yrs. I like to arrange something which can analyze the mail log everyday and send me an emai

Re: How to extract information from postfix log through cron ?

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:24:10 +0530 "J. Bakshi" wrote: > Hello postfix gurus, > > I have an email server built on postfix+dovecot+mysql (I have made it based > on ISP style mailserver available at net ) for our organization and the > system is running for more than

Re: How to extract information from postfix log through cron ?

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:05:50 -0600 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > J. Bakshi put forth on 12/14/2010 3:27 AM: > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:24:10 +0530 > > "J. Bakshi" wrote: > > > >> Hello postfix gurus, > >> > >> I have an email server built o

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

On Monday 20 December 2010 13:11:16 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I'm searching for an automated solution that will split > bigs emails in several parts ( as we do with mpack manually ) > then reassemble them at reception. > > It would be transparent for the user that would > receive only one b

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

you can always increase the allowed size of these emails to match. -- Joost > > On 12/20/2010 01:17 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Monday 20 December 2010 13:11:16 Frank Bonnet wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> I'm searching for an automated solution that wi

Re: Change error messages returned by Postfix

On Monday 03 January 2011 04:12:46 Wietse Venema wrote: > Mark Scholten: > > Hello, > > > > Should I look in the source or is there a better location to change the > > texts returned by Postfix after the error code for a connecting MTA? I'd > > like to give custom messages back for (example) a fai

Re: - email Header corrupted?

On Mon, January 3, 2011 1:26 pm, Ralf W. wrote: > Hello List - I have a client who has a MS-SBS and using a pop3 connector > to pop > emails from our server. It turns out that the SBS at some messages will > not > pull the email, and is saying that the email header from this email is > corrupted.

Re: Change error messages returned by Postfix

On Monday 03 January 2011 17:35:51 Wietse Venema wrote: > J. Roeleveld: > > On Monday 03 January 2011 04:12:46 Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Mark Scholten: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Should I look in the source or is there a better location

Re: Inbound email into script

On Monday 24 January 2011 18:38:55 polofuzzu wrote: > On 24 January 2011 17:35, Noel Jones wrote: > > On 1/24/2011 11:20 AM, polofuzzu wrote: > >> Thank you Victor for taking the time to answer my questions. > >> Please see respond inline > >> > >> On 24 January 2011 16:46, Victor Duchovni > >>

[ Urgent ] Problem with realy

Dear list, Here is a very urgent problem with **relay** in my postfix. My postfix is allowed to relay a particular domain. I have put the configuration as relay_domains = < domian_name allowed to relay> ` I maintain a text f

Re: [ Urgent ] Problem with realy

K bharathan wrote: > what about 'transport' ! If you are asking about the main.cf configuration then it is a s below. ` virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp ``` > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:51 AM, J

Re: [ Urgent ] Problem with realy

ram wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 12:21 +0530, J. Bakshi wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> Here is a very urgent problem with **relay** in my postfix. >> >> My postfix is allowed to relay a particular domain.

Re: [ Urgent ] Problem with realy

ram wrote: > > >> Note When I send mail from this very server the mails are forwarded >> according to the virtual_alias_maps. >> but when I do the same from another server the second server mail.info >> shows that the message is successfully. But the first server >> where my postfix is runnin

subdomains matching in access file

Trying to close access from one domain and it subdomains via access file. ~# echo ".karpatik.cn REJECT" >> /etc/mail/access ~# echo "karpatik.cn REJECT" >> /etc/mail/access ~# postmap /etc/mail/access ~# postconf -n | grep parent parent_domain_matches_subdomains = debug_peer_list, fast_flush_

Re: subdomains matching in access file

Thx! I try it with running postfix and it works ok. But another question: why with this configuration of parent_domain_matches_ subdomains "cn" matches any chinas domains, and ".cn" - does not? postmap(1) only does "raw" lookups. It won't do subdomain matches. It > doesn't even know that it's a h

Re: Backscatter email

Matt Richards さんは書きました: > Hello, > > I just want to check up on something ... > > I run my own mail servers, using postfix and a few years ago I use to > get quite a lot of backscatter due to spam messages being sent out with > forged from addresses. > > Today I still run my own mail server but

How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Dear list, My postfix server is running on a internal test server and we use the mail server to test the different services which has mail sending capabilities. I like to tweak the postfix so that it only and only send emails to a specific domain and not anywhere else. Is it possible to implement

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, J. Bakshi wrote: > > >> My postfix server is running on a internal test server and we use the >> mail server to test the different services which has mail sending >> capabilities. I like to tweak the postfix so that it only a

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Eero Volotinen wrote: > J. Bakshi wrote: > >> Thanks to point it out :-) I am looking into it. Is there any other >> option so that I can only define the domain name with the proper keyword >> in main.cf and postfix send mails to only that domain ? > > Err.. why? I

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Eero Volotinen wrote: > J. Bakshi wrote: >> Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> J. Bakshi wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks to point it out :-) I am looking into it. Is there any other >>>> option so that I can only define the domain name with the proper >>

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Eero Volotinen wrote: > J. Bakshi wrote: >> Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> J. Bakshi wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks to point it out :-) I am looking into it. Is there any other >>>> option so that I can only define the domain name with the proper >>

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Wed, November 18, 2009 5:38 am, Eero Volotinen said: > > >> J. Bakshi wrote: >> >> >>> Could you kindly give me an example to restrict the domain with access ? >>> >> How about followi

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/18/2009 2:49 AM, J. Bakshi wrote: >> >> Thanks for your hints. I am also searching for a simple solution which >> just start working from main.cf . I like my postfix to send email to a >> very specific domain only; just say gmail.com so if y

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

J. Bakshi wrote: > Noel Jones wrote: > >> On 11/18/2009 2:49 AM, J. Bakshi wrote: >> >>> Thanks for your hints. I am also searching for a simple solution which >>> just start working from main.cf . I like my postfix to send email to a >>> ver

Re: How to restrict domain in postfix ?

Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, J. Bakshi wrote: > >> Noel Jones wrote: >> >>> You have not sufficiently defined for us what you want postfix to >>> do. The solution will probably involve more than just setting some >>> flag i

Re: 4KB of disk space burning on a single email

On Friday 20 November 2009 13:42:58 Arora, Sumit wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm just testing my postfix server for load and disk usage. > I'm using content filter on some another server, and I don't feed the email > back to postfix. > > Email data is getting deleted from my postfix server, but I don

Re: 4KB of disk space burning on a single email

ncrease. Hopefully, this will reduce the possible locations to check for possible locations. -- Joost > > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of J. Roeleveld Sent: > Friday, November 20, 2009 6:

Re: A way to trace mails flow

On Friday 20 November 2009 14:15:16 Alessandro Fachin wrote: > Hi all, > > sometimes (...) I need to trace the complete flow of mails through > postfix queues until the delivered to dovecot (including the clients > connections/disconnections and obviously the operations execute by > Mailscanner).

Re: 4KB of disk space burning on a single email

stfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of J. Roeleveld Sent: > Friday, November 20, 2009 6:51 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: 4KB of disk space burning on a single email > > On Friday 20 November 2009 14:14:03 Arora, Sumit wrote: > &g

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >