On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote: > Ralf Hildebrandt: > > * Ram <r...@netcore.co.in>: > > > Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message > > > > OK! > > > > > Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s > > > > That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in > > a way that bypasses and filters) > > > > > But I want it to be atleast 100/s > > > > Two machineS? > > relay boxes > > > > > Delivery is not at all an issue , because postfix gives it to further > > > relay boxes which are under our control again. > > > > Why not inject to the further relay boxes? > > > > > Do I need to increase the hardware > > > > It could be :) > > Other options: increase input concurrency, or play with in_flow_delay. > Note that increasing your input rates will cause output rates to drop. > It's all about competing for disk access. > > Wietse
Further options, I think: - Disable filtering (provided the only possible connections are related to these emails - put the queue on a ram-disk (8GB Ram, might leave 6GB for the queue, would this be sufficient?) These are theoretical, I have no idea if this is at all possible and if this can cause further issues elsewhere? -- Joost
