Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, J Sloan wrote:
>
>> I find that having a local unix-based dns server is often orders of
>> magnitude faster than relying on an upstream isp for dns resolution.
>
> Joe,
>
>   I don't know that the effort to set up and maintain djbdns is worth any
> speed increase. I've no basis for comparison.

Dunno about djbdbs - last I checked it was rather long in the tooth -
but using the standard bind9, out of the box, as shipped by linux
vendors and used as a caching dns server is a very cheap and easy speedup.

Joe

Reply via email to