I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a
header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and this
shows up in the log:
Nov 4 12:09:24 kest postfix/cleanup[13287]: 375FR2F2491F: reject: header
Subject: VvVvV test message...[etc]
Then when I do a test message with a body_checks rule, I get the following in
the log:
Nov 4 12:18:01 kest postfix/cleanup[8218]: 1G6112F36227: reject: body
<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff [etc...]
________________________________
From: Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org>
To: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: Correction
J.:
> Apologies. I'm not sure why "[BODY]" is showing up after the
> rejection line from header_checks and body_checks, but I was
> mistaken about it disclosing exactly why the message was rejected.
> Regardless of whether it's a body_check or header_check that is
> matched, the failure message says "[BODY]" either way.
Never assume that what you claim is actually correct.
What evidence do you actually have that what you see is
the result of matching a header_checks or body_checks rule?
For example, what is the actual evidence in the mail logfile?
Wietse
