received and
This is a huge downside especially with the size of some of these
attachments. If you can block it before it fills your pipe you soften
any effect that the greylisting delay adds.
Don't forget about postscreen as well. It's easy to apply and does a
great job.
--
D'Arcy
It looks like hotmail is on two DNSBLs and postscreen is blocking
them. I would like to offer my users a way to whitelist individual
addresses but it looks like I can only whitelist CIDR blocks. Is
that the case or do I have another option?
Cheers.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administ
On Wed, 14 May 2014 10:09:19 -0500
Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/14/2014 9:59 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > It looks like hotmail is on two DNSBLs and postscreen is blocking
> > them. I would like to offer my users a way to whitelist individual
> > addresses but it looks
s to figure out how to whitelist hotmail. The answer
is to figure out how to push back on hotmail to manage their users
better and control spam.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
both of them build from mail that hits them. It might slow down a few
emails but if all you have are two mail servers this may be acceptable.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
sgid.cache
If something similar is happening with those programs but with a common
database (e.g. /var/db/msgid.cache) that might have the effect that you
are seeing.
Just spitballing here. The procmail log might shed more light.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://ww
rks and don't bother with
authentication. I suggest authentication though so that your users can
get their email no matter where they are. People are mobile.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:23:45 -0500 (CDT)
Larry Stone wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > I don't know how to do that but I wonder why you want to. The whole
> > point of authentication is to allow your users to get email without
> > havi
> something else that really solved the problem.
The OP didn't really give enough context but he also changed
the order of the two lines.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:49:09 +0200
"li...@rhsoft.net" wrote:
> where do you see any changed order in that two lines?
My mistake. I am so used to unified diffs that I misread the OP. It
looked like this to me.
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
line 1
-line 2
line 3
+line 2
line 4
--
D'Arc
sender
passes some reasonable threshold.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
umber three which is the one I want to isolate.
Actually, number three can also look like number one when they try an
invalid address so grepping for the lost connection log line would be
fine if I could ignore number two.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
le
> artifact by sending QUIT after their payload is rejected rather than
> just dropping the connection. They already know this. Apparently
> (for now) they would rather save a few milliseconds and move on to
> the next target.
This is what I am worried about. Right now I am just co
ces. Keep an eye on the mail queue if the
time to bounce (maximal_queue_lifetime) is too long or reduce that but
not too much. I find 3d long enough these days.
Also, have you checked to see if you are on any blacklists?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:32:18 -0400
Rich wrote:
> Its says to rename or delete it and restart the postfix. It will
> rebuild.
He doesn't want to delete all the entries, only one of them.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.
block lists right away.
On the other hand, if you decide to start a proper opt-in anonymous
service contact me. That would be a great service and I have some
ideas about that.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:17:19 -0500
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:51:36AM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:19:31 +0200
> > Sebastien wrote:
> > > our emails are sent to non opt-in people, but we deliver personal
> >
n account
> is hijacked:
>
> sasl-access:
> lu...@example.com REJECT 5.7.1 Your login is compromised.
This is a particularly good solution as it allows the user to continue
receiving email so that you can send them them a message explaining
exactly what the problem is.
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:50:36 -0500 (EST)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> - Rejecting mail on the basis of a short string is likely to result
> in false matches.
For example, it would block this thread.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex
ch
suspected spam after it is accepted. Look at spam-fighting sites for
some ideas.
If you do find a way to block 100% of all spam please tell us how.
Better yet, package it and sell it. You will be a billionaire.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
ce:
>
> abj...@mydomain.com
> lwoei...@mydomain.com
How are they getting queued up? If the address doesn't exist on your
system you should not be accepting it in the first place.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
all to /dev/null) this is still a bad idea. If someone
sends you an important message at li...@lazygranch.com it will be
silently ignored. If you don't have a catch-all the message will
bounce and the sender will realize that he made a typo and resend it.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Admini
ender. Anything else is a
failure. I don't want to hear that my client missed a big sale because
of a typo on their prospective client's part.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
their system password on the web server
for all to read.
So has anyone else had to deal with this issue?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
mail on
> to the real sendmail or providing an error back to php.
I can't control if they use sendmail or SMTP directly to the mail
server. I do block port 25 to anywhere else though so at least I can
force them through my mail server.
Thanks for the suggestions.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
to be any action taken. Is there any way
in postfix to determine that the milter is actually being run? I tried
setting syslog to debug but that didn't show anything.
Is it possible that mail arriving locally is bypassing the milter?
postconf -n attached. I only removed the tls lines.
--
x.org/MILTER_README.html#plumbing
Is there something specific I should be looking at. I did check that
page before and I am sure that what I am doing follows everything
there. What did I miss? Mailman is sending by SMTP, not the sendmail
command line so the SMTP-only Milter application should work,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:17:19 -0500
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:09:34PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:38:45 -0500
> > Is there something specific I should be looking at. I did check
>
> I was thinking, as I be
Unless someone else has a Postfix answer I would look at your system
first. I may be wrong but this doesn't smell like a Postfix problem to
me. Start by diagnosing your slow logins.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
lse is as
convoluted as FTP and that FTP is being deprecated in favour of cleaner
and more secure protocols.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
30 matches
Mail list logo
