On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:31:47 -0700
li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> ‎This seems counter intuitive. So I am better off having a catch-all
> account that random emailers will fill up than not having one?

No!  Even though you don't have to have a mailbox to fill up (you can
direct catch-all to /dev/null) this is still a bad idea.  If someone
sends you an important message at li...@lazygranch.com it will be
silently ignored.  If you don't have a catch-all the message will
bounce and the sender will realize that he made a typo and resend it.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net

Reply via email to