On 2023-03-07 at 13:27:41 UTC-0500 (Tue, 07 Mar 2023 13:27:41 -0500)
postfix--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Reviewing logs I notice many soft bounces from the new list. Some
emails from the new list have been accepted and I don't understand
what the differences are. I have not s
On 2023-03-10 at 05:59:00 UTC-0500 (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:59:00 +0100)
Adrian Huryn via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Thanks for reply.
Logs from rspamd
[...]
2023-03-10 11:54:43 #31829(rspamd_proxy) <71bd42>; lua;
greylist.lua:348: greylisted until "Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:59:43 GMT",
ne
On 2023-03-12 at 00:03:32 UTC-0500 (Sun, 12 Mar 2023 00:03:32 -0500)
Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 3/11/23 19:04, pyh--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to use an object storage system (like aws's S3) to
store
message files? if this can be
On 2023-03-18 at 01:28:42 UTC-0400 (Sat, 18 Mar 2023 16:28:42 +1100)
Phil Biggs via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I have just finished building a new server for a friend and, after
installing
the postfix FreeBSD package and restoring his main.cf, I see no
postscreen logs
at all.
I h
On 2023-03-18 at 09:54:15 UTC-0400 (Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:54:15 +0100)
Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi !
I setup my postfix for the clients to use only protocols > TLSv1
with
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1
smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSL
On 2023-03-28 at 06:10:27 UTC-0400 (Tue, 28 Mar 2023 03:10:27 -0700
(PDT))
Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hey there all,
Dayjob sometimes receives mail for one domain that we'd like to have
bypass certain milters (specifically, we want to exempt them from some
On 2023-04-12 at 06:41:02 UTC-0400 (Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:41:02 +0200)
Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users <400the...@gmx.ch>
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I have domain mydomain.com, with mx record:
$ host -t mx mydomain.com
mail.mydomain.com
and I have SPF record on my domain:
host
On 2023-04-18 at 14:54:22 UTC-0400 (Wed, 19 Apr 2023 02:54:22 +0800)
tom--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
How to reject messages by languages?
For example, only English, Germany and Chinese messages will be
accepted. All others should be rejected.
For that sort of filtering, you
On 2023-04-23 at 14:29:31 UTC-0400 (Sun, 23 Apr 2023 20:29:31 +0200)
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-23 16:43:
On 23.04.23 11:19, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Subject: [pfx] postfix does not add Ret
On 2023-04-25 at 09:14:18 UTC-0400 (Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:14:18 +0200)
Jos Chrispijn via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Running mailservice with Postfix
PTR record is set to myserver.mydomain.com (1.2.3.4)
Every time I receive external e-mail, my logfile shows:
Apr 25 15:01:39 terra post
On 2023-04-25 at 12:24:04 UTC-0400 (Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:24:04 -0400)
Alex via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi, I realize this is probably one of the most frequently asked
questions,
but I really can't figure out why this was rejected.
Apr 25 12:06:01 petra postfix-226/smtpd[592344]:
On 2023-04-26 at 10:07:09 UTC-0400 (Wed, 26 Apr 2023 16:07:09 +0200)
Andreas Cieslak via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi list,
i want to achieve that my postfix relay will modify the subject based
on
the recipients.
The postfiy relay is receiving email from other internal systems a
On 2023-04-26 at 11:56:01 UTC-0400 (Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:56:01 +0200)
Mihaly Zachar via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Dear All,
I am building a new server where I would like to build the best spam
filter
possible :)
I am checking postscreen these days. I am planning to turn on the
"
On 2023-04-28 at 09:59:53 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:59:53 +0200)
Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi !
question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not sent
from a domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like
sen...@sub.domain.tld or sub.sub.dom
On 2023-04-29 at 06:43:01 UTC-0400 (Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:43:01 +)
Ken Peng via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Nope. I found that if I enabled protocol test, every provider
including gmail/orange/vodafone sending messages to me will get
response code 450. After I disabled those proto
On 2023-05-01 at 04:45:37 UTC-0400 (Mon, 1 May 2023 10:45:37 +0200)
Kolusion K via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello
Postfix's documentation for the tls_high_cipherlist parameter states
to see the output of the command 'postconf -d' to see the default
setting.
Sadly, the d
On 2023-05-02 at 11:47:03 UTC-0400 (Tue, 02 May 2023 17:47:03 +0200)
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Viktor provided a milter that test it before queue, while spamassassin
is after queue ?
SpamAssassin is NOT inherently after-queue. There are at least 4 open
source
On 2023-05-04 at 08:21:31 UTC-0400 (Thu, 04 May 2023 14:21:31 +0200)
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello list,
another more question, does postfix support domain based vhosts?
It depends on what you mean by that...
There is no mechanism in SMTP for a server to det
On 2023-05-16 at 08:16:21 UTC-0400 (Tue, 16 May 2023 20:16:21 +0800)
Tom Reed via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello list,
Should we reject failed message on DKIM validation stage, or DMARC
validation stage, or both?
Generally, neither.
IF (and ONLY IF) the "From: " header address
On 2023-05-16 at 10:11:39 UTC-0400 (Tue, 16 May 2023 22:11:39 +0800)
Tom Reed via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
For OpenDMARC this setting:
SPFSelfValidate true
Can it handle the case when incoming message has rewritten
envelope address by SRS then no SPF found for header From addres
On 2023-05-16 at 11:27:52 UTC-0400 (Tue, 16 May 2023 11:27:52 -0400)
Alex via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Is there a way to control smtpd_recipient_restrictions on a per-domain
> basis so I can relax some of these restrictions for cases like this,
> instead of a more reactive approac
On 2023-05-16 at 12:19:03 UTC-0400 (Tue, 16 May 2023 18:19:03 +0200)
Víctor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
For example for imap/pop login failures dovecot log email account that
produces the failure.
If you are using Dovecot for SASL and have auth_verbose enabled
On 2023-05-16 at 21:09:35 UTC-0400 (Wed, 17 May 2023 09:09:35 +0800)
Tom Reed via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
Since the message was sent to mailing list which rewrites envelope
address
and adds list signature, so:
1) SPF for header From: address won't get pass due to SRS.
2) D
On 2023-05-22 at 08:36:49 UTC-0400 (Mon, 22 May 2023 14:36:49 +0200
(CEST))
Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
My world is only a very small subset of the real world :), but in that
world, if I say that a given server is the MX for a domain, then
that's that, it should
On 2023-05-22 at 19:53:11 UTC-0400 (Tue, 23 May 2023 07:53:11 +0800)
Tom Reed via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
PS: Why do you (think you) need a backup MX?
Hello
I am not sure why I need a backup mx indeed,
If you don't know why you want the added complexity, you do not want th
On 2023-05-24 at 09:50:08 UTC-0400 (Wed, 24 May 2023 13:50:08 +)
Ken Peng via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
If the MX hostname has only IPv6 resolved,
does it have problems in mail functions?
Yes.
Not all sending systems have IPv6 addresses or connectivity. If your
inbound mail
On 2023-05-26 at 07:05:09 UTC-0400 (Fri, 26 May 2023 13:05:09 +0200)
Paul Menzel via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Dear Postfix folks,
Apple Mail violates the standard [1],
That's no "standard" that's a Mozilla Inc. bug report.
There is no violation of standards here, there is onl
On 2023-06-08 at 20:39:21 UTC-0400 (Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:39:21 -0700
(PDT))
Richard Troy via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi All,
This is my first posting here, and maybe I should have found this WAY
back in January, '23, if not LONG before. Surely background will help:
Maybe, but
On 2023-06-12 at 04:19:12 UTC-0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:19:12 +1200)
Peter via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Technically it's an invalid MX record because MX records must point to a
> hostname, not an IP address.
>
> They are probably trying (but failing) to implement a null MX record
On 2023-07-10 at 04:10:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:10:32 +0100)
Chris Green via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I run simple Postfix setups on a number of systems, these are all
systems which only have a very few users, two or three at the most.
I want to add IMAP/POP3 access to on
On 2023-07-10 at 05:34:44 UTC-0400 (Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:34:44 +0100)
Ken Gillett via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
It is many years since I set up postfix on my Mac server and it's use
is now purely for local email, i.e. users on home network. However I
have some issues with this and
On 2023-07-10 at 12:42:24 UTC-0400 (Mon, 10 Jul 2023 17:42:24 +0100)
Ken Gillett via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
From where is postconf getting its information? Does it have a config
directory hard coded?
Yes. Note:
# strings
/Applications/Server.app/Contents/ServerRoot/usr/sbin
On 2023-07-31 at 02:43:28 UTC-0400 (Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:43:28 +0200)
Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users <400the...@gmx.ch>
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I am using Maildir format on my server (Postfix + Dovecot).
The individual filenames have this format:
1690633510.M94611123819.mail,
On 2023-07-31 at 09:34:47 UTC-0400 (Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:34:47 +0200)
Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users <400the...@gmx.ch>
is rumored to have said:
On 2023-07-31 15:09, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2023-07-31 at 02:43:28 UTC-0400 (Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:43:28 +0200)
1690
On 2023-08-09 at 03:40:20 UTC-0400 (Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:40:20 +0200)
Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users <400the...@gmx.ch>
is rumored to have said:
On 2023-08-09 07:58, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 07:34:48AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat via
Postfix-users wrote
On 2023-08-12 at 09:47:57 UTC-0400 (Sat, 12 Aug 2023 09:47:57 -0400)
pgnd via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
in
postconf mail_version
mail_version = 3.8.1
i just caught the following TLS error in postfix logs,
2023-08-12T09:33:07.064713-04:00 cmx0024 postfix
On 2023-08-14 at 17:23:34 UTC-0400 (Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:23:34 -0400)
Alex via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
I have what appears to be a complicated mail loop problem that I can't
figure out. I suspect that their receiving system (M365) is somehow
reinjecting the message back to our
On 2023-08-14 at 15:13:54 UTC-0400 (Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:13:54 -0300)
SysAdmin EM via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi, Is it possible to discard an email based on the Subject and the
destination email address?
I try this and not work:
/^Subject:.*Test email subject .*To:.*m...@me.com
On 2023-08-15 at 21:52:52 UTC-0400 (Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:52:52 -0400)
Alex via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
Yes, it is a loop. The loop occurs inside MS365. Apparently Microsoft
does not understand how to get mail from CompanyA to CompanyB
internally, so they follow the DNS.
b
On 2023-08-22 at 09:32:11 UTC-0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:32:11 +0200)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
so far all SMTP RFCs have specified that hostname specified in HELO
needs NOT to match the result of client IP's hostname lookup.
I think there's a problem wi
On 2023-08-23 at 05:22:21 UTC-0400 (Wed, 23 Aug 2023 03:22:21 -0600)
IUL Support via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi All,
Have a legacy server that I've just taken over maintaining. It's set
up
with postfix that handles a small handful of email users. In looking
through the logfi
may only be bouncing messages sent by reckless spammers who use VERP
only because that's what their tools do, and their spamming gets their
accounts killed or filled before their giant piles of spam have fully
delivered.
-----Original Message-
From: Bill Cole via Postfix-users
Sent:
On 2023-09-03 at 16:03:02 UTC-0400 (Sun, 3 Sep 2023 22:03:02 +0200)
roughnecks via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Hello, first time here.
>
> I'm struggling with an issue for a .space domain which gets triggered by
> Spamassassin as PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD (Unthrustworty TLDs). Gmail is reje
On 2023-09-03 at 19:05:41 UTC-0400 (Mon, 4 Sep 2023 01:05:41 +0200)
roughnecks via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Il 03/09/2023 22:34, mailmary--- via Postfix-users ha scritto:
> >
> > maybe spamassassin is reading your vCard (.vcf) which has the following
> string:
> >
> > URL
On 2023-09-05 at 13:31:06 UTC-0400 (Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:31:06 -0400)
Bill Cole via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> 6. Many years of BAD operation has sent a steady trickle of poor innocents
> here and to the SA Bugzilla making false assertions like yours above and
> wasting e
On 2023-09-10 at 04:28:38 UTC-0400 (Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:28:38 +0700)
Jesper Hansen via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
Then, about an hour later, I got this message to postaster@mydomain:
- Transcript of session follows -
... Deferred: Connection timed
out with reception
On 2023-09-11 at 12:15:10 UTC-0400 (Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:15:10 -0700
(PDT))
Fred Morris via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Looks like you've got the general idea.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Jesper Hansen via Postfix-users wrote:
[...]
All the non port 25 tests, took about 15-27 hops.
But t
On 2023-09-14 at 10:08:42 UTC-0400 (Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:08:42 -0400
(EDT))
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
That appears to be a different use case: you are not originating a
message for some recipient on the Internet, instead you appear to
be using Postfix to forward a
On 2023-09-18 at 12:33:31 UTC-0400 (Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:33:31 -0400)
Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Any lookup by rspamd happens *after* Postfix has accepted the message
and passed it to milters.
That is not how milters work.
Postfix passes the message data to the
On 2023-09-20 at 11:07:07 UTC-0400 (Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:07:07 -0400)
Joey J via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Hello All,
>
> I have been getting a ton of pipelining errors over the past few weeks and
> I can't figure out why.
> It keeps saying queue write error, but disk & cpu performa
On 2023-10-06 at 08:11:13 UTC-0400 (Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:11:13 +)
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
We have mail coming from one of our servers that gets a spam score of
8 and gets blocked.
Is it possible to tweak the configuration of postfix
On 2023-10-12 at 08:26:40 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:26:40 +1100)
Matthew J Black via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 12/10/2023 23:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
If the 'find' command cannot enumerate mode 755 directories, then
this is no longer a problem that receive
On 2023-11-02 at 04:49:37 UTC-0400 (Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:49:37 +0200)
Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to
spamassassin(with a score and a tag).
No
On 2023-11-09 at 17:50:20 UTC-0500 (Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:50:20 -0500)
Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hey folks,
I'm trying (for the first time) to add two virtual domains for
publishing to my long-time-stable postfix-3.8.2 installation.
[...]
If I:
babylon5:alaric
On 2023-11-09 at 20:25:44 UTC-0500 (Thu, 9 Nov 2023 20:25:44 -0500)
Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Agh. I've been looking at mail.log on the wrong machine ALL ALONG
.
Isn't that what I said ?
kill me now
Nah, just a little told-ya-so.
--
Bill Cole
b..
On 2023-11-11 at 12:26:18 UTC-0500 (Sat, 11 Nov 2023 17:26:18 +)
Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello all,
I am running Postfix 3.8.1. Postfix serves port 25 for incoming mail
from other MTAs and port 587 for authenticated MUAs.
Postfix is supposed to check SP
On 2023-11-11 at 12:58:04 UTC-0500 (Sat, 11 Nov 2023 17:58:04 +)
Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Am Samstag, 11. November 2023, 18:51:04 CET schrieb Bill Cole via
Postfix-users:
Nope. Review the restriction list docs. PERMIT only short-circuits
the
current
On 2023-11-20 at 13:04:06 UTC-0500 (Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:04:06 +0100)
Joseph Castry via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
I’m trying to activate spamassassin over postix.
My firewall is deactivated
My master.cf file :
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
On 2023-11-21 at 09:38:35 UTC-0500 (Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:38:35 +)
Paul Enlund via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi
I have an odd error in yesterdays mail.log. This is a one off and
cannot be replicated
Nov 20 15:48:03 kanuka postfix/smtpd[3566272]: connect from
host.verypinktig
On 2023-11-22 at 09:40:48 UTC-0500 (Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:40:48 +0100)
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
* Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users:
Maybe it wasn't rebooted until now? (as PXE is a boot-related
feature) :)
I am positive that I personally rebooted this server a
On 2023-11-27 at 17:55:32 UTC-0500 (Mon, 27 Nov 2023 22:55:32 +)
Vijay S Sarvepalli via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello Postfix community,
This may be a feature request. As far as I can tell it is currently
not possible to verify if an authenticated user has sent email that
On 2023-11-28 at 06:15:47 UTC-0500 (Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:15:47 +)
Linkcheck via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
The dmarc results are ambiguous:
r
That's not a result, that's part of the DMARC policy
pass
although dkim fails both tests.
So, DKIM signatures are failing.
On 2023-11-28 at 06:21:14 UTC-0500 (Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:21:14 +)
Linkcheck via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
If it's only "largely redundant" I would expect G to possibly ignore
it but not fail on it.
The expectations of others are known to be poor predictors of GMail
behavior.
On 2023-11-30 at 08:03:09 UTC-0500 (Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:03:09 +0100)
Alexander Leidinger via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
There is something strange with delivering mail from my mailserver to
github, it complains about the github server certificate not verified
on an outgoing T
On 2023-12-06 at 04:00:21 UTC-0500 (Wed, 6 Dec 2023 01:00:21 -0800)
Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I just upgraded FreeBSD from 13.2 to 14.0. Postfix just picked up and
ran fine. However postsrsd is causing me a few issues. I get the
impression that postsrsd got upda
On 2023-12-10 at 16:16:27 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:16:27 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 21:53:
2. the "own Received" header not being passed to milter. I
understand
it works as expected, but co
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
efficiency?
No, but the "fix" here would be a divergence from how Milter has worked
since i
On 2023-12-11 at 09:37:39 UTC-0500 (Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:37:39 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
On 2023-12-13 at 04:27:24 UTC-0500 (Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:27:24 +1100)
lists--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I have a user with an 'old' printer/scanner who wants to scan/email
scans
from the home located device
printer offers:
machine email address:
SMTP server:
SMTP server port:
On 2023-12-13 at 13:06:36 UTC-0500 (Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:06:36 +0100)
Jiri Bourek via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> On 11. 12. 23 1:04, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>> Confirmed. A premiminary fix is below. This will prepend the
>> Received-SPF from the policy service after
On 2023-12-17 at 09:27:36 UTC-0500 (Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:27:36 -0800
(PST))
saunders.nicholas--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
How is this header populated?
X-Google-Original-From: nicho...@mordor.saundersconsulting.tech
By Google. Exactly what their algorithm is for it is not k
On 2023-12-18 at 11:31:47 UTC-0500 (Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:31:47 +)
Vijay S Sarvepalli via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello Viktor, Wietse,
(I am copying the Postfix community as the report is out in the public
now)
First of all thank you for your help and response to highlight
On 2023-12-18 at 17:15:16 UTC-0500 (Mon, 18 Dec 2023 23:15:16 +0100)
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote in
<6039ed61-2c8f-4a12-b736-994d32632...@billmail.scconsult.com>:
|On 2023-12-17 at 09:27:36 UTC-0500 (Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06
On 2023-12-31 at 05:56:49 UTC-0500 (Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:56:49 +0100)
Togan Muftuoglu via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
But then reading man lmtp(8) it says lmtp is expected to be configured
in master.cf. What am I configuring and how do I do is as there is no
lmtp server running on th
On 2024-01-04 at 11:15:17 UTC-0500 (Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:15:17 +0100)
Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
My point was not about SMTP smuggling, but about potentially revealing
DISCARD rules to the outside world (since they cause later rules to be
skipped entirely). Eg. a
On 2024-01-10 at 10:12:26 UTC-0500 (Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:12:26 +0200)
Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
and this causes legitimate mail to be discarded (actual mail addresses
modified above).
My question in this case: If I understand right, it seems that
postscre
On 2024-01-15 at 04:15:53 UTC-0500 (Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:15:53 +0100)
Admin Beckspaced via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
somoene is trying to use your postfix as http proxy server.
Looks like security scanner.
do you know the type of encoding?
The encoding for the log is octal: chara
On 2024-01-22 at 12:42:08 UTC-0500 (Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:42:08 -0500)
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:44:40AM -0300, Taco de Wolff via
Postfix-users wrote:
[...]
Has this something to do with FIPS mode? I don't think so because the
ciphers
On 2024-01-22 at 14:16:31 UTC-0500 (Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:16:31 -0300)
Taco de Wolff via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Regarding MTA-MTA connections, it seems I didn't fully understand it.
I was
surprised that port 25 (unencrypted) was used for all mail traffic,
but
surely (and hopefull
On 2024-01-25 at 11:58:56 UTC-0500 (Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:58:56 -0500)
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
- Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the
spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multiple
recipients after "-u".
It doesn't. T
On 2024-01-31 at 03:32:20 UTC-0500 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:32:20 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 30.01.24 20:20, Israel britto via Postfix-users wrote:
hello, I'm having a problem with spamhaus that I don't know how to
solve.
Today I have 1 domain that
On 2024-01-30 at 17:56:16 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 23:56:16 +0100)
Jonas Vautherin via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
My understanding of a "folding white space" from (amongst others)
RFC2822 [3] is
that it implies a carriage return (CRLF), and it is *not* the same
thing as a
white
o.com.br mail is handled by 20 mx.b.locaweb.com.br.
# host 186.202.157.79
Host 79.157.202.186.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
On 31.01.24 09:43, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
So if your load balancer isn't at 186.202.157.79, the hosts behind it
should not be announcing t
On 2024-02-03 at 08:52:17 UTC-0500 (Sat, 3 Feb 2024 05:52:17 -0800)
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> All,
>
> Pretty simple question:
>
> We have an internal domain, zimbra.example.org, but it's only used for
> internal routing of our corporate mail (there's a master deli
On 2024-02-08 at 16:05:16 UTC-0500 (Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:05:16 -0800)
Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I implemented postscreen quite a while ago. I don't see where or how
it introduces a delay to force the originating MTA to queue and try
later.
If you enable the tests
On 2024-02-10 at 18:33:29 UTC-0500 (Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:33:29 -0800)
Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> I used Viktor's collate to trace a specific email handling. There were a
> number of these entries. However, I am only showing 2 of them:
>
> Feb 10 03:15:40 mail postf
On 2024-02-12 at 07:07:03 UTC-0500 (Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:07:03 +0100)
Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I haven´t seen this before, but at present my mail server is kind of
alternating between mail.example.com and the real hostname (or someone
is spoofing my IP-addre
On 2024-02-24 at 10:43:36 UTC-0500 (Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:43:36 -0800
(PST))
lists--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=15
I get your point but this is for a different blocking list. That is
spamcop and spamassassin have different blocking lists.
What
On 2024-02-27 at 16:39:54 UTC-0500 (Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:39:54 -0800
(PST))
lists--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I have a sender_checks file but I don't see that on the postfix.org
website. Is that a deprecated parameter?
The names of Postfix map files are up to you. Their usag
On 2024-02-28 at 10:04:05 UTC-0500 (Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:04:05 +)
Nuno Catarino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Hi there, i'm using leap 15.5, trying to send emails thru gmail relay and
> getting crazy.
> Send my configuration for someone to help me
> when i'm trying to send the e
On 2024-02-28 at 14:38:41 UTC-0500 (Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:38:41 -0600)
Scott Techlist via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I need to allow a domain to bypass my RBL checks. I'm doing something
wrong, or I'm misunderstanding what I'm checking from my logs. I'd be
grateful for an assist to
On 2024-03-02 at 04:45:53 UTC-0500 (Sat, 2 Mar 2024 10:45:53 +0100)
Gerben Wierda via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Aliases are nice, to receive mail. But when you reply, the address
behind the alias is exposed.
To prevent that I need to create full mailboxes, which requires a lot
o
On 2024-03-15 at 14:11:03 UTC-0400 (Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:11:03 -0500)
Matt Saladna via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I'm seeking a workaround for Microsoft's litany of IPs landing on
DNSBL. They'd like all mail irrespective of DNSBL status to be
delivered, which requires a ski
On 2024-03-17 at 05:55:43 UTC-0400 (Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:55:43 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 15.03.24 15:06, Noel Jones via Postfix-users wrote:
Postscreen by design only looks at the IP, and has no mechanism to
consider other envelope data.
The s
On 2024-03-17 at 10:38:27 UTC-0400 (Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:38:27 -0500)
Paxton Houston via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
i'm trying to set up a mail server using postfix. i currently have a
squarespace domain and are using mailutils to send the email. do i
need to
set up some kinda dns
On 2024-03-19 at 02:10:53 UTC-0400 (Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:10:53 +0100)
Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users <400the...@ik.me>
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I am running postfix server for my personal use.
On the server, I have one unix user, and multiple aliases defined in
/etc/aliases, so tha
On 2024-03-28 at 17:38:38 UTC-0400 (Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:38:38 -0400)
Alex via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
HI,
I've set up a domain with a catch-all to deliver emails to any address
to a
single recipient address by specifying it in my virtual_alias_maps.
However, the user wants to
On 2024-04-10 at 05:46:36 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:46:36 +0800)
Mr. Peng via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> I have been using spamhaus, spamcop, sorbs as the RBL providers for
> antispam.
> But some of the customers speak to me about the FP issues caused by RBL.
> Do you think the
. Were I to
set up a new mail system today without legacy reliance on SA, I would
probably try using rspamd just to learn about it.
Regards.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:23 PM Bill Cole via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
On 2024-04-10 at 05:46:36 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Ap
On 2024-04-11 at 05:10:45 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:10:45 +0200)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
>> Στις 11/4/24 10:59, ο/η Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users έγραψε:
>>> It still works, but you may need supplementary software as amavis, sagator,
>>> s
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
