Hello
Postfix's documentation for the tls_high_cipherlist parameter states to see the output of the command 'postconf -d' to see the default setting.
Sadly, the documentation lacks specificness, and the output spit out about 500 lines, so I am not sure what I am suppose to be looking at.
On Mon, 1 May 2023, Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello
Postfix's documentation for the tls_high_cipherlist parameter states to see
the output of the command 'postconf -d' to see the default setting.
Sadly, the documentation lacks specificness, and the output spit out about
500 lines
Hello
Regarding the smtp_tls_verify_cert_match parameter, is the configuration 'dot-nexthop' more stringent than 'nexthop'?
Thank you
Sincerely,
Kolusion
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send
On Mon, 1 May 2023, Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote:
When I open a raw socket to the remote server on port 25 using telnet, I am
able to connect and see the server announce itself, so, it is reasonable to
assume that Postfix is doing the same and timing out during the SMTP
transaction becau
The question is wrong. One is not "more-stringent" than the other, they
just check for different things.
As TLS is not mandatory for SMTP over the general internet, it's
availability is patchy at best. For the servers that do provide STARTTLS
and a certificate, what's actually on the certifica
Hello
I e-mailed the mailing list earlier on about this problem, but now I am on my
computer and I have gone over my e-mail server and VPS with a fine comb and
confirmed everything looks good.
So, I have a problem with e-mail delivery where I can receive e-mail from some
people but not others
Kolusion K via Postfix-users:
> Hello
>
>
> So I have a problem sending and receiving e-mail from some people.
>
> The problem I have sending e-mail to some people is that Postfix
> says the connection times out when attempting to connect to the
> server.
>
> This is my setup:
>
[amazing complexi
Kolusion K:
> Ok, I did what you asked and I got this:
>
> reading from file dump.txt, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked v1)
> 23:11:23.019120 IP 192.168.2.2.40415 > 47.246.137.47.smtp: Flags [S], seq
> 3300139944, win 65280, options [mss 1360,sackOK,TS val 912070706 ecr
> 0,nop,wscale 7], lengt
On 01.05.23 14:24, Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote:
E-mail server enp0s3 interface IP address: 192.168.1.2
E-mail server ppp0 interface IP address: 192.168.2.2
VPS enp6s18 interface IP address: 1.2.3.4
What could be causing my e-mail delivery problem?
your firewall rules show nopthing spe
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > Sadly, the documentation lacks specificness, and the output spit out about
> > 500 lines, so I am not sure what I am suppose to be looking at.
>
> postconf -d will print all the (default) settings, you can use
On 2023-05-01 at 04:45:37 UTC-0400 (Mon, 1 May 2023 10:45:37 +0200)
Kolusion K via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello
Postfix's documentation for the tls_high_cipherlist parameter states
to see the output of the command 'postconf -d' to see the default
setting.
Sadly, the d
I've been getting a lot of spam with Date: headers
containing future dates, typically 1 year.
I don't find any header checks that would look for
this type of message. Have I over looked it?
In the meantime I've implemented a script and procmail
rule to examine my messages. But that is post-d
On 5/1/2023 2:41 PM, Jon LaBadie via Postfix-users wrote:
I've been getting a lot of spam with Date: headers
containing future dates, typically 1 year.
I don't find any header checks that would look for
this type of message. Have I over looked it?
In the meantime I've implemented a script and
Jon LaBadie via Postfix-users:
>
> I've been getting a lot of spam with Date: headers
> containing future dates, typically 1 year.
>
> I don't find any header checks that would look for
> this type of message. Have I over looked it?
>
> In the meantime I've implemented a script and procmail
> r
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:41:37PM -0400, Jon LaBadie via Postfix-users wrote:
> I've been getting a lot of spam with Date: headers
> containing future dates, typically 1 year.
>
> I don't find any header checks that would look for
> this type of message. Have I over looked it?
>
> In the meant
Hi,
I have postscreen implemented on postfix-3.7.3 on fedora37, and not sure I
understand if it's working properly. Sometimes I see the postscreen/dnsblog
combination ending with a simple DISCONNECT. In this case, it met the
8-point threshold to be rejected, but appears to only received a DISCONNE
16 matches
Mail list logo
