Am 01.12.2011 08:35, schrieb DN Singh:
> Hello Group,
>
> I am trying some extra configuration for postfix where it would mark
> some destinations as undeliverable. I have found that there are some
> destinations, start deferring the mails (may be greylisting) for a
> particular period of time (ti
Thanks for the suggestion Robert, but how do I find the time for which
Postfix will not attempt a delivery after reaching the fail limit? Instead
of outsourcing the task to script, and increasing a dependency, it would be
better to keep it with Postfix itself, if possible.
If there aren't any opti
On 2011-12-01 02:39, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 08:38:13PM -0500, Vladimir Parkhaev wrote:
Augment this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access,
reject_unauth_destination,
permit
As follows (and avoi
On 2011-11-29 04:15, Roger Goh wrote:
Yes, understand the syntax/example mutt& nail that Jeroen&
Noel provided but sendmail.cf will need to be configured.
...why ?
Are you using sendmail, or are you using postfix ?
--
J.
On 2011-12-01 08:35, DN Singh wrote:
Hello Group,
I am trying some extra configuration for postfix where it would mark
some destinations as undeliverable. I have found that there are some
destinations, start deferring the mails (may be greylisting) for a
particular period of time (times rangi
Yes Jeroen,
That is the case. I am suffering backlog of mails to one domain, due to its
deferral policy. This is why I want to handle it manually. Could you help
in the matter?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-12-01 08:35, DN Singh wrote:
>
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> I
Hello
Would it be possible to use a "corporate" DNSBL with postscreen ?
It is for internal use only of course.
Infos, links, welcome.
Thanks
Le 12/01/2011 10:32 AM, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
Would it be possible to use a "corporate" DNSBL with postscreen ?
It is for internal use only of course.
Infos, links, welcome.
Thanks
Sorry for the noiss ... I found an HOWTO
http://www.kloth.net/internet/dnsbl-howto.php
* Frank Bonnet :
> Hello
>
> Would it be possible to use a "corporate" DNSBL with postscreen ?
Yes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | F
hello list,
i set in my main.cf
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
but in the logfiles i find this:
Dec 1 08:25:05 fallbackhost postfix/smtp[1204]: warning: unsupported
SASL client implementation: cyrus
Dec 1 08:25:05 fallbackhost postfix/smtp[1204]: fatal: SA
* Marko Weber :
> hello list,
>
> i set in my main.cf
>
> smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
>
> but in the logfiles i find this:
>
> Dec 1 08:25:05 fallbackhost postfix/smtp[1204]: warning: unsupported SASL
> client implementation: cyrus
smtp != smtpd
--
Ral
Hi,
Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubuntu
10.04LTS (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
Because of the migration we have to shutdown the MySQL server to make a
full dump of it and import is on the new mailserver. In
Hello,
Does anyone have any low-end/low-budget backup suggestions for user mail
spools? Consider hobby type scenarios or small businesses with a cheap single
hard drive rented (dedicated/shared) server where there may not be budget for
another server or paid backup service.
My thought was if
DN Singh:
> Yes Jeroen,
>
> That is the case. I am suffering backlog of mails to one domain, due to its
> deferral policy. This is why I want to handle it manually. Could you help
> in the matter?
If you have backlogs for ONE domain, then Postfix built-in
mechanisms are already solving the proble
I will get more clear with an example:
yahoo.com has different rejection codes, common of which is TS01. They say,
after TS01, you aren't supposed to attempt delivery for 4 hours. But, the
problem with postfix is that, it will even after many mails getting
deferred, it does not mark the destinatio
DN Singh:
> I will get more clear with an example:
>
> yahoo.com has different rejection codes, common of which is TS01. They say,
> after TS01, you aren't supposed to attempt delivery for 4 hours. But, the
According to "Yahoo! Postmaster Help Topics", TS01 means:
* We are seeing unusual traffic
It is much easier that I thought. :)
Thank you.
Quoting Viktor Dukhovni (postfix-us...@dukhovni.org):
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 08:38:13PM -0500, Vladimir Parkhaev wrote:
>
> Augment this:
>
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > check_recipient_access hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access,
>> Noel provided but sendmail.cf will need to be configured.
> ...why ?
> Are you using sendmail, or are you using postfix ?
I need to send mails out from an RHES4.x box (which does
not have Postfix installed & sendmail is not supposed to be
started as it's hardened for security reason). This box
On 1 December 2011 04:56, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
> Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubuntu 10.04LTS
> (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
>
> Because of the migration we have to shutdown the MySQL server to
On 12/01/2011 04:56 AM, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
> Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubuntu
> 10.04LTS (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
You might consider enabling the backport repository that provides
Pos
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Simon Brereton <
simon.brere...@buongiorno.com> wrote:
> On 1 December 2011 04:56, Roland de Lepper
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
> > Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubu
Am 01.12.2011 16:02, schrieb Simon Brereton:
> On 1 December 2011 04:56, Roland de Lepper wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
>> Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubuntu 10.04LTS
>> (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
use backports
I was under the impression that hosts using SMTP were required to have a
valid reverse DNS entry. The reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
restriction would then enforce this requirement. However, I can't find a
basis for this in RFC 821, 2821, or 5321. The closest I can find is
helo/ehlo req
Hi Blake!
Am 2011-12-01 18:09, schrieb Blake Hudson:
> I was under the impression that hosts using SMTP were required to have a
> valid reverse DNS entry. The reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
> restriction would then enforce this requirement. However, I can't find a
> basis for this in RFC 82
On Thursday, December 1, 2011, 12:09:42, Blake Hudson wrote:
> I was under the impression that hosts using SMTP were required to have a
> valid reverse DNS entry. The reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
> restriction would then enforce this requirement. However, I can't find a
> basis for this
Hello,
We are unable to receive mail from an automated system (Intuits Payroll
Services), and have been unable to determine why.
We use an outsourced anti-spam service (webroot), so I have to rely on
what they tell me about their logs.
One thing I noticed - when I do an nslookup on
payroll
On 12/1/2011 12:26 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are unable to receive mail from an automated system (Intuits
> Payroll Services), and have been unable to determine why.
>
> We use an outsourced anti-spam service (webroot), so I have to rely
> on what they tell me about their logs.
>
On 2011-12-01 14:53, Roger Goh wrote:
Noel provided but sendmail.cf will need to be configured.
...why ?
Are you using sendmail, or are you using postfix ?
I need to send mails out from an RHES4.x box (which does
not have Postfix installed& sendmail is not supposed to be
started as it's harden
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:56:34AM +0100, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
> Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubuntu
> 10.04LTS (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
>
> Because of the migration we have to shutdown the MySQL
On 2011-12-01 10:56, Roland de Lepper wrote:
Hi,
Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
The Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in
Ubuntu 10.04LTS (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
Because of the migration we have to shutdown the MySQL server to make
a full
On 2011-12-01 12:14, email builder wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have any low-end/low-budget backup suggestions for user mail
spools? Consider hobby type scenarios or small businesses with a cheap single
hard drive rented (dedicated/shared) server where there may not be budget for
another server
On 2011-12-01 1:40 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
It appears intuit payroll services use exacttarget.com for their
mail services. Exacttarget is a legit bulk mailer, but some folks
might block exacttarget for perceived spamming. Something else to
look into anyway.
Ok, at leats thats something...
Tha
Sorry about the noob questions, but it's been 12 years or more since I stared
at Postfix...
First, is there a way to get an out-of-the-box (in my case, Postfix 2.6.6
compiled for Centos6/EPEL6) to get $mydomain and $myhostname from the
canonicalized hostname?
I.e. to do a:
gethostname(buf);
Good Day,
I'm trying to bring up a new machine that serves several purposes and
have run into a potentially Very Big Problem.
The machine has two physical interfaces, one LAN-facing and one
Internet-facing. So, naturally, I have something like:
Let's say 10.1.1.0 is the Internet-facing network
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:45:53 -0700
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Sorry about the noob questions, but it's been 12 years or more since
> I stared at Postfix...
>
> First, is there a way to get an out-of-the-box (in my case, Postfix
> 2.6.6 compiled for Centos6/EPEL6) to get $mydomain and $myhostnam
James Seymour:
> Good Day,
>
> I'm trying to bring up a new machine that serves several purposes and
> have run into a potentially Very Big Problem.
>
> The machine has two physical interfaces, one LAN-facing and one
> Internet-facing. So, naturally, I have something like:
>
> Let's say 10.1.1.
James Seymour:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:45:53 -0700
> Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
> > Sorry about the noob questions, but it's been 12 years or more since
> > I stared at Postfix...
> >
> > First, is there a way to get an out-of-the-box (in my case, Postfix
> > 2.6.6 compiled for Centos6/EPEL6)
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:07 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wrote:
[snip]
> I suggest that you use different smtp_bind_address settings in
> master.cf for the (default) smtp transport and for the (inbound)
> relay transport.
This server is, amongst other things, a mail gateway. It accepts
incoming on
James Seymour:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:07 -0500 (EST)
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> [snip]
> > I suggest that you use different smtp_bind_address settings in
> > master.cf for the (default) smtp transport and for the (inbound)
> > relay transport.
>
> This server is, amongst other things, a mail ga
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:46:00 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wrote:
> James Seymour:
> > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:07 -0500 (EST)
> > Wietse Venema wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I suggest that you use different smtp_bind_address settings in
> > > master.cf for the (default) smtp transport and for the (inbound
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:37:36 +0100, Marko Weber wrote:
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
smtpd...
but in the logfiles i find this:
Dec 1 08:25:05 fallbackhost postfix/smtp[1204]: warning: unsupported
SASL client implementation: cyrus
any ideas?
smtp vs
On 12/1/11 1:45 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Also, smtpd seems to silently ignore:
>
> submission ... smtpd ... -o inet_interfaces=127.0.0.1 in master.cf
>
> I was hoping to be able to use this to get it to listen for submissions only
> on 127.0.0.1:587... but as I said, it ignores the "-o
>
Philip Prindeville:
> > Also, smtpd seems to silently ignore:
> >
> > submission ... smtpd ... -o inet_interfaces=127.0.0.1 in master.cf
> >
> > I was hoping to be able to use this to get it to listen for submissions
> > only on 127.0.0.1:587... but as I said, it ignores the "-o
> > inet_interf
Am 01.12.2011 21:45, schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> Alternatively, is there a way to get $mydomain to initialize to something
> other
> than localdomain when "hostname" returns an uncanonicalized name?
[root@mail:~]$ cat main.cf | grep mydomain
mydomain = thelounge.net
signature.asc
Descrip
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:45:53 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
submission ... smtpd ... -o inet_interfaces=127.0.0.1 in master.cf
127.0.0.1:submission ... smtpd ...
>> Does anyone have any low-end/low-budget backup suggestions for user mail
>> spools? Consider hobby type scenarios or small businesses with a cheap
>> single
>> hard drive rented (dedicated/shared) server where there may not be budget
>> for
>> another server or paid backup service.
>>
>
Yes, I am trying some workarounds, like rate delays, to address unusual
traffic, and also joined their FBL for complainants. But, am still facing
problems with some MTAs.
Also, this only for Yahoo, there are others like hotmail, rediffmail, aol,
etc. Rediff being worst...
The only thing that I wan
Am 02.12.2011 07:02, schrieb email builder:
>>> Does anyone have any low-end/low-budget backup suggestions for user mail
>
>>> spools? Consider hobby type scenarios or small businesses with a cheap
>>> single
>>> hard drive rented (dedicated/shared) server where there may not be budget
>>> f
48 matches
Mail list logo
