Hi
My mailserver store mail in Maildir format, is possible through postfix,
mailscanner or procmail to store mail with subject filename so i can find mail
more quicly on server?
---
Valore legale alle tue mail
Inter
On 16/07/2009, at 7:01 PM, gianluca...@interfree.it wrote:
My mailserver store mail in Maildir format, is possible through
postfix, mailscanner or procmail to store mail with subject filename
so i can find mail more quicly on server?
No. But what's wrong with something like:
egrep -iRl "^
Thank you for the answer but i wanted a way to change name of messages, because
i want a directory in which i copy all incoming messages with their sbujcet
like filename.
---
Valore legale alle tue mail
InterfreePEC -
gianluca...@interfree.it ha scritto:
Thank you for the answer but i wanted a way to change name of messages, because
i want a directory in which i copy all incoming messages with their sbujcet
like filename.
you can easily pipe previous egrep commmand to do
a copy of messsage with that filena
Thanks Wietse,
my alias file entries as below
all: ramesh, john
all these days working fine, i don't know suddenly it started sending multiple
mails.
will you please give me example..
Thanks&Rgds
Ramesh.
--- On Wed, 15/7/09, Wietse Venema wrote:
From: Wietse Venema
Subject: Re: mail to alia
gianluca...@interfree.it schrieb:
> Hi
>
>
> My mailserver store mail in Maildir format, is possible through postfix,
> mailscanner or procmail to store mail with subject filename so i can find
> mail more quicly on server?
>
>
>
>
Thank you, i will make some experiment, if someone have others info please post
to me
---
Valore legale alle tue mail
InterfreePEC - la tua Posta Elettronica Certificata
http://pec.interfree.it
-
Hi People
I am having a problem and wanted a help from you. Today my server using
postfix (2.3.8-2) and also use procmail (3.22-16). I'm having trouble
using share because I do not have to return a message when an email is
sent and the box of destiny is to share Exec. Using maildirsize per
share or
Hi,
Until now I have used absolute paths when specifying fx a proxy :
config_dir = /mx1/etc/postfix
relay_recipient_maps = proxy:mysql:$config_dir/mysql/mysql-relayslacker-maps.cf
proxy:mysql:$config_dir/mysql/mysql-relayrecipient-maps.cf
I would like to av
On 7/16/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> -Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so much because I like it, but I
> don't want POP UUIDs changing or any big changes in IMAP quirks that
> suddenly cause users grief. It seems like Courier+Maildrop is fairly
> common though, so I think
Peter S?rensen:
> Hi,
>
> Until now I have used absolute paths when specifying fx a proxy :
>
> config_dir = /mx1/etc/postfix
> relay_recipient_maps =
> proxy:mysql:$config_dir/mysql/mysql-relayslacker-maps.cf
>
> proxy:mysql:$config_dir/mysql/mysql-relayrec
Hi all!
I have configured a Postfix server with amavisd and spammassassin as relay
server for several domains. All the mails sent to @example1.com and
@example2.com are received in the postfix server, and then redirected to the
real mail server for this domains.
We are receiving thousands o
* Wietse Venema :
> I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> all the configuration parameters will change, too.
"prefix"? It fixes things before they become a problem...
p...@rick
--
The Book
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Wietse Venema :
> > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> > all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>
> "prefix"? It fixes things before they become a prob
> I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>"prefix"? It fixes things before they become a problem...
>p...@rick
So simple yet so good!
I like
Antonio Navarro Navarro wrote:
Hi all!
I have configured a Postfix server with amavisd and spammassassin as
relay server for several domains. All the mails sent to @example1.com
and @example2.com are received in the postfix server, and then
redirected to the real mail server for this domai
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> * Wietse Venema :
> > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> > all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>
> "prefix"? It fixes things before they become a p
Wietse Venema wrote:
> I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>
What about an name like "trooper"?
This is in reference to:
a) A police offi
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:33:46PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> > I ran openssl test command that you provided and doesn't look like my
> cert
> > config is good.
> >
> >
> > [r...@mx01 ~]# openssl s_c
If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server ,
what are the performance impacts on that
ram:
> If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server ,
> what are the performance impacts on that
It has no impact for delivery to non-PIX systems.
Wietse
On Thursday 16 July 2009 14:41:59 ram wrote:
>
> If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server ,
> what are the performance impacts on that
Judging from today's log files on my postfix box the default configuration
enables these as needed.
Jul 16 11:36:10 servername postfix
> * Wietse Venema :
>> I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
>> name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
>> all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>
> "prefix"? It fixes things before they become a problem...
>
Great name! I l
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 09:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server ,
> > what are the performance impacts on that
>
> It has no impact for delivery to non-PIX systems.
For all outgoing mails, the mails are going through a PIX.
I had STARTTLS working for port 25 for many months with no problem. I
am using amavisd-new/spamassassin as content filter. But now, due to
port blocking, I need to set this up on port 587 so I can send mail
directly to my server with my mail client (thunderbird).
I made a change to master.cf by
* ram :
> For all outgoing mails, the mails are going through a PIX.
> Will my outgoing performance be hit then
Yes, if you have smtp_protocol_fixup on.
I recently "fixed" delivery problems on a large scale server by
simply turning that off.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilu
On Thursday 16 July 2009 15:26:01 ram wrote:
>
> For all outgoing mails, the mails are going through a PIX.
> Will my outgoing performance be hit then
The advice is usually to disable the PIX SMTP fix-up because it is buggy,
aside from issues of load. This may have security implications.
Juan Miscaro wrote:
> I had STARTTLS working for port 25 for many months with no problem. I
> am using amavisd-new/spamassassin as content filter. But now, due to
> port blocking, I need to set this up on port 587 so I can send mail
> directly to my server with my mail client (thunderbird).
>
> I
Juan Miscaro wrote:
I had STARTTLS working for port 25 for many months with no problem. I
am using amavisd-new/spamassassin as content filter. But now, due to
port blocking, I need to set this up on port 587 so I can send mail
directly to my server with my mail client (thunderbird).
...
Yet w
2009/7/16 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> Juan Miscaro wrote:
>> I had STARTTLS working for port 25 for many months with no problem. I
>> am using amavisd-new/spamassassin as content filter. But now, due to
>> port blocking, I need to set this up on port 587 so I can send mail
>> directly to my se
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Wietse Venema :
> > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> > all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>
> "p
I have been slowly building a mail gateway, mg05.
I had working sending of email from my gmail account to
rlo...@mg05.cnm.edu and via virtualaliases it was passed into the
appropriate email server.
I noticed as I populated the virtualaliases table with more and more
lines from other gateways in pr
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:33:24AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> I am reading TLS page on postfix and here
> http://www.state-of-mind.de/assets/postfix_tls.pdf.
>
> I have one last question. What I am trying to setup is, I have set of hosts
> in LAN which use postfix relay servers in DMZ to send (
With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
stopped reading. :-(
But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
How will Postfix deal with a machine that has two different names for
the same IP and multiple PTR records?
\\||/
Rod
--
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > * Wietse Venema :
> > > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> > > all the configuration paramet
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:18:07AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
> stopped reading. :-(
>
> But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
>
> How will Postfix deal with a machine that has two
Roderick A. Anderson:
> With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
> stopped reading. :-(
>
> But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
>
> How will Postfix deal with a machine that has two different names for
> the same IP and multipl
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:19:05PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >
> > > * Wietse Venema :
> > > > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > > > name than "swatter" or "halli
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:18:07AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
stopped reading. :-(
But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
How will Postfix deal with a mach
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:07:00PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> > Well, a DNS NXDOMAIN error seems a good reason for discarding mail.
>
> even NXDOMAIN may be a temporary error that the admin can fix.
This borders on sophistry. NXDOMAIN is not a transient error that resuls
from failure to obtain the ri
The postfix add-on software "smtpprox" can do exactly what you want, with a
little modification. Since smtpprox is written in perl it can adversely
affect system load, but it works very well for us and the affect on our
system load is negligible.
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
stopped reading. :-(
But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
How will Postfix deal with a machine that has two different names for
Thanks. Mor
On Thursday 16 July 2009 17:19:23 Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> People publishing multiple PTR records are IMHO misguided.
I fear the folks who wrote RFC1033 used the term "official name" for where a
reverse PTR record should point. I'm sure they meant "canonical", which I'm
assured is an outdated
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:33:24AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> > I am reading TLS page on postfix and here
> > http://www.state-of-mind.de/assets/postfix_tls.pdf.
> >
> > I have one last question. Wh
On 7/16/2009 11:56 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>>> I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
>>> name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
>>> all the configuration parameters will change, too.
>> "prefix"? It fixes things before they become a
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:52:10PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> > This is not sufficiently precise, what does "using" mean? Printing it
> > on a piece of paper and using it as bathroom wallpaper? :-)
>
> :-) Honestly I haven't spoke to them directly, just working based on using
> piece of mail I
On 7/13/09 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> all the configuration parameters will change, too.
posttriage
or if you have issues w/the French:
pos
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:23:39PM -0700, Mike Cappella wrote:
> On 7/13/09 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> > all the configuration parameters will
On Wed, July 15, 2009 19:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> openssl s_client -starttls stmp -connect 192.0.2.1:25
typo, will most likely be smtp
--
xpoint
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:23:39PM -0700, Mike Cappella wrote:
>
> > On 7/13/09 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
> > > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes,
> > > all th
Hi,
I get email forwarded to me from a FAX server that I need to process and
then forward to a different server. The ³to² email address is always in the
form of @send.fax. The FAX number could be the phone number for
any FAX machine in the country and only the �...@send.fax² is a constant.
Right
On Thursday, July 16, 2009, 16:01:57, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:23:39PM -0700, Mike Cappella wrote:
>
>> On 7/13/09 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
>> > name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me kn
On 7/16/09 1:01 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
smtp inet n - n - 1 bouncer
...
bounceunix - -
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:14:06PM -0700, Mike Cappella wrote:
On 7/16/09 1:01 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
smtp inet n
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:14:06PM -0700, Mike Cappella wrote:
> On 7/16/09 1:01 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
>> the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
>>
>> smtp inet n -
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
smtp inet n - n - 1 bouncer
...
bounceunix
I have to relay my mail through an SMTP server that uses authentication.
I think I have Postfix configured correctly, but messages I send out get
queued with this error:
90EC0137A88 337 Thu Jul 16 19:12:09 u...@myhostname.foocorp.net
(SASL authentication failed; cannot authenticate
* Rob Tanner wrote:
> I get email forwarded to me from a FAX server that I need to process and
> then forward to a different server. The ³to² email address is always in the
> form of @send.fax. The FAX number could be the phone number for
> any FAX machine in the country and only the �...@send.f
* Stefan Förster wrote:
> /(.*)@fax.send/ local...@my.domain,${1}final.mailserver
/(.*)@fax.send/ local...@my.domain,$...@final.mailserver
The "@" was missing.
* tho...@zaph.org :
> I have to relay my mail through an SMTP server that uses authentication.
>
> I think I have Postfix configured correctly, but messages I send out get
> queued with this error:
>
> 90EC0137A88 337 Thu Jul 16 19:12:09 u...@myhostname.foocorp.net
> (SASL authentic
Wietse Venema wrote:
> [snip]
> It's no worse than smtp versus smtpd. If there exists a different
> name for the agent at the door, then that might work. Alas, cerberus
> is already in use (by the "kerberos" authentication system).
>
And so are "Heimdall" (KTH's implementation of Kerberos) as w
Jos? Luis Tall?n:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > [snip]
> > It's no worse than smtp versus smtpd. If there exists a different
> > name for the agent at the door, then that might work. Alas, cerberus
> > is already in use (by the "kerberos" authentication system).
> >
> And so are "Heimdall" (KTH's
Noel Jones writes:
> Dylan Martin wrote:
>> [...] I want to set up a gateway to limit email outbound.
>> I've found lots of documents about limiting inbound, but not much on
>> limiting outbound.. [...]
> [...]
> It might be useful to limit seattlecentral.edu mail to valid
> recipients, by replac
On 16-Jul-2009, at 12:24, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/16/2009 11:56 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a
better
name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name
changes,
all the configuration parameters will change, too.
"pref
Wietse Venema wrote:
"bouncer" would be good if there was not a near name collision.
Would "zbouncer" be different enough? It's a bit long, though.
Perhaps, "zombo" (zombie bouncer)?
[Charon]
Charon is not too bad. Certainly better than zzapper or zkiller
and other ugly names that I did not
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 05:21:13PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote:
> Possible substitutes include concierge or valet, or perhaps any of the less
> specific guard, sentry, sentinel, ...
I think "sentry" is short, and simple, and can even be thought of as a
contraction of "smtp" and "entry". A bit less co
On 7/16/09 6:02 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
postquack (like water off a ducks back)
But I can't beat prefix.
I like prefix too; that Ralf is very clever. postfix/postprefix might
twist one's mind.
Or, go biblical: postsmite. ;-)
Good fun.
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Stefan Förster wrote:
> * Rob Tanner wrote:
> > I get email forwarded to me from a FAX server that I need to process and
> > then forward to a different server. The ³to² email address is always in the
> > form of @send.fax. The FAX number could be the phone number for
> > a
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 05:21:13PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote:
>
> > Possible substitutes include concierge or valet, or perhaps any of the less
> > specific guard, sentry, sentinel, ...
>
> I think "sentry" is short, and simple, and can even be thought
Wietse Venema wrote:
Jose Luis Tallon:
Wietse Venema wrote:
[snip]
It's no worse than smtp versus smtpd. If there exists a different
name for the agent at the door, then that might work. Alas, cerberus
is already in use (by the "kerberos" authentication system).
And so are "Heimdall" (KTH'
* Victor Duchovni :
> The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
> the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
>
> smtp inet n - n - 1 bouncer
> ...
> bounceunix - - n -
* Wietse Venema :
> It's no worse than smtp versus smtpd. If there exists a different
> name for the agent at the door, then that might work. Alas, cerberus
> is already in use (by the "kerberos" authentication system).
And your cerberus is multi-threaded, not multi-headed.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
* Victor Duchovni :
> I think "sentry" is short, and simple, and can even be thought of as a
> contraction of "smtp" and "entry".
Not too bad.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D
* Noel Jones :
> corona
Corona, St.George, what's it with the beer names?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
r
* Michael Orlitzky :
> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus,
>
> Continuing his journey to Thebes, Oedipus encounters the Sphinx who
> would stop all those who traveled to Thebes and ask them a riddle. If
> the travelers were unable to answer correctly, they were eaten by the
> Sphinx
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Michael Orlitzky :
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus,
Continuing his journey to Thebes, Oedipus encounters the Sphinx who
would stop all those who traveled to Thebes and ask them a riddle. If
the travelers were unable to answer correctly, they were eaten
Hi Postfix-users,
Following on from my original post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg09957.html
We are now writing a Postfix Milter (in java), to forward email on in envelope
format to our Email Archive Server.
Current Config:
Fedora 11 (just for now)
postfix-2.5.6-3.
Hi!
I have
gw:/usr/sbin # /usr/bin/maildrop -v
maildrop 2.1.0 Copyright 1998-2005 Double Precision, Inc.
GDBM/DB extensions enabled.
Courier Authentication Library extension enabled.
Maildir quota extension enabled.
This program is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
License. S
78 matches
Mail list logo
