On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
smtp inet n - n - 1 bouncer
...
bounce unix - - n - 0 bounce
cause significant confusion?
It's no worse than smtp versus smtpd. If there exists a different
name for the agent at the door, then that might work. Alas, cerberus
is already in use (by the "kerberos" authentication system).
Possible substitutes include concierge or valet, or perhaps any of the
less specific guard, sentry, sentinel, ...
-Rob
