On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:14:06PM -0700, Mike Cappella wrote:
> On 7/16/09 1:01 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> The service is an SMTP "bouncer", keeping unwanted clients from entering
>> the premises. We already have a "bounce unix" service, will having:
>>
>> smtp inet n - n - 1 bouncer
>> ...
>> bounce unix - - n - 0 bounce
>>
>> cause significant confusion?
>>
>
> While I like the name, please no. Postfix support lists have had to call
> attention to "smtp" v. "smtpd" enough.
I would usually concur, but the "bounce" service is largely invisible
to users, so confusion is far less likely. You may still be right, but
it is far less significant than with smtp(8) and smtpd(8).
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
