On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM, mouss wrote:
> Simon Aquilina a écrit :
> >[snip]
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Enterting the command maildrop -V 4 -d sysad...@mydomain.com < 1
> return
> >> > the following:
> >> > base 1: No such file or directory.
> >>
> >> well, you asked it to read from a file named "1
Hi people,
I currently own a postfix/courier/mailman server and some users want to
share some large files, but I don't want these files to be sent to the
other members of the list from a given filesize. In fact, I'm looking for a
way to intercept these mails, copy the joint files in a given folde
I am on the verge of giving up on maildrop ... but ...
before that I have some more comments below ...
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:19 +0100
> From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop
>
> Simon Aquilina a écrit :
> >[snip]
> >>
> >> >
> >>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Simon Aquilina wrote:
>
> I am on the verge of giving up on maildrop ... but ...
> before that I have some more comments below ...
>
> > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:19 +0100
> > From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Subject: Re: Postfix
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:34:14 -0500
Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop
From: gejop...@gmail.com
To: mouss+nob...@netoyen.net
CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
[quote]
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM, mouss wrote:
Simon Aquilina a écrit :
>[snip]
>>
>> >
>> > Enterting the command maildrop -V
Noel Jones:
> A policy server won't really help here.
> OP should read up on the "at" command.
Agreed. Postfix is not a batch queue system. Both cron and at
already provide delayed execution including error reporting.
Wietse
ram:
> The docs at http://www.postfix.org mention several features available in
> postfix 2.6(experimental).
>
> Where is the complete changelog of postfix 2.6 available
With the Postfix 2.6 source code.
Wietse
Gejo Paul wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Simon Aquilina
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am on the verge of giving up on maildrop ... but ...
>> before that I have some more comments below ...
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:19 +0100
>> > From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
>> > To: postfix-users@
Gejo Paul wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Simon Aquilina
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am on the verge of giving up on maildrop ... but ...
>> before that I have some more comments below ...
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:19 +0100
>> > From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
>> > To: postfix-users
On 2/19/2009 8:01 AM, Gejo Paul wrote:
Gejo,
Unedited/mindless bottom posting is WORSE than top-posting.
Please snip/cut out all but the relevant text you are quoting before
clicking the send button.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2/19/09, Simon Aquilina wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:34:14 -0500
> Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop
> From: gejop...@gmail.com
> To: mouss+nob...@netoyen.net
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
> [quote]
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM, mouss wrot
Gejo Paul wrote:
>
> if you shutdown the courier-authdaemon ,IMAP authentication shouldn't
> work.
>
> But for resolving the maildrop issue you only need to wok on
> courier-authdaemon and courier-mysql pacakges .
> you should start the courier-authdaemon service for testing the maildrop
> func
Hi all,
I'm running Postfix 2.4.1 and using a After-Queue Content Filter to forward
email to a Java Application Server. Everything is running just fine for
almost about 10 months, but a strange thing has happened and i want to know
what cause it.
So, my content filter is based on the example in
h
Thanks Peter,
> > My aim, anyway, is to apply a such policy for outgoing messages
> > (including internal-to-internal messages). So I have to define a
> group
> > which contains the IPs enabled for relay through my mail server.
>
> smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service inet:foo:12
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:44:25PM -0900, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 17:50:14 Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > A policy server won't really help here.
> > OP should read up on the "at" command.
>
> Yes it will. At/cron still means the php app needs to queue, then it gets
> pass
Hello,
I am running postfix mail_version = 2.5.5 under ubuntu 8.10 server. I have
a static IP and a domain name pointed to the IP. I also have reverse IP
lookup setup for mail.myrealdomainnamehere.com to avoid being treated as a
SPAM server. (my IP and real domain names are not shown in this po
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
As I understand it's necessary to create several transports and use
transport tables, but I do not see a way how to make lookups truly random.
smtp1 unix - - n -
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 08:26 -0500, Digest of postfix-users list wrote:
> Ali Nebi a écrit :
> > [snip]
> >
> > smtpd_client_restrictions =
> > permit_mynetworks,
> > permit_sasl_authenticated,
> > check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
> you are "sharing" this map (
I'm currently using recipient_delimiter in main.cf and in
amavisd.conf, so that inbound spam (as determined by spamassassin)
adds "+Spam" to the recipient. I don't block any spam (it all gets
delivered) so I don't have to administer quarantined spam.
However, when that spam hits a mailbox
Hi again,
what is your opinion for this configuration:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
# reject_unauth_pipelining,
# reject_unknown_client,
# reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the world.
and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer Delivery
notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account name ? I
was thinking about a temporary regex to discard those notices. (
jeff donovan wrote:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the world.
and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer Delivery notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account name ? I
was thinking about a temporary regex to discard
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:33:36 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: cwo1...@hotmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix/milter added headers and header_check feature
>
> Charles Account wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found an email from Noel Jones:
>> >>At 09:51 AM 8/2/2007,
Charles Account wrote:
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:33:36 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: cwo1...@hotmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix/milter added headers and header_check feature
>
> Charles Account wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found an email from Noel Jon
Hi.
I have a postfix mailserver working as a secondary MX of a domain
(let's call it "domain.com"). The primary MX is a qmail+antivir+antispam
server that has serious memory/cpu problems to process all the email
(the one which receives by itself and the email that I sent to it).
Is there an
Somehow, out of the blue, my postfix setup is allowing relaying. I pass all
the relay tests, but a hacker has figured out how to send email through my
server without authenticating. I have checked my server for being an open
relay and all the tests are passing. The only error log entry that is
show
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:30:47PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Travis wrote:
>
> > I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
> > of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
> > line.
>
> Show logs and output of the
On 2/19/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote:
> However, when that spam hits a mailbox that has vacation enabled (the
> perl script from postfixadmin), vacation.pl sends an automatic reply
> from: first.last#example.com+s...@autoreply.example.com
>
> Is there a relatively trivial wa
I think the answer is "no" but just wanted to double-check
--
Obama Nation | It's not like I'm encrypting... it's more like I've
developed a massive entropy deficiency |
http://www.subsubpacefield.org/~travis/
If you are a spammer, please email j...@subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
Tait Grove wrote:
Somehow, out of the blue, my postfix setup is allowing relaying. I pass
all the relay tests, but a hacker has figured out how to send email
through my server without authenticating. I have checked my server for
being an open relay and all the tests are passing. The only error
Noel Jones pisze:
jeff donovan wrote:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the
world. and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer
Delivery notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account name ?
I was thinking about a tempora
On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Santiago Romero
wrote:
Hi.
I have a postfix mailserver working as a secondary MX of a domain
(let's call it "domain.com"). The primary MX is a qmail+antivir
+antispam server that has serious memory/cpu problems to process all
the email (the one which recei
The destination_concurrency_limit and rate_delay parameters can be
configured per transport. You could configure a transport map to
route all mail destined to domain.com via the example: transport,
which can be configured as a clone of the smtp transport in
master.cf. Then, specify concur
Sorry, I meant "smtp" instead of "smtpd" in the master.cf.
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
slow inet n - - - - smtp
/etc/postfix/transports:
domain1.comslow:
domain2.comslow:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
slow_destination_concurrency_limit = 1
slow_destination_rate
Hi people:
I'm trying to set up a catch-all feature in my Postfix server based on
LDAP. Here's my scenario:
- Mail Accounts with VirtualMailAccount object class
- Alias with VirtualAlias object class
How can I tell Postfix to look for users/alias and return the
catch-all address when the origina
Travis wrote:
I think the answer is "no" but just wanted to double-check
Generally one should explicitly set relay_domains. In most
cases it should be set to an empty value, ie.
relay_domains =
Unfortunately, "relay_domains = $mydestination" is a
backwards-compatible default setting that i
Artem Bokhan:
> Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
> traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
Use network address translation, to map the source IP
address+port across a range of IP addresses.
Wietse
Santiago Romero:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> Sorry, I meant "smtp" instead of "smtpd" in the master.cf.
> >
> > /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> > slow inet n - - - - smtp
> >
> > /etc/postfix/transports:
> > domain1.comslow:
> > domain2.
Can anyone help me?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:49 PM, André Lopes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.4.1 and using a After-Queue Content Filter to forward
> email to a Java Application Server. Everything is running just fine for
> almost about 10 months, but a strange thing has happened a
Wietse Venema escribió:
default_destination_rate_delay (default: 0s)
The default amount of delay that is inserted between individual deliv-
eries to the same destination; with per-destination recipient limit >
1, a destination is a domain, otherwise it is a recipient.
..
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:14 AM
> To: Tait Grove; 'Postfix users'
> Subject: Re: Hacking activity
>
> Tait Grove wrote:
> > Somehow, out of the blue,
The new 2.3 beta.
At 11:57 AM 2/19/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/19/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote:
> However, when that spam hits a mailbox that has vacation enabled (the
> perl script from postfixadmin), vacation.pl sends an automatic reply
> from: first.last#example.c
Wietse Venema пишет:
Artem Bokhan:
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
Use network address translation, to map the source IP
address+port across a range of IP addresses.
Wietse
I want to have different helo's also,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:39:42AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> You can use the ips.backscatterer.org to reject bounces (*NOT* all mail)
> from known backscatter sources. Do this in smtpd_data_restrictions for
> compatibility with sender address verification.
> # main.cf
> smtpd_data_restrictions =
I want to have different helo's also, replacing helo with firewall is not
very good idea...
We do this with a foundry switch. The ip for smtp.win.net is actually on the
foundry switch, and the switch forwards connections to a cluster of machines
on the back end.
JLA,
> secondary question, would I be better off using LMTP rather than SMTP
> for the amavisd.
With more recent versions of Postfix (2.3?) the lmtp and smtp clients
share common code, so there isn't much difference in their behaviour
regarding connection caching and persistency of connection, so
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:39:42AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
You can use the ips.backscatterer.org to reject bounces (*NOT* all mail)
from known backscatter sources. Do this in smtpd_data_restrictions for
compatibility with sender address verification.
# main.cf
smtpd_data
On 2/19/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote:
> The new 2.3 beta.
So, is spamassassin adding the appropriate header?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Joseph Mays пишет:
I want to have different helo's also, replacing helo with firewall is
not very good idea...
We do this with a foundry switch. The ip for smtp.win.net is actually on
the foundry switch, and the switch forwards connections to a cluster of
machines on the back end.
Looks l
Tait Grove wrote:
I did open a few of the messages. The user has taken over the dovecot
account. So all the emails are coming from dove...@local.servername.net
through postfix. I thought for sure an account had been compromised. Dovecot
is a local, unix user, with nologin and the account is locke
Santiago Romero:
> Wietse Venema escribi?:
> > default_destination_rate_delay (default: 0s)
> >The default amount of delay that is inserted between individual
> > deliv-
> >eries to the same destination; with per-destination recipient
> > limit >
> >1, a destination is
Bokhan Artem:
> Wietse Venema ?:
> > Artem Bokhan:
> >> Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
> >> traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
> >
> > Use network address translation, to map the source IP
> > address+port across a range of IP addresses.
Bokhan Artem:
>
I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
explain why things break the way they do, but it definitely happens. I
thought maybe some folks on the list might have some insight.
Here is the sce
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
> only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
> explain why things break the way they do, but it definitely happens. I
> thought maybe some folks on the list might have so
Wietse Venema пишет:
Bokhan Artem:
Wietse Venema ?:
Artem Bokhan:
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
Use network address translation, to map the source IP
address+port across a range of IP addresses.
Bokhan Artem:
I wa
Bokhan Artem:
> Wietse Venema ?:
> > Bokhan Artem:
> >> Wietse Venema ?:
> >>> Artem Bokhan:
> Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
> traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
> >>> Use network address translation, to map the source IP
> >>> address+port
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:20:39PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
> check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/random.pcre
>
> /etc/postfix/random.pcre
> /^(.)(.*)/FILTER smtp$1:$1$2
Regexp recipient lookups are keyed by the full user address, and the
character-
Spam assassin is configured to not add spam headers to outbound mail,
so that won't help. (I don't want to flag my own outbound mail as spam).
There's not a way to get postfix to not deliver
(reject/drop/whatever) messages based on the "From" address having an
recipient_delimiter field that in
It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear. But let me tell
you that this is referred to as "snowshoeing" as it expands your IP
footprint, and is seen in the deliverability world as a slimy thing to
do.
People do it to mitigate the effects of their IP addresses being
blacklisted. But t
I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access their
email from anywhere and then reply to those emails through the smtp server.
What kind of security should I setup?
--On Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:54 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
explain why things break the way they do, but it definitely
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> So in summary: either will do, I currently don't have strong arguments
> to prefer one over the other. Perhaps somebody from the Postfix side
> can show a preference.
If the proxy is not configured to do content-dependent selective
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Rocco Scappatura
wrote:
> Thanks Peter,
>
>> > My aim, anyway, is to apply a such policy for outgoing messages
>> > (including internal-to-internal messages). So I have to define a
>> group
>> > which contains the IPs enabled for relay through my mail server.
>>
>>
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Rich wrote:
I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access
their email from anywhere and then reply to those emails through the
smtp server.
What kind of security should I setup?
You do NOT want an open relay; read up on SASL. For email
I'm certain that you should rephrase that to:
Best way to NOT setup an open relay
Feel free to test your config against:
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
To ensure that your host isn't an open-relay to the Internet (Say hi
to "hinet" if it is)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access
their email from anywhere and then reply to those emails through the
smtp server.
What kind of security should I setup?
Configure your server with SMTP AUTH, and (optional, but
recommended) TLS.
Here's the doc
I used the term "open relay" because I don't want to limit the by setting
"mynetworks" to a couple of networks. I was thinking by using sasl and tls
I could set mynetworks to 0/0.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Rich wrote:
> I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich wrote:
> I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access their
> email from anywhere and then reply to those emails through the smtp server.
>
> What kind of security should I setup?
How about openVPN (with the vpn in mynetw
0/0 is the entire internet.
Take the approach of least privileges. The idea that laptop users VPN
in if they want to be given a free ride (no auth) etc works, since you
can place your VPN subnet into mynetworks.
Perhaps your initial posting was too ambiguous.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Ri
Peter Blair пишет:
It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear.
I understand, I just wanted to know if there is an intelligence way to bind
every ip address its own helo.
But let me tell
you that this is referred to as "snowshoeing" as it expands your IP
footprint, and is seen in t
On 2/19/2009 2:40 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
> Spam assassin is configured to not add spam headers to outbound mail, so
> that won't help. (I don't want to flag my own outbound mail as spam).
Eh? Who's talking about outbound email? Vacation.pl only executes for
inbound mail.
> There's not a wa
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bokhan Artem wrote:
> Peter Blair пишет:
>>
>> It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear.
>
> I understand, I just wanted to know if there is an intelligence way to bind
> every ip address its own helo.
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy between po
Wietse Venema пишет:
Bokhan Artem:
Now you are probably going to tell me that you actually have a
different problem again.
Yes :) The same message (or rcpt) will be always sent from the same address :)
Anyway, thanks, Wietse.
Wietse
Peter Blair пишет:
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy between postfix and the
Internet.
It's easier to write a small tcp server for tcp_table which will randomize
transport :)
smtp1 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
smtp_helo_name=smtpout1.do -o smtp_bind_a
True enough-- but that won't help your HELO matching up with the
reverse of the IP that its bound to.
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem :
> Peter Blair пишет:
>>
>> Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy between postfix and the
>> Internet.
>
> It's easier to write a small tcp server for tcp_table which wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Blair wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Rich wrote:
>> I used the term "open relay" because I don't want to limit the by setting
>> "mynetworks" to a couple of networks. I was thinking by using sasl and tls
>> I could set mynetworks to
Peter Blair пишет:
True enough-- but that won't help your HELO matching up with the
reverse of the IP that its bound to.
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem :
Peter Blair пишет:
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy between postfix and the
Internet.
It's easier to write a small tcp server for tcp_table
sim085 a écrit :
>
> Oki, I can answer this question myself. If I execute the command maildrop -V
> 4 sysadmin < /dev/null from the directory where .mailfilter exists then I
> get the error "mailfilter file isn't a regular file". Executing the same
> command from any other location will give me th
emailjohndavid a écrit :
> Hello,
> I am running postfix mail_version = 2.5.5 under ubuntu 8.10 server. I have
> a static IP and a domain name pointed to the IP. I also have reverse IP
> lookup setup for mail.myrealdomainnamehere.com to avoid being treated as a
> SPAM server. (my IP and real dom
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
>
>> So in summary: either will do, I currently don't have strong arguments
>> to prefer one over the other. Perhaps somebody from the Postfix side
>> can show a preference.
>>
>
> If the proxy is not
Jason Voorhees a écrit :
> Hi people:
>
> I'm trying to set up a catch-all feature in my Postfix server based on
> LDAP. Here's my scenario:
>
> - Mail Accounts with VirtualMailAccount object class
> - Alias with VirtualAlias object class
>
> How can I tell Postfix to look for users/alias and re
At 03:16 PM 2/19/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/19/2009 2:40 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
>I guess maybe I'm missing something, so I'll shut up now...
When mail is inbound and is spam, it gets flagged as spam by spam
assassin, and becomes addressed to , with recipient_delimiter,
user+s...@
Rich a écrit :
> I used the term "open relay" because
unfortunately for you, you can't arbitrarily redefine common terms.
"open relay" is a relay that can be used by anybody from anywhere,
including all the spammers and abusers.
what you want is called an MSA, for "Mail Submission Agent". only y
Artem Bokhan:
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses
==
Why do you want to do this?
What problem are you trying to solve?
JLA
On 2/19/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote:
> When mail is inbound and is spam, it gets flagged as spam by spam
> assassin, and becomes addressed to , with recipient_delimiter,
> user+s...@example.com
Right... so just configure spamassassin to add the x-spam header (I
can't help y
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:34 AM
> To: Tait Grove; 'postfix users list'
> Subject: Re: Hacking activity
>
> Tait Grove wrote:
> > I did open a few of
At 05:11 PM 2/19/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/19/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote:
> When mail is inbound and is spam, it gets flagged as spam by spam
> assassin, and becomes addressed to , with recipient_delimiter,
> user+s...@example.com
Right... so just configure spamas
>
> 1- reinstall the "maildrop" package (not "courier-maildrop")
> 2- once this is done, run the following commands:
>
> maildrop -v
GDBM extensions enabled.
Courier Authentication Library extension enabled.
Maildir quota extension enabled.
> ls -l /usr/bin/maildrop
-rwxr-sr-x 1 r
Hi,
Since a upgrade I made last week I've been having a very strange issue.
Whenever I send an email using my server as an SMTP (with Cyrus-SASL
authentication), all my emails are sent in double. Also, when I send an
email using Imp/Horde (Webmail), emails are also sent in double.
But what is st
Daniel C wrote:
Hi,
Since a upgrade I made last week I've been having a very strange issue.
Whenever I send an email using my server as an SMTP (with Cyrus-SASL
authentication), all my emails are sent in double. Also, when I send an
email using Imp/Horde (Webmail), emails are also sent in double
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Daniel C wrote:
> Since a upgrade I made last week I've been having a very strange issue.
> Whenever I send an email using my server as an SMTP (with Cyrus-SASL
> authentication), all my emails are sent in double. Also, when I send an
> email using Imp/Horde (Webmail), emails
Thanks everyone for the direction I needed. I am going to do sasl with
tls. Seems to be a good way to go.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:44 PM, mouss wrote:
> Rich a écrit :
> > I used the term "open relay" because
>
> unfortunately for you, you can't arbitrarily redefine common terms.
> "open rel
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem :
>>> smtp1 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
>>> smtp_helo_name=smtpout1.do -o smtp_bind_address=1.1.1.1
>>> smtp2 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
>>> smtp_helo_name=smtpout2.do -o smtp_bind_address=2.2.2.2
>>>
>>>
>
>
Hi,
Sorry for the informations missing. Here they are. This is running on a
vserver, which are behind a iptables firewall, and the local IPs are in the
range 10.0.32.0/24.
Daniel
Modification from the original master.cf
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Daniel C wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
...
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
Remove this. It is not active. See:
http://dsbl.org/
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:35 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:20:39PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf
> > check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/random.pcre
> >
> > /etc/postfix/random.pcre
> > /^(.)(.*)/ FILTER smtp$1:$1$2
>
> Rege
KLaM Postmaster пишет:
Artem Bokhan:
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses
==
Why do you want to do this?
What problem are you trying to solve?
JLA
The main reason that some systems have too high limits, so legitimate mail i
Is there any way to verify seeing the logfile if a given message is
going throught a given transport (say "slow" in my master.cf) instead of
standard "smtp" transport?
I'm not sure or I don't know how to check if the messages are being
delivered by the "slow" transport I defined :? (at least
98 matches
Mail list logo
