Frederick Reeve schrieb:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:49:46 +0100
> Magnus Bäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Monday, December 08, 2008 at 06:36 CET,
>> Frederick Reeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have a working Postfix 2.5.5 setup that uses several rbls. I would
>>> like
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:44:23PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> - fix the mysql lookup problem. your quries should not return an empty
> string. (when nothing should be returned, then return NULL, not the
> "empty string". In short '' != NULL).
>
> - what does your filter script do with mail? does it use
Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:44:23PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>> - fix the mysql lookup problem. your quries should not return an empty
>> string. (when nothing should be returned, then return NULL, not the
>> "empty string". In short '' != NULL).
>>
>> - what does your filter sc
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:52:02AM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:44:23PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> >> - fix the mysql lookup problem. your quries should not return an empty
> >> string. (when nothing should be returned, then return NULL, not the
> >> "empt
On 12/11/2008, Jakub Nadolny ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Yes, it uses sendmail command. It is common vacation.pl by Mischa Peters, but
> quite old version, I can not find newer one. What would be the best solution
> for
> postfix auto-responder which could be easily integrated with postfix admin
Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask, and an
hour of googling turned up little.
The question:
What are my options if I don't want to run a full blown mail server, and
really only want all mail delivered to a single local mbox or maildir?
There seems to be a numb
On 12/10/08 11:26 PM, jan gestre at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> I've recently configured a mail server running
> postfix+dovecot+mysql+postfixadmin, it is now in production and everything
> is working fine except for MAC Entourage mail which is a PITA IMO which says
> it doesn't support
On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:31 PM, MacShane, Tracy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.P. Trosclair
Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2008 10:32 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: mail forward based on user to specific filter then
to ano
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I've recently configured a mail server running
>> postfix+dovecot+mysql+postfixadmin, it is now in production and everything
>> is working fine except for MAC Entourage mail which is a PI
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Larry Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On 12/10/08 11:26 PM, jan gestre at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> > I've recently configured a mail server running
> > postfix+dovecot+mysql+postfixadmin, it is now in production and
> everything
> > is working fi
We have a few people using programs (mostly MS crap) that insist on
older versions of SSL rather than tls.
Internally this works okay but externally ssl gets bounced by my grey
listing. This seems to indicate that it is not actually authenticating
right but allowing it to pass internally becau
Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
>
> Yes, it uses sendmail command. It is common vacation.pl by Mischa Peters, but
> quite old version, I can not find newer one. What would be the best solution
> for
> postfix auto-responder which could be easily integrated with postfix admin and
> mysql?
you can use yo
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask, and an
> hour of googling turned up little.
>
> The question:
> What are my options if I don't want to run a full blown mail server, and
> really only want al
Gaute Amundsen wrote, at 12/11/2008 07:25 AM:
> Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask, and an
> hour of googling turned up little.
>
> The question:
> What are my options if I don't want to run a full blown mail server, and
> really only want all mail delivered to
jan gestre wrote:
Here's my dovecot.conf, as you can see plain and login auth mechanisms
are enabled:
...
auth default:
mechanisms: plain login digest-md5
My first step would be to remove digest-md5 and see if that
helps.
You mention you have another working server; the second step
is
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:14:30AM +0530, ram wrote:
> I use postfix 2.3 with cyrus-sasl for smtp-auth
>
> cyrus-sasl needs a restart every few hours ( they havent fixed the
> memory leaks )
>
> The problem is if saslauthd is momentarily unavailable , postfix cant
> (obviously) authenticate th
I thought I had this working at some point but it seems that my
outgoing emails are not being sent via TLS when offered (incoming is
fine). I can see the offer in the smtp log but no TLS session is
started. Did something get dropped from my main.cf?
smtpd_use_tls = yes
smtpd_tls_cert_file =
John Baker wrote:
We have a few people using programs (mostly MS crap) that insist on
older versions of SSL rather than tls.
Internally this works okay but externally ssl gets bounced by my grey
listing. This seems to indicate that it is not actually authenticating
right but allowing it to pa
Sorry but I put the version on. It is 2.1.5.
On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
I thought I had this working at some point but it seems that my
outgoing emails are not being sent via TLS when offered (incoming is
fine). I can see the offer in the smtp log but no TLS session i
Dennis Putnam wrote:
I thought I had this working at some point but it seems that my outgoing
emails are not being sent via TLS when offered (incoming is fine). I can
see the offer in the smtp log but no TLS session is started. Did
something get dropped from my main.cf?
smtpd_use_tls = yes
sm
Dennis Putnam wrote:
Sorry but I put the version on. It is 2.1.5.
(I misspoke earlier)
Postfix TLS support in versions prior to 2.2 was provided by a
third-party patch. Support for those versions is limited; I
would strongly encourage upgrading.
--
Noel Jones
All:
I'm seeking a contact or a referral for a Postfix hacker.
We're looking to build additional functionality, probably share
it with the community.
Someone intimately familiar with internals. Project oriented
feature development gig. Firms are okay, but highly motivated
individ
Noel Jones escribió:
> Jesús Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> My system specs:
>> Gentoo Linux
>> Postfix 2.5.5
>>
>> I have the problem below:
>>
>> When using TLS postfix sometimes (most the times) disconnects the
>> client just after it issues the RCPT command.
>>
>> When I try to re
Thanks. Unfortunately, at this time upgrading is not an option (long
story) in the short term. We will be upgrading in late spring 09
(hopefully) but in the mean time I badly need a solution now. As I
said enforced TLS is not possible but I do need at least opportunistic
TLS.
On Dec 11, 2
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
So I setup a filter for stripping the attachments. I want to route
mail based on [EMAIL PROTECTED] through this filter before it is passed
on to domain's MX address. I think it's possible by using
transport_maps and some tricks in master.cf, at least thats what I was
Dennis Putnam wrote:
Thanks. Unfortunately, at this time upgrading is not an option (long
story) in the short term. We will be upgrading in late spring 09
(hopefully) but in the mean time I badly need a solution now. As I said
enforced TLS is not possible but I do need at least opportunistic TL
Thanks. You should have offered a warranty and charged for it. :) That
did it. :D
On Dec 11, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Dennis Putnam wrote:
Thanks. Unfortunately, at this time upgrading is not an option
(long story) in the short term. We will be upgrading in late spring
09 (hop
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
So I setup a filter for stripping the attachments. I want to route
mail based on [EMAIL PROTECTED] through this filter before it is
passed on to domain's MX address. I think it's possible by using
transport_maps and some tricks in master.cf, at
Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
server)to authenticate agains the webmail, and then sending mail from
"UK LOTTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"...crap!!
Since i have
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:32:52PM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
> Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
> send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
> server)to authenticate agains the webmail, and then sending mail from
> "UK LOTTO <
Gerardo Herzig wrote, at 12/11/2008 12:32 PM:
> Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
> send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
> server)to authenticate agains the webmail, and then sending mail from
> "UK LOTTO "...crap!!
>
> Sinc
J.P. Trosclair a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've got a user that wants their mail forwarded to their blackberry
> account. No big deal. The catch is they want attachments stripped first.
> I've found this tool called renattach that does just that. I set this up
> in main.cf:
>
> renattachunix-
mouss a écrit :
> J.P. Trosclair a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got a user that wants their mail forwarded to their blackberry
>> account. No big deal. The catch is they want attachments stripped first.
>> I've found this tool called renattach that does just that. I set this up
>> in main.cf:
>>
>> re
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>
> All:
>
> I'm seeking a contact or a referral for a Postfix hacker.
>
> We're looking to build additional functionality, probably share
> it with the community.
If you want to share the results with the community, and
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:32:52PM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>
>> Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
>> send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
>> server)to authenticate agains the webmail, and then s
Gerardo Herzig wrote, at 12/11/2008 12:47 PM:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> Change the password for the compromised account. Or do you offer free
>> sign-up?
>
> Well, yes, that an option. But seems like a partial solution. About the
> postfix configuration: There is anything i can do to avoid an ac
Gerardo Herzig wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:32:52PM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
>>> send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
>>> server)to au
Gerardo Herzig a écrit :
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:32:52PM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
>>> send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
>>> server)to authenticate
Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
>
> Really the only thing that can be done on the postfix side is to
> implement smtpd_sender_login_maps and
> reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch (or similar).
> This is a matter of policy as any matches with invalid results will be
> rejected.
>
> See
Now that I have TLS working in both directions I thought it would be
interesting to see if I can get enforced TLS to work also. It seems
that the 3rd party postfix extension to version 2.1.5 supposedly
supports that possibility, contrary to my previous understanding.
I seem to have a sembla
On Thursday 11 December 2008 17:22:35 Jorey Bump wrote:
> Gaute Amundsen wrote, at 12/11/2008 07:25 AM:
> > Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask,
> > and an hour of googling turned up little.
> >
> > The question:
> > What are my options if I don't want to run a ful
Roland Plüss a écrit :
> I tried to find one of the messages in the logs. It's damn hard to find
> it since it's really weird... and it all makes no sense to me. I think
> this email source belongs to the logs below ( added to prevent
> potential damage due to fudged HTML ).
>
Do not edit logs,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:28:02PM -0500, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> Now that I have TLS working in both directions I thought it would be
> interesting to see if I can get enforced TLS to work also. It seems
> that the 3rd party postfix extension to version 2.1.5 supposedly
> supports that possi
Thanks. It was only a hope. Having opportunistic TLS working is
sufficient until we can upgrade.
On Dec 11, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:28:02PM -0500, Dennis Putnam wrote:
Now that I have TLS working in both directions I thought it would be
interestin
Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
server)to authenticate agains the webmail, and then sending mail from
"UK LOTTO "...crap!
I'd also recommend switching to a webmail package th
Terry Carmen wrote:
>
> Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the
> webmail to
> send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password
> (from my
> server)to authenticate agains the webmail, and then sending mail from
> "UK LOTTO "...crap!
>
On Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 19:25 CET,
mouss wrote:
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/mysenders
> reject_unauth_destination
> ...
>
>
> == mysenders:
> example.com OK
>
> Note that this works for the envelope sender, not the Fr
mouss wrote:
> Gerardo Herzig a écrit :
>> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:32:52PM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>>>
Hi all. Im facing a ugly situation. Some spammer is using the webmail to
send spam. The thing is, hes using an actual account/password (from my
s
Is Postfix available for or part of Sun's Solaris 10 OS as a compiled
package?
(I am using Postfix on openSuse - so it's easily installed as part of
the Yast installer - I am not as familiar with Sun/Solaris 10's
packaging/installation system).
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:04:54PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
I guess its TLS session related or something related to race conditions.
I'm using PostgreSQL and LDAP lookup tables to do user mailbox lookup and
various other things an
Bailo, John wrote:
Is Postfix available for or part of Sun's Solaris 10 OS as a compiled
package?
Check blastwave and sun freeware, afaik there is no official release
from sun. There are some guides on building SMF scripts for postfix on
solaris 10.
Ok, that could be it.
The main culprit I am trying to figure out is Entourage (I just noticed
a bunch of messages on that I should look through).
The log for it looks like this:
Dec 11 14:49:48 arnold postfix/smtpd[6341]: connect from
c-24-63-203-109.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24.63.203.109]
Dec 11
+--
| On 2008-12-11 14:41:46, Bailo, John wrote:
|
| Is Postfix available for or part of Sun's Solaris 10 OS as a compiled
| package?
|
| (I am using Postfix on openSuse - so it's easily installed as part of
| the Yast in
Bailo, John wrote:
Is Postfix available for or part of Sun’s Solaris 10 OS as a compiled
package?
(I am using Postfix on openSuse – so it’s easily installed as part of
the Yast installer – I am not as familiar with Sun/Solaris 10’s
packaging/installation system).
CONFIDENTIALITY
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
>Full log with strace is now in [1]postfix-strace.txt
>
> References
>
>Visible links
>1. http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/postfix-strace.txt
This is still the old log from Dec 9th. Please post just otherwis
Jesús Manuel Loaiza Vidal escribió:
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:04:54PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
I guess its TLS session related or something related to race conditions.
I'm using PostgreSQL and LDAP lookup tables to do
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Full log with strace is now in [1]postfix-strace.txt
References
Visible links
1. http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/postfix-strace.txt
This is still the old lo
On Thursday 11 December 2008 17:21:54 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask,
> > and an hour of googling turned up little.
> >
> > The question:
> > What are my options if I
How about this?
Even more off topic!
But so far this seems to work for me.
Kmail "could not write lockfile" when reading the mbox, but "FCNTL" worked,
whatever that means :)
Considerable room for improvement I'm sure, but in principle?
Suggestions welcome :)
Gaute
/usr/bin/sendmail:
#!/usr/bi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:41:46PM -0500, Bailo, John wrote:
> Is Postfix available for or part of Sun's Solaris 10 OS as a compiled
> package?
Build Postfix from source, and then create a package out of that.
Attached a script I used to use to build the "prototype" and "pkginfo" files
for an Sv
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:34:31PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> How about this?
> Even more off topic!
>
> But so far this seems to work for me.
> Kmail "could not write lockfile" when reading the mbox, but "FCNTL" worked,
> whatever that means :)
> Considerable room for improvement I'm sure,
I only enclosed the HTML tags in the email body with comment marks. The
logs are unaltered except hidding one email address.
What goes for zen.spamhaus.org... I've got this one in my config... but
it seems to not work ( host not found ).
mouss wrote:
> Roland Plüss a écrit :
>
>> I tried to fi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:25:11PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
>Victor Duchovni escribio:
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
>
>
>
> Full log with strace is now in [1]postfix-strace.txt
>
> References
>
> Visible links
>
SASL is a problem. I tried doing it once but as soon as I enable the
entire system totally breaks. I tried various tuts and howtos but to no
avail. SASL stays broken and I can't get it working. I'm running
hardened 64bit here and postfix crashes left and right if not compiled
with a no-pie compiler
John Baker a écrit :
> Ok, that could be it.
>
> The main culprit I am trying to figure out is Entourage (I just noticed
> a bunch of messages on that I should look through).
>
> The log for it looks like this:
>
> Dec 11 14:49:48 arnold postfix/smtpd[6341]: connect from
> c-24-63-203-109.hsd1.n
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
> On Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 19:25 CET,
> mouss wrote:
>
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/mysenders
>> reject_unauth_destination
>> ...
>>
>>
>> == mysenders:
>> example.com OK
>>
>> Note that this works for
John Baker wrote:
Ok, that could be it.
The main culprit I am trying to figure out is Entourage (I just noticed
a bunch of messages on that I should look through).
The log for it looks like this:
Dec 11 14:49:48 arnold postfix/smtpd[6341]: connect from
c-24-63-203-109.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:07:47PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> The DES-CBC3-SHA 168 bit cypher seems reasonably common (here,
> nearly 10% of connections)
SSL with DES-CBC3-SHA is broken in pre-Vista version of Windows,
so if a Windows client is using the SSL support in Microsoft's
Crypto API, th
On Thursday 11 December 2008 21:38:58 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:34:31PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > How about this?
> > Even more off topic!
> >
> > But so far this seems to work for me.
> > Kmail "could not write lockfile" when reading the mbox, but "FCNTL"
> > worke
Roland Plüss a écrit :
> I only enclosed the HTML tags in the email body with comment marks. The
> logs are unaltered except hidding one email address.
>
so what logs are these? I mean, how were these logs generated?
Dec 10 18:03:41 [postfix/smtpd] connect from
99-206-220-166.pools.spcsdns.net[
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:17:09PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > The problem is that users other than the owner of the mailbox may
> > need to send mail... So you need either a setuid sendmail(1) or
> > a system like Postfix with multiple processes at different privilege
> > levels and IPC betw
> so what logs are these? I mean, how were these logs generated?
>
vixie-cron
> if you followed the "mentioned threads", then that mail should have been
> blocked. your sender_access should contain
>
> rptd.ch REJECT not authorized blah blah
>
> do not forget to postmap the file.
Roland Plüss a écrit :
>> so what logs are these? I mean, how were these logs generated?
>>
> vixie-cron
so they are not logs. these are reports.
next time, connect to your server and grab lines from /var/log/maillog
(or whatever file contains postfix logs). not necessary now.
>> if you foll
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:07:47PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
The DES-CBC3-SHA 168 bit cypher seems reasonably common (here,
nearly 10% of connections)
SSL with DES-CBC3-SHA is broken in pre-Vista version of Windows,
so if a Windows client is using the SSL support in Micr
> so they are not logs. these are reports.
>
> next time, connect to your server and grab lines from /var/log/maillog
> (or whatever file contains postfix logs). not necessary now.
>
I don't have such a file. All logs go into the one I posted managed by
vixie-cron.
> it really depends on your s
According to section 4.2.4 on the RFC 282, the SMTP server should return
502 only when a command is recognised but not implemented, and 500 if it
isn't recognised.
Whe I connect to my postfix server and enter some random commands (ie
knodwfonfwdnoi) I get a 502 error message instead of a 500. So I
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:25:11PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Victor Duchovni escribio:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Full log with strace is now in [1]postfix-strace.txt
References
Visi
Hello everybody,
In virtual_mailbox_maps I can define:
someu...@somelocaldomain.com somelocaldomain.com/someuser/
or, in virtual_alias_maps I can set:
someu...@somelocaldomain.com anotheracco...@someplaceelse.com
But how do I combine these so that mail received by
som
Nevermind... this was sufficiently answered in a recent discussion "Alias
and mailbox under one e-mail address".
Either this kind of questions repeat frequently enough, or it's an
interesting co-incidence that the same issues I'm tackling with are often
discussed on the list just around the same t
To continue on this issue... I was able to get the functionality I was
looking for by first creating an alias with multiple recipients on the local
domain, then using that alias in recipient_bcc_maps to send a copy of a
message delivered to a local mailbox to multiple external recipients (as
recipi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:02:34PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
> >Please send plain-text email, not HTML. Please post the requested logging
> >and PCAP file, using one of the real clients (not s_client) would be ideal.
> >
> Normal logging without -v parameter?
Yes, all the verbose l
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> To continue on this issue... I was able to get the functionality I was
> looking for by first creating an alias with multiple recipients on the local
> domain, then using that alias in recipient_bcc_maps to send a copy of a
> message delivered to a local mailbox to multip
Thanks, Sahil! That is certainly simpler and seems to work well.
Ville
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:59:41AM +0100, klondike wrote:
> According to section 4.2.4 on the RFC 282, the SMTP server should return
> 502 only when a command is recognised but not implemented, and 500 if it
> isn't recognised.
This is not a bug, but it is admittedly an unecessary deviation from
On 12/11/08 9:41 PM, Victor Duchovni at victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:59:41AM +0100, klondike wrote:
>
>> According to section 4.2.4 on the RFC 282, the SMTP server should return
>> 502 only when a command is recognised but not implemented, and 500 if it
>>
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:53:18PM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
> > This is not a bug, but it is admittedly an unecessary deviation from
> > SHOULD normative language in the RFC when the client is in flagrant
> > violation by sending garbage.
>
> At the risk of moving away from Postfix technical iss
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Larry Stone
> Sent: Friday, 12 December 2008 3:53 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix does not dot the i's when client sends gibberish
>
> On 12/11/08
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 04:44:08PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:07:47PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> >
> >>The DES-CBC3-SHA 168 bit cypher seems reasonably common (here,
> >>nearly 10% of connections)
> >
> >SSL with DES-CBC3-SHA is broken in pre-V
Roland Plüss a écrit :
>> so they are not logs. these are reports.
>>
>> next time, connect to your server and grab lines from /var/log/maillog
>> (or whatever file contains postfix logs). not necessary now.
>>
> I don't have such a file. All logs go into the one I posted managed by
> vixie-cron
89 matches
Mail list logo
