Michal Soltys wrote:
Luigi Rosa wrote:
Given a Linux server with three network cards:
eth0: 192.168.1.1 (local LAN)
eth1: 20.20.20.20 (default GW, hi speed Internet, dynamic address)
eth2: 30.30.30.30 (Internet, reserved to e-mail, static address)
This server is the default gateway
mouss said the following on 31/07/08 09:02:
so you also
need to play with "advanced" routing to make sure the packets go out of
eth2.
Such as?
I just need a hint on what I have to search in the documentation, either Postfix
or Linux. What do you mean with "advanced" routing?
Ciao,
luigi
Luigi Rosa wrote:
> mouss said the following on 31/07/08 09:02:
>
>> so you also need to play with "advanced" routing to make sure the
>> packets go out of eth2.
>
> Such as?
>
> I just need a hint on what I have to search in the documentation, either
> Postfix or Linux. What do you mean with "
Luigi Rosa wrote:
mouss said the following on 31/07/08 09:02:
so you also need to play with "advanced" routing to make sure the
packets go out of eth2.
Such as?
I just need a hint on what I have to search in the documentation, either
Postfix or Linux. What do you mean with "advanced" routi
The situation right now is:
Dspam is called by an smtpd restriction filter, like this in main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
#check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/vacation,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/dspam_learning,
permit_mynetworks,
permit_
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luigi Rosa wrote:
>
>> Given a Linux server with three network cards:
>>
>>eth0: 192.168.1.1 (local LAN)
>>eth1: 20.20.20.20 (default GW, hi speed Internet, dynamic address)
>>eth2: 30.30.30.30 (Internet, reser
Is it possible for me to configure postfix to forward/relay mail to another
host within the same domain without bouncing the mail with undeliverable
errors?
Regards,
Stephen
mouss escribió:
kyoku cocinillas wrote:
Hi, i am also interested in this feature, with the aliases i can
figure out where to route all the incoming email without having to
use the recipient_bcc_maps, but i cant find a workaround for the
sender_bcc_maps, i can only configure one email accoun
mouss escribió:
kyoku cocinillas wrote:
Hi, i am also interested in this feature, with the aliases i can
figure out where to route all the incoming email without having to
use the recipient_bcc_maps, but i cant find a workaround for the
sender_bcc_maps, i can only configure one email accoun
2008/7/29 Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Danny Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Im having some problem sending mail, i can receive mails but not send.
> >
> > The system is FreeBSD 6.3, im trying to make a mail server with virtual
> > domains, and from ports i have insta
Is there a way to make Postfix send a '550 Recipient address rejected' for
every mail to a certain address in a domain, and still have it pass the mail
on to the IMAP server?
I'm looking for a way to 'simulate' that the address does not exist,
although it does..
Anders
Hi
I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all emails to their
respective hosts for delivery.
For example
* RSCL Mumbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
> The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
>
> My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
>
> I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all emails t
RSCL Mumbai wrote:
Hi
I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all emails to their
respective hosts for d
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
RSCL Mumbai wrote:
Hi
I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all ema
I was speaking with someone about Postfix and they suggested I use
"virtual" mailboxes rather than system accounts for mailboxes. They
indicated there is no point in utilzing UID's for mailusers and system
accounts simply for Postfix however there appears to be hundreds /
thousands of available UID
Carlos Williams wrote, at 07/31/2008 09:48 AM:
I was speaking with someone about Postfix and they suggested I use
"virtual" mailboxes rather than system accounts for mailboxes. They
indicated there is no point in utilzing UID's for mailusers and system
accounts simply for Postfix however there ap
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * RSCL Mumbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
>> The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
>>
>> My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our
Hi everyone!
I have a linux box with three interfaces and I want to set postfix
outgoing interface to eth2
eth0 is conected to LAN
eth1 is using a public IP x.x.x.x
eth2 is usign a public IP y.y.y.y
I 'm using linux box to NAT, and firewall with iptables.
The routing tables are
# route -n
Kern
Gabriel Angel Möll Ibacache schrieb:
Hi everyone!
I have a linux box with three interfaces and I want to set postfix
outgoing interface to eth2
eth0 is conected to LAN
eth1 is using a public IP x.x.x.x
eth2 is usign a public IP y.y.y.y
I 'm using linux box to NAT, and firewall with iptables.
* RSCL Mumbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Use sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
> >
>
> I have done this:
>
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_dependent_relayhost
> smtp_sender_dependent_authentication = yes
>
> What should be the construction of "
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Is there a way to make Postfix send a '550 Recipient address rejected' for
every mail to a certain address in a domain, and still have it pass the mail
on to the IMAP server?
I'm looking for a way to 'simulate' that the address does not exist,
although it does..
Anders
2008/7/31 Robert Schetterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gabriel Angel Möll Ibacache schrieb:
>>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I have a linux box with three interfaces and I want to set postfix
>> outgoing interface to eth2
>>
>> eth0 is conected to LAN
>> eth1 is using a public IP x.x.x.x
>> eth2 is usign a pub
Mufit Eribol wrote:
Hi,
My postfix is set up to use SSL on port 465. It works fine except one
problem. My RAID software can not establish communication over TLS on
port 465. It can use port 25 (or any port without TLS).
The easiest solution might be to use stunnel to allow your
raid soft
Hi,
We just started rolling out 2.5.3. On starting up we see:
fatal: open lock file $data_directory/master.lock
This seems to be a result of (HISTORY):
20080220
Safety: the master daemon now sets an exclusive lock on a
file $data_directory/master.lock, so that the data directory
Unfortunately (for you), Postfix currently does not use supplementary
groups, anywhere. It's not a quick hack to change this.
Wietse
Dear All,
I am using postfix + perdition + courier + ldap+ maildir (mail quota) on my
mail servers.
All the functions are working fine on the server except one small issue on
my backend servers.
I configured mail quota on the mail servers, suppose if the user quota
becomes full
condition 1 (worki
Policyd seems to have interesting features and it uses MySQL. I'll try
it here. Thank you.
I'm a Sys admin working here with FreeBSD, but I'm a Java developer
too, so after I was noticed that postfix checks use a single variable
(client, helo, sender, recipient), that I would not be able to do wha
Gejo Paul wrote:
Dear All,
I am using postfix + perdition + courier + ldap+ maildir (mail quota)
on my mail servers.
All the functions are working fine on the server except one small
issue on my backend servers.
I configured mail quota on the mail servers, suppose if the user quota
becomes f
2008/7/31 Mufit Eribol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My postfix is set up to use SSL on port 465. It works fine except one
> problem. My RAID software can not establish communication over TLS on port
> 465. It can use port 25 (or any port without TLS).
Seeing as you've got the usual smtpd running on port
> Anders Norrbring wrote:
> > Is there a way to make Postfix send a '550 Recipient address
> rejected' for
> > every mail to a certain address in a domain, and still have it pass
> the mail
> > on to the IMAP server?
> > I'm looking for a way to 'simulate' that the address does not exist,
> > altho
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Is there a way to make Postfix send a '550 Recipient address
rejected' for
every mail to a certain address in a domain, and still have it pass
the mail
on to the IMAP server?
I'm looking for a way to 'simulate' that the address does not exist,
> Anders Norrbring wrote:
> >> Anders Norrbring wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to make Postfix send a '550 Recipient address
> >> rejected' for
> >>> every mail to a certain address in a domain, and still have it pass
> >> the mail
> >>> on to the IMAP server?
> >>> I'm looking for a way to 'simulate'
Hello, we are currently running and have been very happy with,
Postfix and a MySQL backend. Along with this we have Courier Pop3, SASL,
Amavis-new, various anti-virua/spam stuff, Mailman and PostfixAdmin.
This provides us with some very good functionality which we would like to
retain.
However, I
Jeff Thurston wrote:
Hello, we are currently running and have been very happy with,
Postfix and a MySQL backend. Along with this we have Courier Pop3, SASL,
Amavis-new, various anti-virua/spam stuff, Mailman and PostfixAdmin.
This provides us with some very good functionality which we would like
Does anyone know a way to set the message size restriction based on time
of day?
In the AM I have a large volume of outgoing traffic. If users send
large messages it exceeds the bandwith of the circuit.
The AM messages are time sensitive so max outgoing performance is critical.
In the PM the
* Jeffrey Shawn Klotz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone know a way to set the message size restriction based on time
> of day?
With a cronjob
0 0 * * * postconf -e "message_size_limit = big" && postfix reload
0 8 * * * postconf -e "message_size_limit = small" && postfix reload
--
Ralf Hil
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Does anyone know a way to set the message size restriction based on
time of day?
In the AM I have a large volume of outgoing traffic. If users send
large messages it exceeds the bandwith of the circuit.
The AM messages are time sensitive so max outgoing performance
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>Ronald F. Guilmette:
>>
>> I was just perusing the /var/log/messages file on a system I have
>> that's currently running Postfix 2.5.1 and I saw the following messages:
>>
>> Jul 29 19:47:42 roomy postfix/smtpd[72875]: gethostby*.getanswer: asked for
I am having email delays that are over two hours long. I can not figure this
out but `qshape` shows thousands of messages in the mail queue, but `mailq`
says the that /var/spool/mqueue is empty. I have rebooted several times and
flushed everything I can. Anymore ideas for me?
-- Tait
Tait Grove wrote:
I am having email delays that are over two hours long. I can not figure
this out but `qshape` shows thousands of messages in the mail queue, but
`mailq` says the that /var/spool/mqueue is empty. I have rebooted
several times and flushed everything I can. Anymore ideas for me?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never liked the idea of creating system users just for email, although I
> did it for years. Even with unusable login shells, home directories can get
> pretty untidy and challenging to back up for mail purposes (although M
Carlos Williams wrote, at 07/31/2008 08:18 PM:
So you controls this account creation operation?
If you don't "adduser bob" in Linux,
which application do you interface with to create a virtual mailbox?
Is this done in Postfix or Cyrus?
Adding a user takes two steps:
1. Create the user's mail
2008/8/1 Gabriel Angel Möll Ibacache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, I tryed to define smtp_bind_address=y.y.y.y but that didn't
> work, maybe because I had the same default router for both IP (x.x.x.x
> and y.y.y.y). Or maybe the nat rule in iptables is causing the
> redirection to x.x.x.x.
You need
On 8/1/08, Carlos Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I never liked the idea of creating system users just for email, although I
>> did it for years. Even with unusable login shells, home directories can
>> get
>> pretty u
Hallo postfix-users,
Occasionally external systems are tying to send mail with a
faked sender address via my system. So far no harm is done,
ad they have not been able to create a real user name. But
I would like to stop them before they use my mail system,
as soon as they make contact. How can I
>> Tait Grove wrote:
>> I am having email delays that are over two hours long. I can not figure
>> this out but `qshape` shows thousands of messages in the mail queue, but
>> `mailq` says the that /var/spool/mqueue is empty. I have rebooted
>> several times and flushed everything I can. Anymore
* Tait Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am having email delays that are over two hours long. I can not figure this
> out but `qshape` shows thousands of messages in the mail queue, but `mailq`
> says the that /var/spool/mqueue is empty. I have rebooted several times and
> flushed everything I can. A
48 matches
Mail list logo
