> Anders Norrbring wrote:
> >> Anders Norrbring wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to make Postfix send a '550 Recipient address
> >> rejected' for
> >>> every mail to a certain address in a domain, and still have it pass
> >> the mail
> >>> on to the IMAP server?
> >>> I'm looking for a way to 'simulate' that the address does not
> exist,
> >>> although it does..
> >>>
> >>> Anders
> >>>
> >> You need a smtpd_proxy_filter that responds with a 550 after
> >> end-of-data and keeps a copy.  For example, you can do this
> >> with amavisd-new by telling it to reject with quarantine.
> >>
> >> Note that responding with 550 at end-of-data affects all
> >> recipients of a multi-recipient message.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Noel Jones
> >
> >
> > Thanks Noel,
> > I'm just not sure about how to implement it.. I do use Amavis-New
> already
> > that I call from Postfix with 'content_filter = lmtp-amavis' in
> main.cf
> >
> > Would you happen to have a concrete example on how to use it for
> let's say
> > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' but not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ?
> Or
> > would it be possible to use only for a whole domain, and not some
> addresses?
> > In any case, it would be nice with an example!
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Anders.
> >
> >
> 
> Biggest change is you would need to use amavisd-new as a
> smtpd_proxy_filter rather than a post queue content_filter.
> Be aware that amavisd-new is not officially supported in this
> mode, but is reported by others to work fine.  Also note that
> smtpd_proxy_filter is not recommended for high-volume sites
> since the number of smtpd listeners you can run is limited to
> the number of amavisd-new children your hardware can support.
> 
> Then just blacklist that recipient, set amavisd-new to
> D_REJECT, and turn on quarantine.
> 
> I suggested amavisd-new as one example of how this could be
> done.  It's not necessarily the best way.
> 
> --
> Noel Jones


Oh, okay...
I have quite high volume, so I'm afraid that I can't take any chances by
changing the way it works for doing this. The server is handling a number of
other domains, so disturbing them with experimenting isn't really an
option...
Oh well, it's not a big deal anyway, but thanks for explaining! I'll look
into it on an experimental setup at some point!

Anders.


Reply via email to