Gino Ferguson via Postfix-users:
> Hi All,
>
> We are relaying emails to Microsoft SMTP servers with basic
> authentication but Microsoft is sunsetting this form of auth and
> they push everyone to oAuth.
>
> I'm curious what do you use for oAuth? I've found a github project
> and I'm about to giv
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 06:53:56PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> example.com relay:[inside-gateway.example.com]:port
>
> The port can be numeric (465, 587) or symbolic (smtps, submissions,
> submission).
With port 465 (a.k.a. "smtps"), don't forget to use a dedicated clon
Kenneth Porter via Postfix-users:
> How would I configure a firewall server to forward to an internal server
> over an authenticated submission connection? The examples I'm reading
> seem to show an unauthenticated connection to port 25. I expect I'd use
> a custom internal user for this.
>
> R
Norbert Schmidt via Postfix-users:
> Hello,
>
> We've got a single user needing Micro$oft Teams. This users mailaccount
> u...@contenso.com is configured on our server AND within Microsoft365 as
> sending address for the invitations.
> All other mail accounts are local and send via postfix.
> Wi
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:58:58PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> I have a postfix-3.5.10 server on fedora35 and would like to
> experiment with relaying outbound mail from my Microsoft 365 test
> server through my postfix server to the recipient's final destination
> using certificates as a way to authenti
I think you're right, i will redirect using smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
thanks guys :)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:41 PM Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/26/2020 10:13 AM, Martin Terp Jensen wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I have some postfix servers running as a relay/gateway for internal
> > mails, when t
On 6/26/2020 10:13 AM, Martin Terp Jensen wrote:
Hi guys.
I have some postfix servers running as a relay/gateway for internal
mails, when they want to go to the world wide web.
These internal servers i trust, but sometimes mails from CRON gets
send to me, i know, the best solution would be t
On 26 Jun 2020, at 09:13, Martin Terp Jensen wrote:
> These internal servers i trust, but sometimes mails from CRON gets send to
> me, i know, the best solution would be to disable cron mails
Uh… since cron send mails when action result in errors this seems like a bad
idea.
> So, for now i wan
Simon ELBAZ:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks a lot for this solution.
> How could i adapt it for relay_domains ?
>
> In my case, example.com is a listed in relay_domains.
No adaptation is needed.
Wietse
sel...@linagora.com:
> Sorry for the lack of provided info.
>
> A customer wants to evaluate a new SMTP server alongside the existing
> one for a period of time.
>
> They want to be able to have the choice at one moment to be able to
> switch from the legacy SMTP server to the new one.
This i
Sorry for the lack of provided info.
A customer wants to evaluate a new SMTP server alongside the existing
one for a period of time.
They want to be able to have the choice at one moment to be able to
switch from the legacy SMTP server to the new one.
For incoming mail, I want to achieve thi
What actual benefit are you trying to get from doing this?
In what way do the 2 different servers differ in their behaviour?
A little less cryptic description might actually get you some good
information.
Ron
On 4/17/19 10:56 AM, sel...@linagora.com wrote:
I want to forward an incoming mai
n: sel...@linagora.com
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Simon ELBAZ
> Verzonden: woensdag 17 april 2019 16:36
> Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Onderwerp: Re: Relaying to 2 SMTP servers
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Sorry, I wanted to say using Postfix.
I want to forward an incoming mail to 2 SMTP servers using the same mail
domain.
Each server will then deliver the mail to its IMAP storage.
Regards
Simon
On 2019-04-17 16:50, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 4/17/19 10:36 AM, Simon ELBAZ wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Sorry, I wan
On 4/17/19 10:36 AM, Simon ELBAZ wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Sorry, I wanted to say using Postfix.
>
> I look for different open source solutions to achieve this.
OK. Perhaps if you could give us a little more detail on exactly what
you are trying to accomplish?
--
Phil Stracchino
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry, I wanted to say using Postfix.
I look for different open source solutions to achieve this.
Regards
Simon
On 17/04/2019 16:33, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 4/17/19 10:03 AM, sel...@linagora.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to deliver a mail to
On 4/17/19 10:03 AM, sel...@linagora.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if it is possible to deliver a mail to 2 SMTP
> servers using OpenSMTPD.
Perhaps that's a question you should ask on the OpenSMTPD mailing list.
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
On 04.12.18 10:10, pete pot wrote:
Currently my Postfix is realying emails from domains listed in $relay_domains
are you aware that relay_domains is list of domains that postfix will
receive mail TO, not send from? The point is to be MX server for those
domains.
Is it possible with postfix to
pete pot:
> Hi,
> Currently my Postfix is realying emails from domains listed in
> $relay_domains only when those emails come from IPs listed in
> $mynetworks.
Postfix does not give relay permission based on the "mail from"
address.
Instead, Postfix is usually configured to give relay permission
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 05:25:15PM -0400, Fongaboo wrote:
>
> Running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE. I am migrating a
> listserv on an older box to this one, running newly-installed
> Mailman 2.1.20.
>
> I found a one-pager that showed me what to tar up and move over to
The tarball, doe
On Tue, November 19, 2013 1:34 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:22:12PM +1100, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
..
> This is correct, provided the domain is removed from any other
> address class.
..
> Provided this is postmapped and matches the actual domain.
..
> As expected.
..
> V
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:22:12PM +1100, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> I've tried adding to /etc/main.cf like:
>
> relay_domains = dom.org.au
> transport_maps = hash:$config_directory/transport
This is correct, provided the domain is removed from any other
address class.
> and /etc/transport
>
>
Kevin,
On 02/14/2013 09:41 PM, Kevin Blackwell wrote:
> I have 2 mx records. The primary is Exchanges edge server that has it's
> own internal spam filtering. The secondary is poxtfix server relaying
> mail to the edge server as a backup mx record. Are you saying the
> postfix server should be beh
Am 15.02.2013 01:30, schrieb Simon Walter:
> On 02/15/2013 06:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> no need for two MX records at all
>
> I think perhaps that is a bit of hasty advice. I'm quite sure given a large
> enough infrastructure and traffic load
> that you'd want two or more MX records wit
* Kevin Blackwell :
> I have 2 mx records. The primary is Exchanges edge server that has it's own
> internal spam filtering. The secondary is poxtfix server relaying mail to
> the edge server as a backup mx record. Are you saying the postfix server
> should be behind the Exchange edge server?
Wron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Blackwell said the following on 14/02/2013 20:31:
> I'm using postfix to relay email to our exchange server.
>
> The problem I'm running into is the spam filtering on the exchange filter
> is being bypassed because the relayed email shows a fro
On 02/15/2013 06:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
no need for two MX records at all
I think perhaps that is a bit of hasty advice. I'm quite sure given a
large enough infrastructure and traffic load that you'd want two or more
MX records with a different SMTP server sitting behind each IP address
DO NOT TOP POST IF YOU GOT A REPLY BELOW YOUR MESSAGE
ON MAILING-LISTS, SEE MY REPLY AT BOTTOM WHILE I REFUSE
TO REPAIR THE THRAED BECAUSE NOBODY WOULD PAY THE WORK
Am 14.02.2013 21:41, schrieb Kevin Blackwell:
> I have 2 mx records. The primary is Exchanges edge server that has it's own
> intern
I have 2 mx records. The primary is Exchanges edge server that has it's own
internal spam filtering. The secondary is poxtfix server relaying mail to
the edge server as a backup mx record. Are you saying the postfix server
should be behind the Exchange edge server?
Kevin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1
Am 14.02.2013 20:31, schrieb Kevin Blackwell:
> I'm using postfix to relay email to our exchange server.
>
> The problem I'm running into is the spam filtering on the exchange filter is
> being bypassed because the relayed
> email shows a from address of the email relay server and not the orig
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
In my experience, public facing email domains for organizations
with complex email requirements are almost almost best implemented
as virtual alias domains. This adds a layer of indirection between
the outside view of an email domain (everyone is just
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:31:29PM +0200, Geoff Shang wrote:
> Right now, the company itself is using a particular domain for its
> Email, lets call it example.com. But, in a classic case of not
> thinking far enough ahead, it's been decided that the example.com
> domain will now be used for our
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeroen Geilman"
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Sunday, 17 June, 2012 11:15:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail
> probably)
>
> Use the content_filter to directly relay to
On 06/17/2012 08:38 AM, Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To: "Wiebe Cazemier"
Cc: "Postfix users"
Sent: Sunday, 17 June, 2012 2:41:29 AM
Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail probably)
Wiebe
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Wiebe Cazemier"
> Cc: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Sunday, 17 June, 2012 2:41:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail
> probably)
>
> Wie
Wiebe Cazemier:
> > Transport maps can be per-recipient.
>
> But when I want to relay to another server, I don't want to send
> it to one recipient. I want to send it to whatever recipient the
> original message was sent to, but to another server.
transport_maps changes the relay HOST, but NOT th
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Saturday, 16 June, 2012 3:50:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail
> probably)
>
> Transport maps can be per-recipient.
But
Wiebe Cazemier:
> Hi,
>
> In a bash script, I have:
>
> - an e-mail message with full headers in a tmp file.
> - A from address (to use for -f with 'sendmail')
> - a recipient (u...@example.com).
>
> How do I relay this message to another server than example.com,
> but do set RCPT TO to u...@e
Thanks rob0,
Thanks for your reply.
I will try route sendmail to postfix, successful will update.
Regards,
Ramesh
From: /dev/rob0
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: relaying
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:08:05PM
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:08:05PM +0800, Ramesh wrote:
> Is it possible to force sendmail on a remote host to relay
> all messages through server running postfix.
>
> currently email are sent through postini because domainX MX
> record points to postini, I want sendmail on domainX to send
> direc
Hi All,
I am sorry for posting without subject.
Regards,
Ramesh
From: Ramesh
To: Postfix users
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012 11:35 AM
Subject:
Hi All,
Is it possible to force sendmail on a remote host to relay all messages through
server running post
Wietse Venema:
> Alex:
> > Hi,
> >
> > >> We have set up an application using the amazon cloud service, and
> > >> having a problem with relaying. How do I properly authorize the amazon
> > >> servers to relay mail through our server?
> > >>
> > >> Aug 11 17:06:39 portal postfix/smtpd[13792]: NOQU
Alex:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi,
>
> >> We have set up an application using the amazon cloud service, and
> >> having a problem with relaying. How do I properly authorize the amazon
> >> servers to relay mail through our server?
> >>
> >> Aug 11 17:06:39 portal postfix
Hi,
>> We have set up an application using the amazon cloud service, and
>> having a problem with relaying. How do I properly authorize the amazon
>> servers to relay mail through our server?
>>
>> Aug 11 17:06:39 portal postfix/smtpd[13792]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from ec2-184-72-46-254.us-west
Alex:
> Hi,
>
> We have set up an application using the amazon cloud service, and
> having a problem with relaying. How do I properly authorize the amazon
> servers to relay mail through our server?
>
> Aug 11 17:06:39 portal postfix/smtpd[13792]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from ec2-184-72-46-254.us
On 5/6/2011 2:48 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Hello all,
I have tinkered with getting Postfix to relay mail from an external
(to the Exchange subnet) server to an Exchange 2010 server. I have not
done any real tests yet, as this mail is all our organization mail and
I want to get it right. Als
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 09:36 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am attempting to get Postfix working as a relay to an Exchange 2010
>> server in the same subnet. The incoming mail may originate from the
>> same subnet, but it all goes t
Thank you all for your most helpful tips. I will spend some time with
this information and see what I come
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 09:36 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am attempting to get Postfix working as a relay to an Exchange 2
On 05/04/2011 09:36 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to get Postfix working as a relay to an Exchange 2010
server in the same subnet. The incoming mail may originate from the
same subnet, but it all goes through a central server that is outside
the subnet. I am doing this for
On 5/4/2011 2:36 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to get Postfix working as a relay to an Exchange 2010
server in the same subnet. The incoming mail may originate from the
same subnet, but it all goes through a central server that is outside
the subnet. I am doing this for tro
Daniel Bromberg:
> Just to source it:
>
>[snapshot-2507] For the sake of Sendmail compatibility, the
>Postfix SMTP client skips over SMTP servers that greet with a 4XX
>or 5XX reply code, treating them as unreachable servers. To obtain
>prior behavior (4XX=retry, 5XX=bounce), s
On 4/8/2011 2:45 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jean-Sébastien Kroll-Rabotin:
Hi,
When my Postfix server sends some mail from addresses in the local
domain, permanent errors (5XX) are treated as temporary errors (4XX)
and mail is delayed while it should definitely fail.
From your logs I cannot
* Jean-Sébastien Kroll-Rabotin :
>
> Hi,
>
> When my Postfix server sends some mail from addresses in the local
> domain, permanent errors (5XX) are treated as temporary errors (4XX)
> and mail is delayed while it should definitely fail.
>From your logs I cannot see WHEN (at which stage of the S
Zitat von Ben McGinnes :
On 5/11/10 4:31 PM, mouss wrote:
hmmm. here:
$ host 74.125.45.27
27.45.125.74.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer yx-in-f27.1e100.net.
$ host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com has address 209.85.227.27
74.125.45.27 is a google IP, but I don't see it
On 5/11/10 4:31 PM, mouss wrote:
>
> hmmm. here:
> $ host 74.125.45.27
> 27.45.125.74.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer yx-in-f27.1e100.net.
> $ host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com has address 209.85.227.27
>
> 74.125.45.27 is a google IP, but I don't see it listed as the
Zitat von mouss :
Le 05/11/2010 05:54, Pablo Chamorro a écrit :
Today we had a 'relaying denied' issue between 15:08-17:02 p.m.
Here it is the output of pflogsumm:
Per-Hour Traffic Summary
time received delivered deferredbounced rejected
-
Le 05/11/2010 05:54, Pablo Chamorro a écrit :
Today we had a 'relaying denied' issue between 15:08-17:02 p.m. Here it is the
output of pflogsumm:
Per-Hour Traffic Summary
time received delivered deferredbounced rejected
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 17:47:21, John A. a écrit :
> Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 14:12:22, John A. a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
> > >
> > > John A. articulated:
> > > > I tried to use transport as following:
> > > >
> > > > transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
> > > > - local
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 14:12:22, John A. a écrit :
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
> >
> > John A. articulated:
> > > I tried to use transport as following:
> > >
> > > transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
> > > - local.cf contains a sql query which returns "virtual" if the
> > > "u...@d
--
***
Jonathan Amiez
Administrateur système
j...@edatis.com
it-pa...@edatis.com
ad...@edatis.com
***
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 13:15:36, Jerry a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
>
> John A. articulated:
> > I tried to use transport as f
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
John A. articulated:
> I tried to use transport as following:
>
> transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
> - local.cf contains a sql query which returns "virtual" if the "u...@domain"
> matches.
> - remote.cf contains a sql query which return "smtp:[mail.gateway
I tried to use transport as following:
transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
- local.cf contains a sql query which returns "virtual" if the "u...@domain"
matches.
- remote.cf contains a sql query which return "smtp:[mail.gateway]" if the
domain matches.
Did this according to TABLE SEARCH ORDER se
Le lundi 12 juillet 2010 19:10:38, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> On 07/12/2010 04:41 PM, John A. wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm trying to setup a multi-server mail architecture with a mail gateway
> > and 2 final dest. servers hosting mailboxes, all on the same domain.
> > I'm using virtual mailboxes wi
On 07/12/2010 04:41 PM, John A. wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to setup a multi-server mail architecture with a mail gateway and 2
final dest. servers hosting mailboxes, all on the same domain.
I'm using virtual mailboxes wih MySQL backend (same for the 3 servers).
I set up the gateway which forwards to
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
> Hi!
>
> This is getting interesting. How, exactly, does mailman (or other
> mailing list manager) handles this? I mean, I have seen several
> SPF-enabled domains, and these domains have subscriptions to one or
> more lists... now, reading the headers for one of
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> So... my guess is that the SPF check will go against this mail
> address, not the one on the From field. am I right?
SPF is against the ENVELOPE, not the HEADER.
--
Sahil Tandon
Hi!
This is getting interesting. How, exactly, does mailman (or other
mailing list manager) handles this? I mean, I have seen several
SPF-enabled domains, and these domains have subscriptions to one or
more lists... now, reading the headers for one of the messages of this
lists, I got this:
S
ram:
>
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 12:14 +, Simon Waters wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 April 2010 12:38:29 J.R.Ewing wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any solution?
> > > I have idea to move senders address to "reply to" field and write new
> > > sender. Is it possible with postfix?
Postfix supports DKIM,
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 12:14 +, Simon Waters wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010 12:38:29 J.R.Ewing wrote:
> >
> > Is there any solution?
> > I have idea to move senders address to "reply to" field and write new
> > sender. Is it possible with postfix?
>
> As Ralph says SRS will do this.
>
>
Simon Waters napsal(a):
On Thursday 01 April 2010 12:38:29 J.R.Ewing wrote:
Is there any solution?
I have idea to move senders address to "reply to" field and write new
sender. Is it possible with postfix?
As Ralph says SRS will do this.
However I looked at this recently for a project, where
On Thursday 01 April 2010 12:38:29 J.R.Ewing wrote:
>
> Is there any solution?
> I have idea to move senders address to "reply to" field and write new
> sender. Is it possible with postfix?
As Ralph says SRS will do this.
However I looked at this recently for a project, where I thought I'd need
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Yes, SRS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Rewriting_Scheme
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450
* J.R.Ewing :
> Hello people,
>
> Iam trying to solv a problem with relaying. I want to setup a
> distribution list for one domain, where will postfix only relay email
> for mydomain.com to selected users email addresses. No local
> mailboxes, only realaying list. Its quite simple, but.. but if I
Randy wrote:
It appears that exchange uses some other criteria to
check sender domain or that it does additional checks and simply
rejects with that message. I do realize that I could set up something
where we accept the mail to these domains, scan it then drop the email
if it is tagged as sp
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Randy put forth on 3/24/2010 3:55 PM:
dig -x 208.43.143.111
;; ANSWER SECTION:
111.143.43.208.in-addr.arpa. 3600 INPTR
208.43.143.111-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
Your problem isn't the Exchange server per se. Your problem is that you're
forwarding spam
Randy put forth on 3/24/2010 3:55 PM:
> dig -x 208.43.143.111
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 111.143.43.208.in-addr.arpa. 3600 INPTR
> 208.43.143.111-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
Your problem isn't the Exchange server per se. Your problem is that you're
forwarding spam to it, and its anti-spam
duyz
仍然们
ent from my HTC
-Original Message噢
From: Wietse Venema 万维网
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 6:29 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Relaying and backskatter problem
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> > EX:
> > : Sender address rejected: Domai
Wietse Venema wrote:
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
EX:
: Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that'
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> > EX:
> > : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> > reply to RCPT TO command))
>
> I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
> would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where it's destine
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> EX:
> : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where it's destined)
and see if that server will acc
Patric Falinder skrev 2010-03-17 14:36:
Brian Evans - Postfix List skrev 2010-03-17 13:43:
On 3/17/2010 6:05 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
sure how sasl work
Brian Evans - Postfix List skrev 2010-03-17 13:43:
On 3/17/2010 6:05 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
sure how sasl works..
I attached my main.cf to this mail. I
On 3/17/2010 6:05 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
> Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
> starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
> sure how sasl works..
> I attached my main.cf to this mail. I have read the Postfix SASL
> Readme but I'm s
Hello,
I think the server does not offer TLS authentication to you at all (only
PLAIN and LOGIN authentication which you could probably use, if you have
valid credentials).
You should really contact the administrator of the server and clarify
things up - how are you supposed to authenticate
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
sure how sasl works..
I attached my main.cf to this mail. I have read the Postfix SASL Readme
but I'm still not sure about how it works or if my config is
Hi,
> At any rate, you miss the point.
> The smtpd_{client, helo, sender, recipient}_restrictions are about *when* a
> check takes place, corresponding to the {client connection, HELO, MAIL FROM,
> RCPT TO} stage of the SMTP transaction.
It works now, thanks so much.
I understand much more clear
On 11/13/2009 10:57 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
maps_rbl_domains =
zen.spamhaus.org
cbl.abuseat.org
sbl.spamhaus.org
pbl.spamhaus.org
zen.spamhaus.org already includes both sbl.spamhaus.org and
pbl.spamhaus.org.
Oops, zen also includes cbl.abuseat.org. So you're doing 1
lookup for the price of 4.
On 11/12/2009 10:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
If you don't want to whitelist the IP address completely but instead just
want to allow it to bypass your HELO checks, then check_helo_access will
work. However, you should first understand that the type of lookup performed
depends on the name of the rest
On 12-Nov-2009, at 21:09, Alex wrote:
> But helo is a component of the envelope, no?
No.
--
<[TN]FBMachine> i got kicked out of Barnes and Noble once for
moving all the bibles into the fiction section
Hi,
> If you don't want to whitelist the IP address completely but instead just
> want to allow it to bypass your HELO checks, then check_helo_access will
> work. However, you should first understand that the type of lookup performed
> depends on the name of the restriction, NOT where the restrict
On 11/12/2009 9:21 PM, Alex wrote:
It looks as if you're trying to whitelist the client by IP, so you need
check_client_access to check an IP.
Yes, and I've tried that too. I have done quite a bit of reading, and
afraid I'm getting conflicting info now. I've read posts from Ralf in
the past, as
Hi,
> Stop top posting. Google for the term if you don't understand.
Sorry, that was only to follow up with my own post, so people had a reference.
> It looks as if you're trying to whitelist the client by IP, so you need
> check_client_access to check an IP.
Yes, and I've tried that too. I ha
Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/12/2009 1:48 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm still working on the problem you have all been so kind in helping
me with, and have a problem relating to helo_checks. We require a
proper FQDN for the helo, but would like to make an exception for
several IP addresses.
I've ad
On 11/12/2009 1:48 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm still working on the problem you have all been so kind in helping
me with, and have a problem relating to helo_checks. We require a
proper FQDN for the helo, but would like to make an exception for
several IP addresses.
I've added check_helo_acce
Alex wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm still working on the problem you have all been so kind in helping
me with, and have a problem relating to helo_checks. We require a
proper FQDN for the helo, but would like to make an exception for
several IP addresses.
I've added check_helo_access as the first line of
Hi,
To follow up with my own post, I should mention that I did postmap the
file, which I should have mentioned.
I also thought it might be better to add it to smtpd_client_restrictions?
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_checks
Perhaps that's the way to
Hi folks,
I'm still working on the problem you have all been so kind in helping
me with, and have a problem relating to helo_checks. We require a
proper FQDN for the helo, but would like to make an exception for
several IP addresses.
I've added check_helo_access as the first line of my
smtpd_reci
On 11/11/2009 11:36 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
But commas do make it prettier to look at.
My reality has been shaken, and everything I previously thought I knew drawn
into question.
Yeah, crazy. I always had the smtpd_recipient_restrictions separated
by a comma, all on one line, until recently whe
Hi,
>> But commas do make it prettier to look at.
>
> My reality has been shaken, and everything I previously thought I knew drawn
> into question.
Yeah, crazy. I always had the smtpd_recipient_restrictions separated
by a comma, all on one line, until recently when I saw so many others
using it o
Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/11/2009 10:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I'm guessing even v1.x required commas between restrictions?
Nope, a comma between restrictions is not now and has never been a
requirement.
Comma, space, LF+space are all considered equal. Mix and match to your
heart's desir
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo