Am 15.02.2013 01:30, schrieb Simon Walter: > On 02/15/2013 06:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> no need for two MX records at all > > I think perhaps that is a bit of hasty advice. I'm quite sure given a large > enough infrastructure and traffic load > that you'd want two or more MX records with a different SMTP server sitting > behind each IP address. I could (and > have been) wrong though.
in this case the setup sould be done by people which are knowing what they are doing and you have unlikely a exchange as MX having two MX and only one of them filters spam is dumb the two MX must behave identical from outside
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
