10] ([127.0.0.1] helo=[192.168.1.10]) by
ASSP-nospam; 25 Sep 2008 11:30:43 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: James Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Postfix users
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: [OFF]: D
James Brown wrote:
On 26/09/2008, at 1:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
James Brown:
Examining the headers of the email I sent to this list:
1. Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([127.0.0.1]
helo=[192.168.1.10]) by
...
3. Received: from mail.bordo.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(mail.bor
On 26/09/2008, at 1:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
James Brown:
Examining the headers of the email I sent to this list:
1. Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([127.0.0.1] helo=[192.168.1.10])
by
...
3. Received:from mail.bordo.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(mail.bordo.com.au [127.0.0.1])
James Brown:
> On 25/09/2008, at 11:03 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> >> I'll have to work out how to turn off going through amavisd-new next.
> >
> > amavisd-new is DKIM-clean, it will not break a signature.
> > Something else is modifying your Mime-Version header field.
> >
> > Mar
James Brown wrote:
[snip]
The Astaro box is doing S/MIME signing and encrypting, but I got the
same DKIM failure with it turned off.
when you test, make sure "turning off" really mean "it does not pass
through". and prove it (in short, look for a proff that it is so. don't
trust your interpr
On 25/09/2008, at 11:03 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
James,
I'll have to work out how to turn off going through amavisd-new next.
amavisd-new is DKIM-clean, it will not break a signature.
Something else is modifying your Mime-Version header field.
Mark
Yes, I thought it must be DKIM-clean, b
James,
> I'll have to work out how to turn off going through amavisd-new next.
amavisd-new is DKIM-clean, it will not break a signature.
Something else is modifying your Mime-Version header field.
Mark
James,
> I'm sending this reply using Thunderbird rather than Mail.app to see how
> the headers differ.
>
> I've tried sending without going through the ASSP anti-spam proxy to no
> avail. Likewise using amavisd-new.
Yes, this one is a PASS!
It still has two MIME-Version header fields, but unlik
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, James Brown wrote:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> James Brown schrieb:
>> Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
>> them an email directly?
>>
>> That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
>> giving false results somehow.
>
James Brown schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
James Brown schrieb:
Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
them an email directly?
That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
giving false results somehow.
Thanks,
James.
have you allready
Robert Schetterer wrote:
James Brown schrieb:
Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
them an email directly?
That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
giving false results somehow.
Thanks,
James.
have you allready tried Sender Auth Test
James Brown schrieb:
Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send them
an email directly?
That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's giving
false results somehow.
Thanks,
James.
have you allready tried Sender Auth Test Service [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25/09/2008, at 12:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
James Brown:
The flow of my email is:
Mail.app -> ASSP -> Postfix -> amavisd-new -> Postfix -> Astarto
Gateway -> Internet
I think :-)
Your mail is modified AFTER the DKIM signature is computed. Therefore,
the source of the message not break
On Thursday September 25 2008 02:06:41 James Brown wrote:
> Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
> them an email directly?
>
> That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
> giving false results somehow.
I wouldn't mind, although the postfix-user
Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
them an email directly?
That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
giving false results somehow.
Thanks,
James.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 25/09/2008, at 12:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
James Brown:
The flow of my email is:
Mail.app -> ASSP -> Postfix -> amavisd-new -> Postfix -> Astaro
Gateway -> Internet
I think :-)
Your mail is modified AFTER the DKIM signature is computed. Therefore,
the source of the message not breaki
James Brown:
> The flow of my email is:
>
> Mail.app -> ASSP -> Postfix -> amavisd-new -> Postfix -> Astarto
> Gateway -> Internet
>
> I think :-)
Your mail is modified AFTER the DKIM signature is computed. Therefore,
the source of the message not breaking the signature.
However, you can use
ubject: Re: [OFF]: DKIM broken by certain email clients
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:42:40 +1000
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1;
boundary="3
ubject: Re: [OFF]: DKIM broken by certain email clients
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:42:40 +1000
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-
signature"; micalg=sha1;
boundary="3
Pv7Qj+Cq5EOcwr75ZXv/GV+MRpo+qGiOfv0
fJtqDvR1TwbjuvSuRTHgQVCc1+AY3T4iDEQ5f4EGJ0NPR56rPqrKGDi1AwCGjvVD
sieq86AnRWfredZLTHzXvzq5neSGOE=
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: James Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sub
On 24/09/2008, at 1:54 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, September 24, 2008 03:05, James Brown wrote:
I've just set up DKIM on my mail system (via Astaro Security Gateway).
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
Thanks Benny. I'll send my reply using Thund
On 24/09/2008, at 12:00 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:05:21AM +1000, James Brown wrote:
I've just set up DKIM on my mail system (via Astaro Security
Gateway).
If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to comes back
saying:
DKIM check details:
Result: fail (signature d
On Wed, September 24, 2008 03:05, James Brown wrote:
> I've just set up DKIM on my mail system (via Astaro Security Gateway).
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
> If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to comes back
> saying:
>
> DKIM check details:
> Resu
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:05:21AM +1000, James Brown wrote:
> I've just set up DKIM on my mail system (via Astaro Security Gateway).
>
> If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to comes back
> saying:
>
> DKIM check details:
> Result: fail (signature doesn't verify)
>
> The same thing happen
24 matches
Mail list logo
