James Brown schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
James Brown schrieb:
Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
them an email directly?
That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
giving false results somehow.
Thanks,
James.
have you allready tried Sender Auth Test Service [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Yes thanks Robert, Wietse suggested it to me. It gives the same result:
Authentication System: DomainKeys Identified Mail
Result: DKIM signature confirmed BAD
Description: Signature verification failed, message may
have been tampered with or corrupted
Reporting host: sendmail.net
I'm sending this reply using Thunderbird rather than Mail.app to see how
the headers differ.
I've tried sending without going through the ASSP anti-spam proxy to no
avail. Likewise using amavisd-new.
Thanks,
James.
just for info , all these services
are very slow for dns changes
so if you change your key you might have to wait
one day using them again
i dont know lot of ASSP but why are you using it
if you have amavis ( which has features you need ), as well as the
antivirgateway
i see no need to use it.
if dkim gets broken after leaving amavis my bet
goes to the anitvirgate, i had many problems
with commercial antivirgateways in the past
they like deep inspection
and break headers often
maybe you can use transport on the amavis server
to bypass ASSP and Antivirserver for testing
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
