James Brown:
> On 25/09/2008, at 11:03 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> >> I'll have to work out how to turn off going through amavisd-new next.
> >
> > amavisd-new is DKIM-clean, it will not break a signature.
> > Something else is modifying your Mime-Version header field.
> >
> > Mark
>
> Yes, I thought it must be DKIM-clean, but took it out of the traffic
> flow and I still had problems. I did the same with ASSP. So that
> leaves either a faulty setup or bug in: the mail client, Postfix or
> Astaro. Given how robust Postfix I doubt if there is a bug there. But
> something being misconfigured by me is highly likely.
>
> Examining the headers of the email I sent to this list:
> 1. Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([127.0.0.1] helo=[192.168.1.10]) by
...
> 3. Received: from mail.bordo.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
> (mail.bordo.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
> id pW2vMuVVzAvF for <postfix-users@postfix.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 2008
> 11:30:44 +1000 (EST)
...
> 8. Received: from mail.bordo.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
> (mail.bordo.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
> id pW2vMuVVzAvF for <postfix-users@postfix.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 2008
> 11:30:44 +1000 (EST)
Are you sure that the exact same header is logged twice, with
four other Received: headers in-between?
Wietse
