Dnia 13.05.2020 o godz. 07:54:34 Tobi pisze:
> My 5 cents: never rely on the reputation of a domain if you do not have
> control over parent domain. So if others from eu.org zone sending spam
> one should not wonder why the own subdomain of eu.org might be
> listed/blocked/seen as spam.
That's exa
Zitat von "@lbutlr" :
On 11 May 2020, at 04:24, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Someone told me… that Google is more likely to classify email from
small senders as spam if they are sent via IPv6, and less likely if
they are sent via IPv4.
Short of Google publishing this information, I doubt that a
Hi
Am 12.05.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa:
> If
> somedomain.com sends spam, you won't automatically classify all other .com
> domains as spam. So why do it for eu.org?
because .com is a real TLD whereas eu.org is a pseudo TLD. You won't see
user@com in mail but u...@eu.org
My 5 cents: never
> What is a valid rDNS? How is it set?
when you open an address in your browser a (forward) dns lookup
will be initiated to get the server's ip address.
A reverse lookup (rDNS) is the opposite. You query an ip address
and get a fully qualified domainname back.
Mailservers must have a matching
On Tue, 12 May 2020 08:14:21 -0600 "@lbutlr" wrote:
> On 11 May 2020, at 04:24, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > Someone told me… that Google is more likely to classify email from small
> > senders as spam if they are sent via IPv6, and less likely if they are sent
> > via IPv4.
>
> Short of Google pu
On 11 May 2020, at 04:24, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Someone told me… that Google is more likely to classify email from small
> senders as spam if they are sent via IPv6, and less likely if they are sent
> via IPv4.
Short of Google publishing this information, I doubt that anyone knows this,
and s
Dnia 11.05.2020 o godz. 15:36:47 Curtis Villamizar pisze:
>
> I've had no problem with google dropping my email as spam in years.
> AOL and MSN (and friends, live, outlook, hotmail) sometimes, but
> resolved. Helps to have rDNS on your IPv6 and SPF and DKIM signed and
> all other things in place.
In message
"michae...@rocketmail.com" writes:
> THANKS to a all who answered!!!
>
> A lot of shared experience, learned a lot, cool. It's always very
> interesting how threads are meandering, somehow, adding new aspects to
> unasked but also relevant questions. Crowd as it's best :-) Summarize
michae...@rocketmail.com:
I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
records in the DNS, no A / ipv4 anymore?
In theory,
THANKS to a all who answered!!!
A lot of shared experience, learned a lot, cool. It's always very interesting
how threads are meandering, somehow, adding new aspects to unasked but also
relevant questions. Crowd as it's best :-)
Summarized your valuable hints, I'll stay with my Postfix configur
Dnia 8.05.2020 o godz. 23:26:06 Ralph Seichter pisze:
> Google has so far not rejected mail sent by the dual stack servers I
> maintain, no matter if IPv4 or IPv6 was used. Both DKIM and SPF are
> configured on my end, which seems to be a major concern for Google, but
> beyond that I have neither
Dnia 8.05.2020 o godz. 14:33:16 Bill Cole pisze:
>
> Some have IPv6 connectivity and address space but no motivation to
> make their mail systems use IPv6. There are reasons to avoid sending
> over IPv6 and very few if any significant reasons to want to send or
> receive over IPv6. If one has a w
On 08/05/2020 21:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Bob Proulx:
>> How are working and available IPv6 DNSBLs progressing? That's a
>> critical component which I would love to hear is no longer a missing
>> component.
>
> zen.spamhaus.org blocks some 15% of IPv6 spam for me. The other 85%
> comes from
* Bill Cole:
>> That's quite a sweeping statement, and I don't believe it to be true.
>
> Calling someone a liar is a very effective way to end a conversation.
Don't know if Trump supporter or trolling... I am a scientist, and thus
do not consider your claim to be true until you prove it. I have
On 8 May 2020, at 17:26, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Bill Cole:
>
>> The boutique hosting/connectivity/services provider I work with [...]
>> can provide native IPv6 to customers. None ever has ever asked for it.
>
> That's quite a sweeping statement, and I don't believe it to be true.
Calling some
In message <2eb09baa-5327-b615-47a9-0c1402385...@rocketmail.com>
"michae...@rocketmail.com" writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
> here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
> only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp
* Bill Cole:
> The boutique hosting/connectivity/services provider I work with [...]
> can provide native IPv6 to customers. None ever has ever asked for it.
That's quite a sweeping statement, and I don't believe it to be true.
For years I have asked every provider I have worked with if they offe
Bob Proulx:
> How are working and available IPv6 DNSBLs progressing? That's a
> critical component which I would love to hear is no longer a missing
> component.
zen.spamhaus.org blocks some 15% of IPv6 spam for me. The other 85%
comes from large providers (outlook.com, gmail.com, etc) that aren'
On 8 May 2020, at 15:06, Ralph Seichter wrote:
* Bill Cole:
Some have IPv6 connectivity and address space but no motivation to
make their mail systems use IPv6.
A case of what we call Public Servant Mikado (whoever moves first has
lost). ;-)
Yes.
Seriously, I think that if one can suppor
Bill Cole wrote:
> michaelof wrote:
> > I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
> > here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
> > only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
> > records in the DNS, no A / ipv4 anym
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:38:32PM +0200, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
> here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
> only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
> recor
* Bill Cole:
> Some have IPv6 connectivity and address space but no motivation to
> make their mail systems use IPv6.
A case of what we call Public Servant Mikado (whoever moves first has
lost). ;-) Seriously, I think that if one can support IPv6, one should
do it. Good hosting services and ISPs
On 8 May 2020, at 12:38, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
records in the
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:38:32PM +0200, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here:
> Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
> "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only
On 08/05/2020 17:38, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here:
> Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
> "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6 records i
Hi,
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here:
> Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
> "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6 records in the
> DNS, no A / ipv4 anymore?
I would not yet advise to run
Hi all,
I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here: Is
it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
"mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6 records in the
DNS, no A / ipv4 anymore?
Michael
- EOM for impatien
27 matches
Mail list logo
