On 11/17/2010 02:30 PM, Chris G wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:04:57PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
I would expect that dnsmasq is documented, and the documentation should
cover sufficient detail to help you avoid this illegal RRset combination.
You should only bother the "gurus/maintainers"
Chris G put forth on 11/17/2010 5:50 AM:
> That's one answer of course, thanks, for the moment I have changed my
> local DNS server so that it returns a LAN address for zbmc.eu as well as
> mws.zbmc.eu. If that causes other issues (I don't think it will) then
> I'll use the above [] syntax.
Some
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:04:57PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:32:24PM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> > > It is not legal for a DNS CNAME RRset to coexist with other data for
> > > the same domain name. Nor should you have multiple CNAME records for
> > > the same domain.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:32:24PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > It is not legal for a DNS CNAME RRset to coexist with other data for
> > the same domain name. Nor should you have multiple CNAME records for
> > the same domain.
> >
> > If "mdw.zmbc.edu" is a host with "A" records, it must not be a CN
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:25:52PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:47:45AM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> > ch...@dps:/etc/postfix$ host mws.zbmc.eu
> > mws.zbmc.eu has address 192.168.1.4
> > mws.zbmc.eu is an alias for zbmc.eu.
> > mws.zbmc.eu is an alias fo
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:47:45AM +, Chris G wrote:
> ch...@dps:/etc/postfix$ host mws.zbmc.eu
> mws.zbmc.eu has address 192.168.1.4
> mws.zbmc.eu is an alias for zbmc.eu.
> mws.zbmc.eu is an alias for zbmc.eu.
> zbmc.eu mail is handled by 10 zbmc.eu.
It is not legal for
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:47:45AM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> ... and that has resolved the DNS/IP problem at least though I'm still
> getting "relaying denied". So now the relayhost (192.168.1.4) is
> rejecting the E-Mail from the client (192.168.1.2) even though I have:-
>
> mynetworks = 12
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:34:50PM -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 2:03 PM, Chris G wrote:
> >Er, it's Postfix isn't it? :-) Or have I misunderstood completely
> >(quite likely!).
> >
> >When I 'telnet mws.zbmc.eu 25' from the client it does connect to
> >mws.zbmc.eu (192
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:42:21PM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, mouss wrote:
>
> >so, your client says
> > relay=zbmc.eu[84.45.228.40]
> >and your server says
> > reject: RCPT from unknown[84.45.228.40]
> >
> >So your client and server have the same IP. This means that
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17:17PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Le 16/11/2010 19:58, Chris G a écrit :
> >On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +, Chris G wrote:
> >>
> It sounds like you have both Postfix and Sendmail on the same s
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, mouss wrote:
so, your client says
relay=zbmc.eu[84.45.228.40]
and your server says
reject: RCPT from unknown[84.45.228.40]
So your client and server have the same IP. This means that they run on the
same box. is it so? if so, why didn't you say it before?
Le 16/11/2010 19:58, Chris G a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +, Chris G wrote:
It sounds like you have both Postfix and Sendmail on the same systems,
and perhaps confused about which MTA is handling which mail.
On 11/16/2010 2:03 PM, Chris G wrote:
Er, it's Postfix isn't it? :-) Or have I misunderstood completely
(quite likely!).
When I 'telnet mws.zbmc.eu 25' from the client it does connect to
mws.zbmc.eu (192.168.1.4) and mws.zbmc.eu reports the connection to be
coming from 192.168.1.2 which is dps
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:58:06PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:50:02PM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> > So where is there a system sending this mail which appears to be
> > 84.45.228.40?
> >
> > From what I can see in the logs the mail isn't going out to the outside
> >
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> > > It sounds like you have both Postfix and Sendmail on the same systems,
> > > and perhaps confused about which MTA is handling which mail.
> >
> > When I say 'sendmail
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:50:02PM +, Chris G wrote:
> So where is there a system sending this mail which appears to be
> 84.45.228.40?
>
> From what I can see in the logs the mail isn't going out to the outside
> world and coming back in, it's just going from 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.4.
Th
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:27:56PM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Chris G wrote:
>
> >Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> >reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
> >that the connection is from 84.45.228.40.
>
> Be
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > It sounds like you have both Postfix and Sendmail on the same systems,
> > and perhaps confused about which MTA is handling which mail.
>
> When I say 'sendmail' I just mean the postfix executable of that name
> which is used by mutt (am
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:13:48PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:06:27PM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:34:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Chris G:
> > > > Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> > > > reas
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Chris G wrote:
Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
that the connection is from 84.45.228.40.
Because that's where it came from.
Wherever I look on my LAN the IP addres
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:06:27PM +, Chris G wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:34:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Chris G:
> > > Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> > > reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
> > > that t
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:34:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris G:
> > Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> > reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
> > that the connection is from 84.45.228.40.
>
> Because the operating syste
Chris G:
> Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
> that the connection is from 84.45.228.40.
Because the operating system kernel said so when Postfix asked.
Wietse
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:52:36AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> >I have a small SoHo network of machines and I have postfix installed on
> >most of them for sending mail. The machines sit behind a NAT router
> >which connects them to the internet, the domain name (as seen from
Chris G wrote:
I have a small SoHo network of machines and I have postfix installed on
most of them for sending mail. The machines sit behind a NAT router
which connects them to the internet, the domain name (as seen from the
outside world) is zbmc.eu. All the machines are running xubuntu 10.0
I have a small SoHo network of machines and I have postfix installed on
most of them for sending mail. The machines sit behind a NAT router
which connects them to the internet, the domain name (as seen from the
outside world) is zbmc.eu. All the machines are running xubuntu 10.04
and have postfi
26 matches
Mail list logo
