On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:54:46AM -0400, John Thorvald Wodder II via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > maybe this header_checks example works :
> > /^(To|From|Cc|Reply-To):.*@stupidspammers\.example/ DISCARD
> > postmap /etc/postfix/header_checks
> > and in main.cf :
> > header_checks = regexp:/etc/p
On Jul 30, 2024, at 16:52, Dimitris T. via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> not sure why you don't just block the ip/subnet of that client in firewall
> (?) or just try postscreen + postscreen_access_list with client ip/subnet..
I wouldn't expect IP-based blocking to work for long, as servers can cha
On Jul 31, 2024, at 06:05, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> Dnia 30.07.2024 o godz. 16:19:01 John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
> pisze:
>> The "access" file currently contains REJECT lines for both
>> "spamgateway.nil" (no leading period) and ".spamgateway.nil" (leading
>> per
On 2024-07-30 at 16:13:07 UTC-0400 (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:13:07 -0400)
John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I'm not claiming that "spamgateway.nil" is the actual domain. I'm
using a placeholder here because I don't want to draw attention to an
actual, real domain.
On 2024-07-30 at 15:28:58 UTC-0400 (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:28:58 -0400)
John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
(I previously posted this request for help on ServerFault but got no
responses, so I'm hoping the official Postfix mailing list will go
better.)
This has al
Dnia 30.07.2024 o godz. 16:19:01 John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
pisze:
> The "access" file currently contains REJECT lines for both
> "spamgateway.nil" (no leading period) and ".spamgateway.nil" (leading
> period), and I did the postmap-and-restart dance after updating it, but
> the e-m
On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
For actual support, you can reduce the detective work providing
CONCRETE details as in https://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
Actual configuration as reported by Postfix.
On 30.07.24 16:13, John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users wrote
not sure why you don't just block the ip/subnet of that client in
firewall (?) or just try postscreen + postscreen_access_list with
client ip/subnet..
is it coming from gmail or another too-big-to-block sender?
The "access" file currently contains REJECT lines for both "spamgateway.nil" (no
On Jul 30, 2024, at 16:13, Darren Rambaud via Postfix-users
wrote:
> In `/etc/postfix/access`, did you try adding all of these entries?
> stupidspammers.example REJECT
> .stupidspammers.example REJECT
> spamgateway.nil REJECT
>
> .spamgateway.nil REJECT
> Then re-run postmap and restart postfi
In `/etc/postfix/access`, did you try adding all of these entries?
stupidspammers.example REJECT
.stupidspammers.example REJECT
spamgateway.nil REJECT
.spamgateway.nil REJECT
Then re-run postmap and restart postfix?
Documentation for postfix indicate this should work to block all e-mails
or
On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users:
>> On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:36, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users:
(I previously posted this request for help on ServerFault but got
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-07-30 21:36:
Those tables have no effect on the content of message headers. For
that, the tables are called header_checks.
However, you may be better off with rspamd.
or simple milter-regex
rspamd is most of the time ok with default config, but
John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users:
> On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:36, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> >
> > John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users:
> >> (I previously posted this request for help on ServerFault but got
> >> no responses, so I'm hoping the official Postfix mailing
On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:36, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users:
>> (I previously posted this request for help on ServerFault but got
>> no responses, so I'm hoping the official Postfix mailing list will
>> go better.)
>
> Your access tables can o
John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users:
> (I previously posted this request for help on ServerFault but got
> no responses, so I'm hoping the official Postfix mailing list will
> go better.)
Your access tables can only affect the client DNS domain name, and
domain names that appear in SMTP comm
15 matches
Mail list logo
