Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Michael Grimm via Postfix-users:
>> I do have an smtp2go account created to get those mails sent before going
>> through the tedious way of becoming delisted my IPs.
>> Currently I have to modify transport_maps to get those stuck
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users:
> I do have an smtp2go account created to get those mails sent before going
> through the tedious way of becoming delisted my IPs.
> Currently I have to modify transport_maps to get those stuck mails resent via
> smtp2go.
> Now my question: How c
an this be done without manual interference via
transport_maps?
Thanks in advance and regards,
Michael
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hello Wietse,
It would be really a solution, thank you :)
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 01/05/2025 19:17, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
I have given this some thought and conclude that most of Postfix
isn't architected to report a hard error for an '
ould have to go overboard and prepend the full key to the stored
data).
Wietse
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
tain up to 120-130 chars, I end I decided
that limit localpart with regex up to 200 chars is big enough to not any
user complains and at same time not face any issues with SRS or whatever.
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
_______
Postfix-use
* Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users [250430 10:25]:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:57:41AM -0400, Marvin Renich via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > * Bill Cole via Postfix-users [250430 09:23]:
> > > As a full "Message Transport Agent" (MTA) handling
Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a way to transfer images and videos from my mobile
> devices to an OS X computer on my local network by emailing that
> information locally, where I would like to have a
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:57:41AM -0400, Marvin Renich via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Bill Cole via Postfix-users [250430 09:23]:
> > As a full "Message Transport Agent" (MTA) handling initial mail submission,
>
>
> Message Transfer Agent
>
>
> See e.g.
* Bill Cole via Postfix-users [250430 09:23]:
> As a full "Message Transport Agent" (MTA) handling initial mail submission,
Message Transfer Agent
See e.g. RFC 6409 and RFC 5598.
...Marvin
_______
Postfix-users mailing list --
On 2025-04-29 at 19:10:19 UTC-0400 (Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:10:19 -0400)
Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
How do most people use Postfix?
As a full "Message Transport Agent" (MTA) handling initial mail
submission, SMTP relaying, mail exchanger ("MX&qu
lawful. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. Please visit:
http://www.hightechcampus.com/go/pages/disclaimer for the most recent
disclaimer.
_______
Postfix-use
ess of installing SSH and SFTP.
I appreciate your tips. I will look into Dovecot as well.
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
April 29, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Dnia 29.04.2025 o godz. 19:10:19 Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users pisze:
A local email server would be
Dnia 29.04.2025 o godz. 19:10:19 Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> A local email server would be useful for many purposes as an
> additional method for communicating between all the different types
> of devices on the network, in particular for being able to send
> fil
;t easily be interfaced with email clients?
What is it about private networks that mail programs don't like? Aren't
private networks essentially the same as larger ones where the
difference is mostly just one of configuration?
Thanks for your help.
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-
Dnia 29.04.2025 o godz. 15:50:11 Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> I'm looking for a way to transfer images and videos from my mobile
> devices to an OS X computer on my local network by emailing that
> information locally, where I would like to have a Postfix server
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users:
> On 19/04/2025 13:09, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > On 19/04/2025 13:09, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > To rewrite envelope recipients, use "virtual_aliases", not
> > "recipient_canonica
ith Postfix. Does anyone know of any good links for doing that?
Thanks,
Edward
John Levine via Postfix-users <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
April 29, 2025 at 4:54 PM
There are several. The most popular is MacDroid, I use Phone Mechanic.
They all transfer over a USB cable which is
It appears that Bill Cole via Postfix-users
said:
>You could easily turn on SMB file sharing on that OS X machine. iOS has
>builtin SMB support via the Files app and while I don't really track
>Android capabilities, I am sure that if there isn't a builtin SMB
>client,
On 2025-04-29 at 16:18:19 UTC-0400 (Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:18:19 -0400)
Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
On Android, I use an app called WiFi Transfer Pro which enables me to
just copy files directly across the wireless network using my desktop
web browser
ere
> in the Apple ecosystem that serves the same purpose.
airdrop
randy
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2025-04-29 at 15:50:11 UTC-0400 (Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:50:11 -0400)
Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I'm looking for a way to transfer images and videos from my mobile
devices to an OS X computer on my local network by emailing that
information lo
On 4/29/25 15:50, Rooma Zoom Zoom via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello,
I’m looking for a way to transfer images and videos from my mobile
devices to an OS X computer on my local network by emailing that
information locally, where I would like to have a Postfix server running
on OS X which would
ments?
Thanks for your help.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 19/04/2025 13:09, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On 19/04/2025 13:09, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
To rewrite envelope recipients, use "virtual_aliases", not
"recipient_canonical_maps".
Hi Viktor, sorry, but for me this not solution. The whole
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:43:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > This is a sketch, fill in the details and test with care.
>
> I wish this were easier. If Postfix were to provide native support,
> what should it look like? I'm thinking of an interme
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> So you are generating separate copies (always_bcc), but you SHOULD
> instead use "recipient_bcc_maps", which makes it possible to encode the
> original address in the localpart of the per-recipient Bcc address,
> and the resulting envelope
On 2025-04-24 at 04:42:00 UTC-0400 (Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:42:00 +0300)
Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:27 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
As usual in such cases, I think you can write a milter that would do
the job
exactly as you
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:27 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
> As usual in such cases, I think you can write a milter that would do the job
> exactly as you want.
I'm not sure that I have enough skills to write a milter, but this is
my plan B :)
--
Best regards,
Mi
Dnia 24.04.2025 o godz. 10:21:37 Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users pisze:
> Yes, it's about email archiving on edge server, even before relaying
> messages to internal servers for checking for spam, viruses, etc.
> Currently i'm adding headers in the messages and then do alway
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:21:37AM +0300, Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:46 AM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > Well, that's rather important information, that wasn't originally
> > provided. So this an email ar
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:46 AM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Well, that's rather important information, that wasn't originally
> provided. So this an email archiving use case. In that case,
> might it not be possibl/desirable to archive a separate copy
>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:37:37AM +0300, Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users wrote:
> Unfortunately, for internal purposes we need to store not only copies
> of messages, but also envelope headers. Sendmail with a full session
> log was the ideal solution, but we are (finally!) abandoning
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:46 PM Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Well, the very way Bcc works is that Bcc recipients are put in the envelope,
> but they aren't put into "To:" or "Cc:" headers in the message. So if you
> want to add recipients that are i
o split the envelope
for relayed messages into separate deliveries for each recipient, then
you can use the "O" option of smtp(8) for the associated transport
and have "X-Original-To" headers added.
--
Viktor.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote in
<20250423194645.ga12...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 23.04.2025 o godz. 20:32:31 Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users pisze:
|>
|>> Why do you want to break Bcc by recording all envelope recipients in
|>> headers? Unless you can guarantee
Dnia 23.04.2025 o godz. 20:32:31 Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> > Why do you want to break Bcc by recording all envelope recipients in
> > headers? Unless you can guarantee that all messages are
> > single-recipient, or that Bcc is never used/intended by the
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 6:06 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Why do you want to break Bcc by recording all envelope recipients in
> headers? Unless you can guarantee that all messages are
> single-recipient, or that Bcc is never used/intended by the user,
> adding suc
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:35:54PM +0300, Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users wrote:
> I want to add custom headers with "envelope from" and "envelope to" info
> received emails. To do this, I added the following lines to
> smtpd_relay_restrictions:
Why do you want
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users writes:
Postfix does not know which IPs are "routable", and which not. All
IP literals are exempt from the above checks.
On 22.04.25 13:00, Phillip Susi via Postfix-users wrote:
It doesn't matter whether they are routable or not; it isn&
See https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_reject
(evaluate smtpd_client/helo/sender_restrictions 'immediately'
instead of postponing them until RCPT TO).
Wietse
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@post
:00 postfix/qmgr[2381502]: 675C218000D0:
from=, size=7269, nrcpt=3 (queue active)
For 1st recipient check do before queue, and then message go to queue and
then checks do for other recipients.
--
Best regards,
Mike Teplynin
_______
Postfix-users mailing
to Dovecot documentation.
You can find the updated Postfix source code at the mirrors listed
at https://www.postfix.org/.
Wietse
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users writes:
> Postfix does not know which IPs are "routable", and which not. All
> IP literals are exempt from the above checks.
It doesn't matter whether they are routable or not; it isn't a fqdn and
so should be rejected due to rej
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:48:16PM +0200, Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Yes, you are right - in $mydestination is, as described in the
> documentation, $myorigin = tachtler.net - NOT - included and
> $virtual_mailbox_domains = tachtler.net (only).
>
> So, if I
Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users:
> Hello Viktor,
>
> First of all, thank you for your answers and your patience with me.
>
> Yes, you are right - in $mydestination is, as described in the
> documentation, $myorigin = tachtler.net - NOT - included and
> $virtual_mailbox_d
d with DeepL.com (free version)
On 4/21/25 08:51, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:33:44AM +0200, Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
wrote:
When creating the e-mail using
echo “Test email (virtual domain)” | /usr/sbin/sendmail root
Is not taken into account i
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:33:44AM +0200, Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
wrote:
> When creating the e-mail using
>
> echo “Test email (virtual domain)” | /usr/sbin/sendmail root
>
> Is not taken into account in the subsequent configuration of virtual domains
>
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
wrote:
I have a question of understanding:
If virtual_alias_maps is configured and working successfully and an email
address is defined in /etc/aliases to forward the emails of th
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I have a question of understanding:
>
> If virtual_alias_maps is configured and working successfully and an email
> address is defined in /etc/aliases to forward the emails of the root user,
> th
ething?
Thanks in advance for an explanation.
Regards
Klaus.
--
---
e-Mail : kl...@tachtler.net
Homepage: https://www.tachtler.net
DokuWiki: https://dokuwiki.tachtler.net
---
________
And you do!! JhillOn Apr 19, 2025 9:52 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:John Hill via Postfix-users:
> I was deleting file then, copy in new one.
>
> I stopped the deletion. It seems to work.
>
> I thought of writing directly to the file in the maps directory.
>
John Hill via Postfix-users:
> I was deleting file then, copy in new one.
>
> I stopped the deletion. It seems to work.
>
> I thought of writing directly to the file in the maps directory.
>
> But not sure about the file locking you mentioned.
>
> I'll do some
stfix-users wrote:
John Hill via Postfix-users:
When I manually update my lmdb access tables, adding or deleting. I see
this message in the log: error: accept connection: Socket operation on
non-socket.
The line before this error: table
lmdb:/etc/postfix/maps/postscreen_blacklist has changed - finishi
John Hill via Postfix-users:
> When I manually update my lmdb access tables, adding or deleting. I see
> this message in the log: error: accept connection: Socket operation on
> non-socket.
>
> The line before this error: table
> lmdb:/etc/postfix/maps/postscreen_bla
Am 19.04.25 um 17:51 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
But it may be time for Postfix to no longer enable the PIX workarounds
by default.
agreed. If an operator choose a security device in front if it's MTA that strip
down SMTP like 1980,
he choose plaintext smtp only. I
Just checking
Thanks
--john
On 4/19/25 12:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:11:11AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
When I manually update my lmdb access tables, adding or deleting. I see this
message in the log: error: accept connection
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:11:11AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> When I manually update my lmdb access tables, adding or deleting. I see this
> message in the log: error: accept connection: Socket operation on
> non-socket.
>
> The line before this error: table
>
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 05:12:06PM +0200, Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
wrote:
> #smtp_tls_security_level = may
> smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
>
> for a while, until just now. When I noticed that some target mx
> destination had delivery issues with this, I put the
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > I recommend against "recipient_canonical_maps", it rewrites a subset of
> > the message headers, (To/Cc or Resent-To/Resent-Cc), while in almost all
> > cases one shoul
Hello,
ofc NOT. But that then works.
Danke Ömer!
Am 19.04.2025 um 17:18 schrieb Ömer Güven:
mx2.neumuenster.demay
Have you tried:
neumuenster.demay
Best,
Ömer
Am 19.04.2025 um 17:15 schrieb Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
:
Dear Postfixians,
I have noticed
>
> mx2.neumuenster.demay
Have you tried:
> neumuenster.demay
Best,
Ömer
> Am 19.04.2025 um 17:15 schrieb Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
> :
>
> Dear Postfixians,
>
> I have noticed the following.
>
> In main.cf I had
&g
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
work OK. I am using postmap -i on the tables.
I create access tables in a working directory, then copy them to the
postfix maps directory and run postmap.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thx
--john
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users
On 18.04.25 22:00, Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users wrote:
> So you say it's better to do recipient_canonical_maps on incoming mail?
> How it will improve situation? SRS will still throw same error and
> Postfix still reply with 4xx, no?
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:13:52P
It works if next hop accept email inside of smtp session and then fails,
this not a problem.
--
*Best Regards,*
Dmitriy Alekseev
DevOps Engineer
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, 16:12 Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users, <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Dmitriy Alekseev via Postfix-users skrev
Dmitriy Alekseev via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-04-19 15:59:
Reverse path is must to be in place to properly process bounces back
if due to any reason dst will fail to get email, and that's all.
this is working if hosts does not accept and later bounces
SRS is not helpfull
Reverse path is must to be in place to properly process bounces back if due
to any reason dst will fail to get email, and that's all.
--
*Best Regards,*
Dmitriy Alekseev
DevOps Engineer
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, 15:40 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users, <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote
r_canonical_maps = ...
> >
> > is close enough. For header rewriting, use "canonical_maps", which
> > consistently rewrites all headers.
--
Viktor.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
I do not rewrite any headers and have 0 intention to do so as it break
existing dkim and arc signatures. No modification except envelopes needed.
--
*Best Regards,*
Dmitriy Alekseev
DevOps Engineer
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, 13:10 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users, <
postfix-users@postfix.org>
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:13:52PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> On 18.04.25 22:00, Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users wrote:
> > So you say it's better to do recipient_canonical_maps on incoming mail?
> > How it will improve situation? SRS w
On 18/04/2025 20:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
I remember now when I implemented SRS, I configured separate postfix
instance for outgoing mail. This is the postfix issue described in
postsrs docs: canonical maps are processed when mail is being
received.
Yep, I have 2
On 18/04/2025 20:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
I remember now when I implemented SRS, I configured separate postfix
instance for outgoing mail. This is the postfix issue described in
postsrs docs: canonical maps are processed when mail is being received.
Yep, I have 2
On 2025-04-18 at 14:06:57 UTC-0400 (Fri, 18 Apr 2025 20:06:57 +0200)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I don't recommend enforcing length shorter than mentioned RFC minimum of 64.
On 18.04.25 14:53, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
That's easy
On 2025-04-18 at 14:06:57 UTC-0400 (Fri, 18 Apr 2025 20:06:57 +0200)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> I don't recommend enforcing length shorter than mentioned RFC minimum of 64.
That's easy enough to enforce with a regexp/pcre sender access ma
strange, according to
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#socketmap_max_reply_size the
maximum reply size is 100k by default. I use postsrd without
problems.
On 18.04.25 18:47, Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users wrote:
want to highlight this is not permanent issue and this is first time
regex.conf:
>> reject
>> header /From/ /^user@baddom\.tld$/i and envrcpt /@example\.com$/i
>>
>
It looks like this is the place to start?
https://github.com/milter-regex/milter-regex/tree/main
Can I ask usage questions about this plugin here?
Thanks,
Alex
__
> On Apr 17, 2025, at 05:36, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-17 at 05:09:25 UTC-0400 (Thu, 17 Apr 2025 02:09:25 -0700)
> Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Long IDs and not a lot of spam. Normal is in the 10s daily.
s just in localpart*...
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 15:51, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
_______________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2025-04-17 at 21:05:50 UTC-0400 (Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:05:50 -0400)
Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Hi Bill
>
> Thanks for your reply..
Always happy to be of help.
[...]
> OK:
>
> % postconf | grep 'postscreen_.*_\(enable\|action\)'
On 2025-04-17 at 23:19:06 UTC-0400 (Fri, 18 Apr 2025 05:19:06 +0200)
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-04-18 03:05:
>
>>> Hard evidence of that would be helpful to show exactly what is logged and
&
On 18.04.25 11:17, Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users wrote:
I get a bit annoying spam lately to rcpts like
<1239123129381239...@example.com> where localpart is bunch of numbers
and just localpart alone length is more then 300 chars.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5321#s
and have blocklist rules (and
meta rules with more flexibility), but I feel like doing it at the
SMTP level would be easier, and also avoid quarantining the junk when
it should just be rejected.___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.o
On 2025-04-17 at 20:49:12 UTC-0400 (Fri, 18 Apr 2025 02:49:12 +0200)
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> * Alex via Postfix-users:
>
>> It looks like this is the place to start?
>> https://github.com/milter-regex/milter-regex/tree/main
>
> I re
More over issue not in SRS, issue actually about postfix in general. I
don't know why there no defaults to do any validations check of
sender|rcpts.
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 13:20, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-
wrote:
see headers from my mail here, its perfect, thanks for finaly see
sys4.de knows what thay do with rspamd now :=) _______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
s
sort of task.
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 13:34, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Dmytro Alieksieiev skrev den 2025-04-18 13:25:
Hi Benn, you want propose any better alternatives for a forwarding to
not break SPF and have ability properly send emails with
here, its perfect, thanks for finaly see
sys4.de knows what thay do with rspamd now :=)
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi Benn, you want propose any better alternatives for a forwarding to
not break SPF and have ability properly send emails without DKIM?
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 13:20, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users skrev den 2025
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-04-18 11:17:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access
regexp:/etc/postfix/recipient_address_length_restrictions
...
/etc/postfix/recipient_address_length_restrictions
/^.{38,}@/554 5.1.7 Recipient address rejected
postfix/recipient_address_length_restrictions
...
/etc/postfix/recipient_address_length_restrictions
/^.{38,}@/554 5.1.7 Recipient address rejected: Localpart is too long.
38 chars and greater chosen due to SRS need also some space.
--
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
___________
Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-04-18 03:05:
Hard evidence of that would be helpful to show exactly what is logged
and
exactly what configuration postscreen is
using. https://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail gives details.
OK:
% postconf | grep 'postscreen_.*_\(e
natan via Postfix-users:
> Hi
> I known that but I terminated tls via haproxy
Then this is better discussed on an HaProxy forum.
Wietse
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-us
postfix for specific email, it not mean anything outside of
> it.
>
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, 09:53 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users,
> wrote:
> Lately, when I look at the mail queue I see IDs that end in PPn where n is an
> integer. So far, all of them have been bounces of spam.
r('From', 'Alex
')
syslog: mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]: REJECT: bad address, HELO:
mail-lf1-f42.google.com, FROM: , RCPT: ,
From: Alex , To: , Subject:
alex
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi Bill
Thanks for your reply..
>>>>> On April 17, 2025 Bill Cole via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On 2025-04-17 at 16:15:20 UTC-0400 (Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:15:20 -0400)
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>> Hi,
>
* Alex via Postfix-users:
> It looks like this is the place to start?
> https://github.com/milter-regex/milter-regex/tree/main
I recommend starting at http://benzedrine.ch/milter-regex.html instead,
because that's the official milter-regex homepage (plus, it shows the
formatted manpag
On 2025-04-17 at 16:15:20 UTC-0400 (Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:15:20 -0400)
Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Am I correct that the after greeting tests are turned off by default?
Yes. You can trust the documentation. It may require careful reading and
logical
#x27;?
thanks,
Greg
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
1 - 100 of 6903 matches
Mail list logo
