Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in <4ch3gp5r5kzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: |> Is it somehow possible to improve the interaction in between |> addressverification on the local, and greylisting on the remote |> side? I have very good experience with "AV" except for certain |> "AV"<->"AV" well "locks" that i have seen once or twice but of |> which i have forgotten anything, and its interaction with |> greylisting. | |Use a shorter negative expiration time. A longer positive |expiration time will reduce the need for follow-up probes.
Ok, thank you. I thus also reread the doc and lowered address_verify_negative_refresh_time, plus i added (fw ever that iw) unverified_sender_defer_code=451. The doc explicitly states that enhanced status codes should not be included, i therefore refrained from providing a reason=. (Just in case the 4.1.7 was what frightened them, i do not know; like i thought, there was no further connection attempt from their side after that 450 4.1.7; what a mess ..) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
