On 31/12/2024 09:35, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
There is nothing to link. postfix already supports SRV. [...]
Seriously? You refer to a draft, then don't bother to link to it, or
mention that you are the author, with an agenda to boot? What
gured mailman correctly it wouldnt care about that because it
wouldn't see yours or my original sigs, using DKIM "relaxed" doesnt work
that way either :)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times rema
?
sys4.de are not removing original DKIM sigs just adding postfix.org's,
which also fails for some reason, but ohh looky that - SPF passes :D
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidentia
On 06/11/2023 02:48, Fred Morris via Postfix-users wrote:
Let's step out of the echo chamber or petri dish or whatever.
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote: Dnia
5.11.2023 o godz. 13:53:46 Noel Butler via Postfix-users pisze: If
correctly forwarded it does not
mer) - but only if the
admins set those settings (its more a mailman problem for not enabling
them by default)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright prote
On 16/04/2015 11:40, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
> Noel Butler: 20120917
>
> Feature: RFC 7372 enhanced status code for unknown SMTP
> client hostnames. File: smtpd/smtpd_check.c
>
> Wietse
> Thanks, I assume you only introduced this into 3.x? and did not in
> 2.11
On 16/04/2015 10:58, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
> Noel Butler:
>
>> Did I miss the changes or was it omitted from 3.0 about the code change
>> from 5.7.1 to 5.7.25 ?
>>
>> "550 5.7.25 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname,"
>>
&g
Did I miss the changes or was it omitted from 3.0 about the code change
from 5.7.1 to 5.7.25 ?
"550 5.7.25 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname,"
heh, just upgraded one production box and had logwatch flood me with a
19mb file with unmatched entries :)
Cheers
or, in bind options : empty-zones-enable yes;
any server running bind not understanding this should result is two
things
1: the responsible admins resignation
2: ensuring his/her replacement upgrades to something modern.
On 16/02/2014 07:43, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 15.02.2014 22:3
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 03:50 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> I've just updated from 2.8.5 to 2.9.1 and now, when I start postfix,
> I am getting the following set of messages (that I've never seen before):
>
> /usr/local/sbin/postconf: warning: /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf: unused
> p
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 11:01 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> hm, since it contains the same data as spf1 and even hotmail itself
> has only spf1 i tend to ignore it also in the future
>
Just had a look and you're right, but as it improved our deliverable
success rates to hotmail many fold a f
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 22:33 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >no because i did not notice about spf2.0 until now
> >and do not find anything about it on openspf.org
> >http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax
> >
> >have you some good documentation/examples
> >since i am the developer of our admin
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:08 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > what type of entries are you using in your SPF record?
> > i found out that a/mx entries sometimes making troubles and since
> > we changed our backend to use only ip and let the backend
> > translate s
Bug or Doco miss-print?
SMTPD_POLICY_README on web and in source readme file says:
11 policy_time_limit = 3600
Note: the "policy_time_limit" parameter will not show up in "postconf"
command output before Postfix version 2.9. This
(Fair enough, it's been working for years anyway)
Starting
Folks,
Has been a while since I've looked at this, but at present if we need to
alias a domain, eg f...@example.com to f...@example.net
we are using mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_alias_domains.cf after other
entries in our virtual_alias_maps
and using
query = SELECT email from virtual_users where e
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 09:26 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>
> " i know all you know nothing" then kill the thread so people can't
> show you might be wrong or defend themselves, oh my. how nice, now I
> recall why i probably left this list last time! I hope
silent
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:42 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse:
> > [About blocking all mail from an ISP because some customer sent spam]
> > Such an approach makes sense only if receiving one spam message is
> > a bigger problem than losing a larger amount of legitimat
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 09:40 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > .
>
> This illustrates what you get when blocking all mail from an ISP
> just because some customer sent some email that hit some spamtrap.
>
We do it here, I've done it for 5 years or so, little problems at all
given the r
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 07:52 -0400, John Peach wrote:
> > Right, so, how is THAT a false positive, it is a justifiable listing
> > if they became part of the problem.
> >
> I never said it was a false positive. Just that it's a waste of time
> trying to get delisted; we gave up with that years a
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:13 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
>
> > I have an automated script that runs over all of our mail servers log
> > files daily searching for IP's that send to
> > known spamtrap addresses and also on my private server (this domain),
> > addresses that never existed, and
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 12:37 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> Hehe, noticed I've got just 2 replies on my thread from Noel Butler,
> rest is missing:
>
LOL, hrmm Q, is the postfix lists the only mail coming from
camomile.cloud9.net? or do these servers host other
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 21:48 -0500, Al Zick wrote:
> > internal mail which is only imap would be
> >
> >
> > require ["fileinto"];
> > if header :contains "X-Spam-Status" ["Yes,"] {
> > fileinto "Junk";
> > stop;
> > }
>
>
>
> I have found 2 packages:
> dovecot-sieve
> libsieve
>
>
> Could y
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:15 -0400, John Peach wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000
> Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked f
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
> are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
>
That is complete FUD, yes, I know what their website says, but knowing
the people
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 14:37 -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> Let me take a step back. Let us say that my
> main.cf looks like this:
>
> # i don't do local delivery on this machine, so:
> mydestination =
> #
> relayhost = outgo.arlut.utexas.edu
> transport_map = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>
^
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:37 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Butler:
> > > if you're in this list for some time, you probably know that spf
> > > debates are taboo here. Please accept my apologies for my post (I
> > > didn't realise that I was putting
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 00:24 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Le 06/10/2010 00:37, Noel Butler a écrit :
>
> > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:46 +0200, mouss wrote:
> >
> > > Le 04/10/2010 23:03, Terry Gilsenan a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Configure postfi
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:13 +1100, James Gray wrote:
> > We've used it for years, had very little complaints, maybe half a
> > dozen in all that time.
> > SPF is a "must use" IMHO, and by use of "-all" ... providing you
> > configure your DNS correctly.
> >
>
>
>
> ...and then a user puts
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:46 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Le 04/10/2010 23:03, Terry Gilsenan a écrit :
>
> > Configure postfix to use SPF, and setup an SPF record in DNS for
> > that domain.
> >
>
>
> then what? you reject mail because of spf fail? that would lead to
> false positives...
>
>
We'
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, we have over the weekend ran two testbeds at full thrashing
> with in house written scripts, the timings show after 57 hours
+1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> I have a question about postfix looking up users after it would
> clearly have got a "not a local domain" response.
>
>
> 30 Query SELECT 1 FROM virtual_domains WHERE
> name='exmple.net' AND active =
Hi Wietse,
I have a question about postfix looking up users after it would clearly
have got a "not a local domain" response.
30 Query SELECT 1 FROM virtual_domains WHERE
name='exmple.net' AND active ='1'
31 Query SELECT destination FROM view_aliases WHERE
email='someu...@e
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 15:54 -0600, Scott Miller wrote:
> I'm having a bit of an issue I'm hoping someone can help me out with. I've
> recently replaced Sendmail with Postfix, and so far so good. I also ran a
> script written by Russel Nelson that converts all e-mail located in
> /var/spool/mail
33 matches
Mail list logo
