On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 11:01 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > hm, since it contains the same data as spf1 and even hotmail itself > has only spf1 i tend to ignore it also in the future > Just had a look and you're right, but as it improved our deliverable success rates to hotmail many fold a few years back, I won't give my CSRs headaches by risking influx of support requests/bitches over mail not getting through :) certainly doesn't harm anything even if they no longer give increases in reputation for those publishing it. Personally never liked it, I did trial it once, but dumped it pretty quickly, it played merry hell with those using mailing lists where as spfv1 is perfectly fine.
<<attachment: face-smile.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
