On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 00:24 +0200, mouss wrote: > Le 06/10/2010 00:37, Noel Butler a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:46 +0200, mouss wrote: > > > > > Le 04/10/2010 23:03, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : > > > > > > > Configure postfix to use SPF, and setup an SPF record in DNS for > > > > that domain. > > > > > > > > > > > > > then what? you reject mail because of spf fail? that would lead to > > > false positives... > > > > > > > > > > > > We've used it for years, had very little complaints, maybe half a > > dozen in all that time. > > SPF is a "must use" IMHO, and by use of "-all" ... providing you > > configure your DNS correctly. > > > > > if you're in this list for some time, you probably know that spf > debates are taboo here. Please accept my apologies for my post (I > didn't realise that I was putting my foot in that old hole!).
I doubt July this year constitutes a long time , I was temp sub'd a year or so ago or a few weeks with a question (that was never able to answered anyway, so I left.) Can't recall teh reason for re-subbing. But I note, neither WV or VD mentioned it is taboo, but I know spf is like religion :) worship it or loath it.
