On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:15 -0400, John Peach wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000 > Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote: > > > > > > > > > sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and > > > are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them. > > > > > > > > > That is complete FUD, yes, I know what their website says, but knowing > > the people behind them I can assure you it has never been demanded, it > > is a deterrent, a request to their ticketing system is all it takes to > > get out, please don't fall for the mistruths by those who have been in > > SORBS, infact, better to ask yourself why they were in there in the > > first place. > > > > ... because we have so-called educated professionals who fall for > phishing scams on a regular basis, despite regular warnings about the > same.
Right, so, how is THAT a false positive, it is a justifiable listing if they became part of the problem. I have an automated script that runs over all of our mail servers log files daily searching for IP's that send to known spamtrap addresses and also on my private server (this domain), addresses that never existed, and can't exist (marked as 'baduser' in our adduser scripts), those it finds are automatically entered into our local DNSBL which is used by other Uni's, ISP's and corporations over here, publicly accessible, but not advertised. I get a daily diff so I see the new entries, but I don't review/host/whois them, its just an interesting "count how many new entries" really and its typically 8 to 15 a day, and, AFAIC, they can stay in there forever because they are clearly miscreants.
