retired in
> 2021.
>
>
>
> Every main.cf config I've seen uses commas. Ive added them to your quote
> below.
>
> On 7/6/2024 11:18 PM, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Main:
> submission_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_rbl_clien
Thanks John! You nailed it, made the two changes you suggested, and it is
now blocking, client will be happy,
On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 8:52 PM John Fawcett via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 07/07/2024 06:18, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Howdy,
Howdy,
I've never seen the point in this before, but i've been asked by a client
to implement it if possible, that is, place dnsbl checks on submission and
smtps connections, I've tried a few combinations but it does not seem to be
working, no doubt someone can see the error and slap me a new one
ntomas via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 24.10.23 14:35, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I need a refresher hand with DKIM, we have in main.cf
> >
> >smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8892
> >non_smtpd_milters = $smtp
Howdy,
been out of sysadmining for a few years as I was promoted to network ops,
but with dose of that-virus going round our office the sysadmin teams are
all evicted for 2 weeks :)
I need a refresher hand with DKIM, we have in main.cf
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8892
non_
On 4/27/14, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> why do you reply off-list and top-posting?
why do you act like list nazi Harold Reindl?
pfft nobody cares about your shit
On 10/28/13, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/27/2013 4:30 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> submission_client_restrictions =
>> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/submission.hosts
>
> Typically this first line is all that would be used here to reje
Following from Charles's thread, but, not directly related, did not
want to hijack it so I'll ask for clarification here.
Having Seen Viktors statement about submission_*_restrictions = and
not putting all that crud into master.cf (yes, my bad too)
If I use:
submission_client_restrictions =
On 3/10/12, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:08 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> > what type of entries are you using in your SPF record?
>> > i found out that a/mx entries sometimes making troubles and since
&
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> logs are no good because it simply says rejected (ip) spf -all method.
>>
>> all other settings wont help e
On 3/10/12, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick Edwards:
>> Is the smtp bind address correct method? or inet_interfaces?
>
> Everybody already knows that smtp_bind_address and smtp_bind_address6
> set the correct IP address for SENDING mail.
>
> If the RECEIVING server flags an
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
>> I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
>> Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx o
On 3/10/12, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick Edwards:
>> I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
>> uses the correct IP, the relays are denied for spf failure on the
>> main server, even though they are all permitted in spf RR, ok, evident
>
> So
Hi,
I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
mynetworks etc all setup right.
I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
uses the correct IP, the rela
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/24/2011 9:37 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> > Merry Christmas All!
> >
> > I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
> >
> > : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sahil Tandon:
> > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> >
> > In the absence of full information, here's a WAG:
> >
> > > ...
> > > : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT f
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> > I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
> >
> > : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
> &
Merry Christmas All!
I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
rejected: cannot find your hostname,
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[115.153.142.125]: 550 5.7.1 Client
host rejected: cannot find
Hello,
This error triggers only with postfix and milter-regex with ipv6
connections.
warning: milter unix:/var/smfs/milter-regex.sock: can't read SMFIC_CONNECT
reply packet header: Success
postfix 2.8.3
relevant section:
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/smfs/milter-regex.sock
milter_default_action =
I know this is a few days old, but i've been away on holidays
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:25 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > Gary Smith wrote:
>
> > >> As already stated, there's not a huge amount that you can do on your
> > >> own. However, i
"Make sure your PTR and A records match. For every IP address, there should
be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain. If a host is
multi-homed, (more than one IP address) make sure that all IP addresses have
a corresponding PTR record (not just the first one)."
Apparently, I'm led to be
s
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-09-22 6:03 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> > By the way, I need to thank you, given your discussion with Timo was one
> > that had set alarm bells off on this, and the thread with Eddie
> > confirmed the risks, can&
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, we have over the weekend ran two testbeds at full thrashing wit
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 02:22 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, we have ov
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 00:32, Nick Edwards wrote:
> > Good day all,
> > I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
> >
> > We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away
>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-09-10 5:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Indexes can speed up IMAP performance a decent amount, but they don't
> > help POP performance at all.
>
>
> As far as I know, Courier's speed issues are mostly IMAP related, so if
> you're o
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick Edwards:
> > Another quick question before I depart for work, I understand also (from
> > that other lists thread) that postfix does not support maildir++ , with
> that
> > curiosity, I googled and found
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Nick Edwards put forth on 9/10/2010 2:32 AM:
>
> > Before the fans cry foul of why not Dovecot. we have followed the list
> > thread of what may be a problem with Dovecot its author has identified
> but
> > decide
Good day all,
I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away from
Cyrus on Sunday Oct 3, we are almost ready to go but found a problem with
pop3 software we were going to use.
So basically, using postifx's
29 matches
Mail list logo
