I have no idea how gmail allowed this post, since I labelled you as a spammer (you're an outright troll, but sadly gmail has no function for trolls, only spammers) after your first post to me.
But you are the one full of it, anyone is free to read the archives of dovecot to see it affects pop3 DUE TO dovecot-lda being used, I do not know what part of Timo confirmed this you do not understand, perhaps english is not your native tongue and I don't know how to make it clearer to you in your language, either way I don't care, GPTFO Now back in the spam bin where you belong marcus On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Charles Marcus <cmar...@media-brokers.com>wrote: > On 2010-09-22 6:03 PM, Nick Edwards wrote: > > By the way, I need to thank you, given your discussion with Timo was one > > that had set alarm bells off on this, and the thread with Eddie > > confirmed the risks, can't understand Timo's attitude towards it, but as > > he said maybe dovecot is not for anyone who needs reliable pop3 in NFS. > > PLEASE stop with the FUD. > > As has already been beaten to death, dovecot HAS NO RELIABILITY PROBLEMS > WITH POP3+NFS. > > Timo's 'attitude' was *only* with respect to the issues with IMAP+NFS > (caching) and MULTIPLE delivery servers using dovecot's LDA, and Courier > and every other IMAP server, under the same circumstances, have the > exact same issues. His 'attitude' was only because the problem is > inherent to NFS, and there is really not much else he (or anyone else) > CAN do about it. > > -- > > Best regards, > > Charles >
