Re: recipient MX based routing.

2009-04-23 Thread Marc Jauvin
nd its local_data. Yes, use a local DNS cache that suppors local name overrides. "unbound" would be a good choice. Thanks to all that helped solving my problem. This is now working perfectly using unbound's "local-data" override. (got rid of bind9 caching server in th

Re: recipient MX based routing.

2009-04-23 Thread Marc Jauvin
Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:15:48PM -0400, Marc Jauvin wrote: Note: using iptables to reroute traffic for Godaddy's IP address does work, but it's unlikely to work reliably if they change those IP addresses (or add new ones to the mix). Well, how would Postf

Re: recipient MX based routing.

2009-04-23 Thread Marc Jauvin
Wietse Venema wrote: Marc Jauvin: Hi everyone, I'd like to know if there's a way to have different relayhost based on the MX records of the recipient for outgoing mail. I'd like to relay outgoing emails to multiple different domains (all going through a common mail exchange)

Re: recipient MX based routing.

2009-04-23 Thread Marc Jauvin
That works, although I would have liked it to be done within postfix. Thanks for the suggestion!!! Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:52:27PM -0400, Marc Jauvin wrote: I'd like to know if there's a way to have different relayhost based on the MX records of the rec

recipient MX based routing.

2009-04-23 Thread Marc Jauvin
Hi everyone, I'd like to know if there's a way to have different relayhost based on the MX records of the recipient for outgoing mail. I'd like to relay outgoing emails to multiple different domains (all going through a common mail exchange) to a particular relayhost. T

Re: virtual aliases/mailbox & mx records

2009-03-12 Thread Marc Jauvin
That's what I was afraid of... when you're hosting multi-thousands of domains, that's not an easy task... :( Noel Jones wrote: Marc Jauvin wrote: Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I mean: postfix has no idea if he's supposed t

Re: virtual aliases/mailbox & mx records

2009-03-12 Thread Marc Jauvin
cords were modified, then we can't "remove" those virtual mapping rules from our database. Is there something I'm missing? Wietse Venema wrote: Marc Jauvin: "virtual" maps. So at this point, if we send this customer an email at his domain, the email wil

Re: virtual aliases/mailbox & mx records

2009-03-12 Thread Marc Jauvin
ered "internally" instead of being sent to his NEW external MX host. So how can we configure postfix so that it will "realize" that the mail should be routed to the NEW MX host? Thanks in advance. Wietse Venema wrote: Marc Jauvin: I've been using Postfix for

virtual aliases/mailbox & mx records

2009-03-12 Thread Marc Jauvin
give precedence to the MX records defined for the domain, but will privilege the internal transport / mapping rules. Is there anyone out there that could give me a solution to fix this problem? Thanks! -- Marc Jauvin 514-905-6500 ext. 403 http://register4less.com