On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:00:52 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Tomas Korbar:
>> Finally,
>> This feature is useful for container deployment as you can have
>> unified configuration for multiple images.
>
>Well, I think I solved THAT problem 20 years ago, with:
>
>relayhost = $mydomain
>
>wh
On Mon, 06 Jul 2020 17:58:08 +0200, Benny Pedersen stated:
>Jerry skrev den 2020-07-06 17:31:
>
>>
>> bzgrep -e auth=0/1 "/var/log/maillog" | sed
>> 's/.*\[\([^]]*\)\].*/\1/g' | sort -V | uniq > "/tmp/Bad_IP.txt"
>>
>
>sort |
:
>> >
>> > auth=
I was using this in a script I wrote. It seemed to work correctly.
bzgrep -e auth=0/1 "/var/log/maillog" | sed 's/.*\[\([^]]*\)\].*/\1/g' | sort
-V | uniq > "/tmp/Bad_IP.txt"
--
Jerry
pgp67o4UqIITC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Yep, I'm replying to an old question.
...
OP, just following up, were you able to resolve your issues?
If so, can you post a summary please.
Jerry
On 01/15/15 12:59 PM, post...@outputservices.com wrote:
I am attempting to install postfix-2.11.3 on a Solaris 10 x86 machine.
I wa
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:48:26 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> Example domain:
>
> $ nss=$(dig +short -t ns medicaljournals.se)
> $ mx=$(dig +short -t mx medicaljournals.se | sort -n | head -1 | awk
> '{print $NF}')
>
> $ for ns in $nss; do echo "== $ns"; dig -4 +norecur +dnssec +noal
.11.1 and have ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 set in the
10-ssl.conf file. Unlike you, I am not experiencing any problems. Your
problem must be in some setting you have configured in claws-mail. You should
really check on their forum for an answer.
--
Jerry
i}^KzP9yW{)6
If I use a plain passw2ord it works, but with the special characters it
fails. I tried enclosing the entire password in double quotes, but that
failed. So, what am I missing? I tried to find some documentation on this
problem, but without success.
Thanks!
--
Jerry
ally stupid question. I will agree that on
rare occasions though I do believe that Mr. Wietse Venema does appear to have
waken up on the wrong side of the bed.
--
Jerry
. an update if you will . . .
> books in paper form may not survive, but i still read ebooks.
I am an old timer myself. I still want a hard copy in my hands to study.
--
Jerry
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:00:53 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Jerry:
>> Jun 30 15:27:42 scorpio postfix/smtpd[41654]: error: open
>> database /etc/postfix/virtual.db: No such file or directory Jun 30
>> 15:27:42 scorpio postfix/smtpd[41654]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:15:02 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Jerry:
>> Jun 30 10:34:03 scorpio postfix/smtpd[39942]: fatal: no SASL
>> authentication mechanisms
>...
>> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
>> smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
>> smtpd_sasl_securit
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:35:36 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Jerry:
>[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:05:04 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn stated:
>>
>> >
>> >On 06/30/2014 09:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> >> Jer
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:05:04 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn stated:
>
>On 06/30/2014 09:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Jerry:
>>> Jun 30 10:34:03 scorpio postfix/smtpd[39942]: fatal: no SASL
>>> authentication mechanisms
>> To write a problem report: http://ww
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:37:32 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Jerry:
>> >> I have this loaded on a FreeBSD-10/amd64 system
>> >
>> >What Postfix version? If it is 2.12 there is a pipe daemon bug
>> >between 20140320 and 20140515.
>> >
>&
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:42:39 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Jerry:
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:37:33 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>>
>> >Jerry:
>> >> I am attempting to set up virtual delivery by dovecot. Postfix is
>> >> spewing this err
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:37:33 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Jerry:
>> I am attempting to set up virtual delivery by dovecot. Postfix is spewing
>> this error message:
>>
>> Jun 30 05:05:07 scorpio postfix/master[40036]: warning:
>> process /usr/local/libexec
- - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f
${sender} -d ${recipient}
I can supply "postconf -n" if required.
--
Jerry
from my mail client to Postfix via port
587, then everything apparently works fine. However, if I send via port 25,
the "sender dependent rely" does not work and I see no sign that SASL was
used. Obviously, I have made a simple mistake, but I cannot find it.
--
Jerry
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:02:05 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn stated:
>
>On 06/29/2014 03:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> Am 29.06.2014 22:05, schrieb Edgar Pettijohn:
>>> not sure if it matters but you have smtp_sasl_type defined twice once
>>> with cyrus and once with dovecot
>> says who?
>>
>> smtp !=
Okay, I know I am an idiot, but bear with me. I had a perfectly good
Postfix/Dovecot setup working for several years. I never touched it. Then the
HD died and I cannot find any of the backups. They would be quite old anyway.
So, after fixing the sytem, I installed FreeBSD-10 and the latest versions
p.gmail.com]:587us...@gmail.com:Secret_5
That is the basic structure of the file. Obviously, it is incorrect. How do I
go about correcting it?
Thanks!
--
Jerry
In any case, unless the FreeBSD port maintainer
chooses to modify the Postfix port to allow it to compile, it doesn't make
any difference what license Berkeley 6 is under.
--
Jerry
On Mon, 12 May 2014 02:14:39 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Sahil Tandon:
>> On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 18:18:45 -0400, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> > The installation halts immediately with this error message:
>> >
>> > ===> postfix-current-2.12.20140
me time now and I would have thought that Postfix
would have supported it.
--
Jerry
12, or at least it was
on FreeBSD-8.3.
The versions put their libs, etcetera into different locations, which
can screw up a linker royally at times.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postf
p_tls_policy_maps
Why don't you post the output of: "postconf -n" and then we could tell
you.
- --
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO
ze as
> in the RFC 5114 groups).
Viktor, that is an extremely sound, well thought out approach. However,
those happy folks at GunTLS rarely talk to or even acknowledge the
"OpenSSL" folks. I have no idea what their feeling are towards
Microsoft, etcetera, but I doubt that it is favorable. Personally, this
is one reason I stear clear of GnuTLS whenever possible.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
been working fine previously, so I am unsure of what
has transpired. This is happening on a FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE amd64 system
with Postfix (2.11-20130405).
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:53:53 -0600
LuKreme articulated:
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 16:17, Jerry wrote:
>
> > Of course. this assumes that you are attempting to install Postfix
> > via the ports system.
>
> I am not, though db48 was installed via ports. I'm on my phone s
g similar to that to force it to build with DB5:
WITH_BDB_VER=5
Of course, this only works with the "postfix-current" port. To use the
latest STABLE version of Postfix in the ports, you would change the
"if" line to: ".if $(.CURDIR:M*/mail/postfix)"
Of course. t
the "/etc/make.conf" file for Postfix:
# Postfix
.if $(.CURDIR:M*/mail/postfix-current)
## Use the latest db version
WITH_BDB_VER=5
## Use MySQL 5.5
WITH_MYSQL_VER=55
.endif
Can I just leave the "WITH_MYSQL_VER=55" as is, or should I change it?
--
Jerry ✌
postfi
> Can you share me some clues to solve it?
Why not just get a valid certificate?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
5 and
> at the same time able to receive mail on port 25?
Please don't use HTML format to send email. Plain ASCII is preferred.
While you are at it, lose the the tendency to top post. Now, please
follow the directions you received when you signed up for this list.
Provide the unal
gum and walk at the same
time.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
; L O G S
Someone has way too much time on their hands!
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
2013 and Microsoft Outlook 2013 only.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/openness/archive/2013/05/31/feedback-exchange-server-and-outlook-standards.aspx
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http
it back.
> > >
> > > Also the BDB is 5.3.21 which is the latest.
I have that version installed on a FreeBSD-8.3 system and it is working
fine. OpenSSL 1.0.1e is also installed if that makes any difference. It
is working with Postfix (2.11-20130405). All are from the FreeBSD ports
tree.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
".
From the help screen:
-ssl2 - just use SSLv2
-ssl3 - just use SSLv3
-tls1_2 - just use TLSv1.2
-tls1_1 - just use TLSv1.1
-tls1 - just use TLSv1
-dtls1- just use DTLSv1
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
ess, address, ...
> When pattern matches a mail address, replace it by
> the corre- sponding address(es).
>
> Would do the job.
Yes, that is a much clearer description of how the option works.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
to start here though:
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
and http://www.postfix.org/docs.html
While you are at it, lose the impulse to post in HTML format. GMail
offers plain text format.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:27:59 +
James Griffin articulated:
> [- Thu 14.Mar'13 at 12:07:14 -0400 Kris Deugau :-]
>
> > Jerry wrote:
> > > Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For
> > > relatively fine grain sorti
mail". For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
Just my 2¢ on the matter.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
ix].
>
> Use a mail filter. If you receive all your mail in the same inbox,
> then you are working too hard.
You should be able to filter on one of the List-{mumble} entries.
Personally, I use "List-Id:" for all of my lists except Postfix, since
there isn't one to filter on
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 06:37:03 -0400
Jerry articulated:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
> Wietse Venema articulated:
>
> > Either it has become very quiet here, or something has broken.
Well then, Quanah Gibson-Mount posted about a package that you wanted
available for
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
> Either it has become very quiet here, or something has broken.
No everything is working fine. We are just allowing you time to make
all those changes that you said you would do when you had a chance to.
--
Jerry ✌
postfi
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:16:20 +0200
Jamie articulated:
> On 2013/02/26 4:59 PM, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> > in your /etc/hosts file if you were to change it to the actual
> > servername.domain.tld of your server, then the log should report
> > the actual server name vs. localhost.localdomain. I
Just a heads up for any FreeBSD users who were bitten by the resent
openssl bug. The FreeBSD ports version has been updated to
openssl-1.0.1_7 (/usr/ports/security/openssl/) and works fine now with
Postfix. I just installed and tested it. There is no need to rebuild
Postfix either.
--
Jerry ✌
it.
Yes, that is the problem. It makes you wonder if anyone actually
"TESTS" this releases in a controlled environment. Anyway, the openssl
guys are rushing a new release out any day now.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
d the
system. Actually, at this point I am thinking it might be a problem
with the MUA (claws-mail); however, I am still investigating it.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG
I
might as well start here. Nothing else was touched.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
ards them to the internet in our behalf.
Perhaps something like this is what you are looking for:
http://dyn.com/
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (
might be a nice
project for the next development version of Postfix after the current
one is released as STABLE, although I wonder how many users actually
have a real need for the feature.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO R
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:58:45 -0400
FigureoTV SFM articulated:
> Links broken.
1) Please don't "top post".
2) The links are working fine here.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT
. This can be found at
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
about these is in http://www.postconf.5.html#export_evironment etc.
I think that should be:
<http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#export_environment>
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.p
logged to the "/var/log/debug.log"? This is on a FreeBSD 8.3 system. I
don't need all of that data and would like to turn it off or at least
limit it somehow.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A
onymous
> > smtpd_tls_CAfile = /usr/local/etc/postfix/certs/cacert.pem
>
> I don't see smtpd_sasl_type listed. The default type is cyrus. Is
> that what you intend? Looks as if you're using dovecot elsewhere.
I discovered the problem. One of my soon to be EX as
; That is all. The rest is just a lot of wishful thinking that keeps
> techno-parasites in business.
>
> Wietse
+1
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_READ
d be free.
I have not see an example of MSIE balking at 1024 bit certs. Not sure
about the 512 version though and I have no working knowledge of Chrome.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:40:50 -0500
Scott Kitterman articulated:
> Being on FreeBSD or Gentoo wouldn't help if the system isn't kept up
> to date.
+1
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A
object
> > library file, and MDB documentation in /usr/{include,lib,man} or
> > /usr/local/{include,lib,man}.
>
> Thanks, sounds reasonable.
I wasn't aware of it myself. I just found this documentation though. It
is quite interesting. http://www.openldap.org/pub/hyc/mdm-pap
showing blacklist in
> public black lists..
>
> Please find below my postfix configuration:
Please review the documentation available at:
<http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html> and more specifically:
<http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html#mail> for details on how to
report
ter, provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger.
If the problem is SASL related, consider including the output from the
saslfinger tool. This can be found at
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u..
receive the following
error message
postconf: warning: smtpd_relay_restrictions: unknown parameter
Shouldn't it display the default values as shown on
<http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#smtpd_relay_restrictions>
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
___
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:05:24 + (UTC)
Mike's unattended mail articulated:
> Your whitehouse remark is an illogical "appeal to authority". You're
> actually the only one to have a post that's unworthy of response.
And yet you did ...
--
Jer
s perfectly capable of sending in plain text format.
Thank you!
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
<http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail>
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
windowsphone/en-us/howto/wp7/people/set-up-an-email-account.aspx>
and
<http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/winphone/forum/wp7-wppeople/changing-imap-and-smtp-ports-is-not-possible/20f325e7-d9ce-4bff-ae93-4ee51756c2bb>.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:18:24 +0800
Feel Zhou articulated:
> I got problem when I want to use tls support
Have you thoroughly read the documentation at this URL:
<http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html>.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seib
tain a mailserver at all
>
> winners have to paid the lotto coupons first :=)
>
> damm if thay forget, and later find its a winner, otoh players that
> dont play is sometimes olso a winner
I admit it, I am clueless as to what that reply is all about.
version
of Postfix, etcetera would be useful also. You could use the output
from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
<http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger>.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PRO
tml>, specifically
<http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html#mail>? As stated, please
include the output of the entire output of "postconf -n". While you
are at it, lose the HTML formatting.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
___
along with the other
documentation at the top of the page, this additional documentation
could be added. Considering the number of times I have seen this
question asked, I think it is something to consider.
Just my 2¢ on the matter.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
___
st. Specifically, the complete,
unaltered, output of: "postconf -n". If you have Postfix => 9.x, then
you can use "postconf -nf" to get a better display.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT
.3 STABLE, I have noticed some strange
things happening also; although not so much with Postfix due to its
excellent design.
Have you tried on a FreeBSD-9.x system to confirm it is not localized
to the 8.3 branch?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seib
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:51:16 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
>Jerry:
>> /etc/postfix/tls_policy:
>> example.com may protocols=!SSLv2:!TLSv1.1:!TLSv1.2
>>
>>
>> I did screw it up, I left out the "v"in the "TLSv1.2"
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
>Jerry:
>> FreeBSD-8.2 STABLE
>> Postfix (2.10-20120422)
>> OpenSSL 1.0.1a 19 Apr 2012
>>
>> I just updated to the latest devel version of Postfix and
>> openssl-1.0.1a.
>>
>>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
>Jerry:
>> $ ldd /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtp
>> /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtp:
>...
>> libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800b2f000)
>> libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/l
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
>Jerry:
>> FreeBSD-8.2 STABLE
>> Postfix (2.10-20120422)
>> OpenSSL 1.0.1a 19 Apr 2012
>>
>> I just updated to the latest devel version of Postfix and
>> openssl-1.0.1a.
>
>Just to be
ps = mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-vmailbox
virtual_minimum_uid = 100
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:1002
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_R
ot;openssl 1.0.1a" corrects this problem. I am going to
install it later today and see what happens.
On another note, is there a setting that would force Postfix to NOT use
"tls1_2 or tls1_1"? I am sure that it is listed somewhere in the
documentation so I just have to get my ass in
[65.55.162.200] while performing the EHLO handshake)
I am assuming that this is because of the update to "openssl-1.0.1";
however, it does not happen with any other client. Has anyone else
experienced this problem or have a possible solution?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
___
ms. Please read the "postconf" man page for
further information. For starters, "postconf -MF" and "postconf -nf"
can be used to harvest configuration details regarding Postfix.
As suggested, please read the material available at:
<http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README
quot;Mysql howto by Daniel V. Pedersen. Uses the Postfix
virtual(8) delivery agent" is apparently broken.
This is the link reported: <http://kummefryser.dk/HOWTO/>. And this is
the output:
Not Found
The requested URL /HOWTO/ was not found on this server.
Apache/2.2.20 (Ubuntu) Server a
ead this part thoroughly:
http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html#mail
Report back with the requested information and then someone can
possibly assist you.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http
rope (Poland) but do you think such things are uncommon
> elsewhere? I think they are common.
Well, there is always "Echelon"; although its true capabilities has
never been disclosed.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
r using LDAP
as opposed to MySQL. Then again, maybe not. MySQL is, at least for me,
a lot easier to setup and populate.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
would you want to
use it? And were you planning on sending both an ASCII version as well
to accommodate those users who neither want nor use HTML formatted
e-mail?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:20 -0500
Bill Cole articulated:
{snip}
> I could be misunderstanding you, but I think that's wrong. The
> pkg-install script asks to modify mailer.conf but it does not modify
> mailwrapper itself.
Sorry, that is what I meant to say.
--
Jer
rapper if you give it permission to do
so; however, it will not do what you apparently accomplished. I am
wondering if you did not give the port permission to over write the
mailwrapper.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO
sendmail_outbound_enable="NO"
sendmail_submit_enable="NO"
postfix_enable="YES"
dovecot_enable="YES"
The dovecot line is only needed if using Dovecot. Otherwise it serves
no purpose.
If you install via ports, it will make most of the needed changes for
you. You wi
:
strict_mime_encoding_domain (default: no) (1)
(1) http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#strict_mime_encoding_domain
- --
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.htm
>
> What he said...
Personally, I have found NOT receiving mail from Google to be a plus.
In any case, the is a forum on SPAMCOP that is active. I have used it
in the past, although several years ago. I just checked and it is still
there. There is also information on possible configura
xactly what the problem
was, the cause not the effect, you would not be asking the question to
begin with. Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mai
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:16 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Berton articulated:
>
>
> This post might not that indirect belong to why this list does not
> use Return-Path. I ran a server ( not postfix) for many years, which
> ended up with too many mail was discrded or were taken to the side
> becouse I ha
included, although I am told that there is
support for it in some RFC. I would assume that Wietse would be the
best person to ask.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_REA
Postfix ports, please get in touch off-list.
Sahil, thanks for you excellent work on maintaining the port on
FreeBSD. I know what a chore it can be getting anything to work
correctly on that OS. With that said, I hope you are not considering
abandoning the port.
I could be of more
assistance to you if I actually knew what this "mail store server",
version, etcetera actually was. I fail to see the reason or logic behind
the secrecy.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPO
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:08:05 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
> Sahil Tandon:
> > FWIW, the FreeBSD Postfix port is patched so that post-install does
> > not add "inet_protocols=ipv4" to main.cf during upgrades. Instead,
> > users are notified[1] about the recent change of defaults, and
> >
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:34:37 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Berton articulated:
> Merry christmas to you all!
Have you ever considered the irony in the fact that we celebrate
Christ's birthday every year by ignoring the fact that he would have
celebrated Hanukkah?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibe
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
