On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:01:07 +0100 Erwan David articulated: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek > <ma...@fortech.cz> said: > > Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to > > postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying > > to From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both > > the list and the sender personaly. But why should I reply to the > > sender personaly? Could anyone here (Wietse?) setup this list with > > proper Reply to: header? Or is there any reason for this? > > > > Best regards, Tomas > > > > There 3 possible ways to answer : > to the poster, to the list, to all. > Setting the Reply-To: prevents the first possibility. > > Some MUAs have a "answer to list" command.
This is one of those topics that gets debated on various lists from time to time. From the dozen or so lists that I am associated with, it seems that the consensus is that if a message is posted to the list, it should be answered (replied-to) on list. Many posters, including myself, routinely discard mail sent directly to them from a poster on a mailing list. If a poster desired a personalized or directed response, they can so indicate in their post. You will notice that Sahil Tandon did just that in a recent post. Now, to answer you specific question, I don't know. I am not even sure why a "List-Id:" is not included, although I am told that there is support for it in some RFC. I would assume that Wietse would be the best person to ask. -- Jerry ✌ postfix-u...@seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html The light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train.
