Sorry. I meant ipv4 only, so an ipv6 only server cann't connect with the
mailinglists
Op 09-04-2025 om 08:06 schreef Florian Piekert via Postfix-users:
Hello,
I only see IPv4. Maybe DNS issue on your end?
root@sonne:~# host list.sys4.de
list.sys4.de has address 45.90.5.195
list.sys4.de mail i
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
> As for hosters, I find Hetzner's approach interesting: All their
> products come with a /64 IPv6 subnet included, while IPv4 addresses are
> an optional addon, billed separately.
JFTR: A month ago OVH went into a similar direction. In addition to an
'un
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:27:38PM CEST, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
said:
> On 4/9/25 10:59, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> >
> > i think all maillist servers is dual stacked by 2025, why is sys4.de an
> > exemption, hmm :=) (Linode.com can give it stable for 5 us $)
>
> You'd
* Erwan David via Postfix-users:
> I worked for hosting companies. One was technically ready to connect
> customers in IPv6, the other one had it on study. But in both we (the
> tech staff) were told "customers do not ask for it".
While not specifically Postfix-related, I think it is lamentable t
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:22:05PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> On 10.04.25 00:29, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > No, that's not always the case...
>
> now I'm curious how.
> maybe I missed something?
Yes, my reply to the second post by the OP in this t
On 4/9/25 11:34, Erwan David via Postfix-users wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:27:38PM CEST, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
said:
I have a small-business service from a major US internet carrier. They
offer no IP6 service. They have no *plans* to offer IP6 service. They have
no plans t
On 4/9/25 10:59, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
i think all maillist servers is dual stacked by 2025, why is sys4.de an
exemption, hmm :=) (Linode.com can give it stable for 5 us $)
You'd really think so, wouldn't you?
I have a small-business service from a major US internet carrier.
> On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still
> > waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject some
> > recipients or the entire message, and running milters *after* the
> > message is accept
Jack Raats via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-04-09 11:53:
Sorry. I meant ipv4 only, so an ipv6 only server cann't connect with
the mailinglists
ARC-Authentication-Results i=1; list.sys4.de; dkim=fail; arc=none
(Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=fail (Used From Domain Record)
header.from=jaraso
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 04:23:17PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > > You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still
> > > waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject
On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still
waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject some
recipients or the entire message, and running milters *after* the
message is accepted (a.k.a. "post-
On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still
waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject some
recipients or the entire message, and running milters *after* the
message is accepted (a.k.a. "post-
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Gioele Pannetto via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm configuring an inbound-only Postfix server and I have connected an
> antispam software using the milter interface of Postfix with the
> smtpd_milters propriety.
>
> Suppose I have a mailbox (u...@exampl
Hi,
I'm configuring an inbound-only Postfix server and I have connected an
antispam software using the milter interface of Postfix with the
smtpd_milters propriety.
Suppose I have a mailbox (u...@example.com) and an alias to that mailbox
(al...@example.com). In the virtual_mailbox_maps I have
On 2025-04-09 at 05:53:19 UTC-0400 (Wed, 9 Apr 2025 11:53:19 +0200)
Jack Raats via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Sorry. I meant ipv4 only, so an ipv6 only server cann't connect with
the mailinglists
An ipv6-only server cannot connect with a very large fraction of mail
systems. It is
Joan Moreau:
> >> # grep 5CD9C140C4F /var/log/mail/postfix.log
> >> Apr 8 00:51:04 gjserver postfix-ip1/26/smtpd[30239]: 5CD9C140C4F:
> >> client=ip1.grosjo.net[2a01:4f9:2a:85a::2]
> >> Apr 8 00:51:04 gjserver postfix-ip1/cleanup[25675]: 5CD9C140C4F:
> >> message-id=<110e084354427d95014f789693591
16 matches
Mail list logo