[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Jack Raats via Postfix-users
Sorry. I meant ipv4 only, so an ipv6 only server cann't connect with the mailinglists Op 09-04-2025 om 08:06 schreef Florian Piekert via Postfix-users: Hello, I only see IPv4. Maybe DNS issue on your end? root@sonne:~# host list.sys4.de list.sys4.de has address 45.90.5.195 list.sys4.de mail i

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote: > As for hosters, I find Hetzner's approach interesting: All their > products come with a /64 IPv6 subnet included, while IPv4 addresses are > an optional addon, billed separately. JFTR: A month ago OVH went into a similar direction. In addition to an 'un

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Erwan David via Postfix-users
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:27:38PM CEST, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users said: > On 4/9/25 10:59, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: > > > > i think all maillist servers is dual stacked by 2025, why is sys4.de an > > exemption, hmm :=) (Linode.com can give it stable for 5 us $) > > You'd

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
* Erwan David via Postfix-users: > I worked for hosting companies. One was technically ready to connect > customers in IPv6, the other one had it on study. But in both we (the > tech staff) were told "customers do not ask for it". While not specifically Postfix-related, I think it is lamentable t

[pfx] Re: Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:22:05PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: > On 10.04.25 00:29, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > > No, that's not always the case... > > now I'm curious how. > maybe I missed something? Yes, my reply to the second post by the OP in this t

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
On 4/9/25 11:34, Erwan David via Postfix-users wrote: On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:27:38PM CEST, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users said: I have a small-business service from a major US internet carrier. They offer no IP6 service. They have no *plans* to offer IP6 service. They have no plans t

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
On 4/9/25 10:59, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: i think all maillist servers is dual stacked by 2025, why is sys4.de an exemption, hmm :=) (Linode.com can give it stable for 5 us $) You'd really think so, wouldn't you? I have a small-business service from a major US internet carrier.

[pfx] Re: Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > > You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still > > waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject some > > recipients or the entire message, and running milters *after* the > > message is accept

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Jack Raats via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-04-09 11:53: Sorry. I meant ipv4 only, so an ipv6 only server cann't connect with the mailinglists ARC-Authentication-Results i=1; list.sys4.de; dkim=fail; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=fail (Used From Domain Record) header.from=jaraso

[pfx] Re: Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 04:23:17PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: > > On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > > > You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still > > > waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject

[pfx] Re: Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject some recipients or the entire message, and running milters *after* the message is accepted (a.k.a. "post-

[pfx] Re: Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Gioele Pannetto via Postfix-users
On 09/04/25 15:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: You have a choice between running milters while the SMTP client is still waiting for a response, and therefore being able to reject some recipients or the entire message, and running milters *after* the message is accepted (a.k.a. "post-

[pfx] Re: Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Gioele Pannetto via Postfix-users wrote: > Hi, > I'm configuring an inbound-only Postfix server and I have connected an > antispam software using the milter interface of Postfix with the > smtpd_milters propriety. > > Suppose I have a mailbox (u...@exampl

[pfx] Virtual alias expansion in milter

2025-04-09 Thread Gioele Pannetto via Postfix-users
Hi, I'm configuring an inbound-only Postfix server and I have connected an antispam software using the milter interface of Postfix with the smtpd_milters propriety. Suppose I have a mailbox (u...@example.com) and an alias to that mailbox (al...@example.com). In the virtual_mailbox_maps I have

[pfx] Re: list.sys4.de

2025-04-09 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2025-04-09 at 05:53:19 UTC-0400 (Wed, 9 Apr 2025 11:53:19 +0200) Jack Raats via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: Sorry. I meant ipv4 only, so an ipv6 only server cann't connect with the mailinglists An ipv6-only server cannot connect with a very large fraction of mail systems. It is

[pfx] Re: Sending form a subdomain

2025-04-09 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Joan Moreau: > >> # grep 5CD9C140C4F /var/log/mail/postfix.log > >> Apr 8 00:51:04 gjserver postfix-ip1/26/smtpd[30239]: 5CD9C140C4F: > >> client=ip1.grosjo.net[2a01:4f9:2a:85a::2] > >> Apr 8 00:51:04 gjserver postfix-ip1/cleanup[25675]: 5CD9C140C4F: > >> message-id=<110e084354427d95014f789693591