On 9/24/2012 3:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> I'm running 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 as a mail relay; most of my mail is
>> delivered to an internal Exchange 2010 environment with two Hub
>> Transport machines clustered behind Windows NLB under the same
>> hostname.
>
> We have the same setup, but wi
I need to configure a existing mail server to accept mail for another domain
until their server is replaced.
I'm currently using postfix-2.2.9-10.18, which I know is old.
Is it necessary to update the postfix first?
Thanks
Jon L Miller
m (intl):+61 0412 126 166
m (aus): 0412 126 166
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:15AM +0200, Michael Storz wrote:
> >This is an account provisioning problem, not an MTA routing problem.
> >The best solution is to not send email to the user until the
> >provisioning is complete.
>
> Unfortunately we can't tackle the account provisioning problem
>
On 9/24/2012 5:19 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I would like to know what is the simplest way to do the following:
>
> Assuming my server is an MTA for domain example.net with local
> delivery to mostly virtual users. Virtual user addresses look like
> virtu...@example.net. These users often get em
On 9/24/2012 3:03 PM, Aaron Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m running 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 as a mail relay; most of my mail is
> delivered to an internal Exchange 2010 environment with two Hub
> Transport machines clustered behind Windows NLB under the same
> hostname.
>
>
>
> I’m seeing spora
I would like to know what is the simplest way to do the following:
Assuming my server is an MTA for domain example.net with local delivery
to mostly virtual users. Virtual user addresses look like
virtu...@example.net. These users often get emails from the example.org
domain.
Email received
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:26:05PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> DN Singh skrev den 24-09-2012 18:31:
> >You can setup multiple postfix instances for each ip.
>
> and one postfix have no problem have seperate listner pr ip
That's not the issue. The issue is that in a single instance, it
isn't s
Jack S wrote:
Hello All,
Does anyone know of a reporting tool which allows you to search email
logs and show the results in a web interface?
I see that cpanel has a pretty nice one showing success and failure
along with details of the delivery in a very simple clean interface.
rsyslog (http:
Jack S skrev den 24-09-2012 23:19:
Hello All,
Does anyone know of a reporting tool which allows you to search email
logs and show the results in a web interface?
ulogd, then make a webpage that uses sql
or syslogd-ng where it logs direct to sql
I see that cpanel has a pretty nice one showin
Hello All,
Does anyone know of a reporting tool which allows you to search email
logs and show the results in a web interface?
I see that cpanel has a pretty nice one showing success and failure
along with details of the delivery in a very simple clean interface.
--
Thanks!
Joey
Nick Rosier:
> proxy:pgsql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/sql/virtual_alias_maps.cf
>
> virtual_alias_maps.cf:
> user =
> password =
> hosts = db.domain.tld
> #hosts = [2001:xxx:xxx:xxx]
> dbname = postfix
Postfix passes the host directly to the PQsetdbLogin() function. I suppose
that the Postgresql do
Wietse Venema wrote:
Nick Rosier:
Hi,
I have Postfix configured to query some maps (proxy:pgsql) on my
Postgresql-server which is only accessible through IPv6. Occasionally
I see following errors:
postfix/smtp: warning: connect to pgsql server db.domain.tld: could
not translate host name "db.d
Nick Rosier:
> Hi,
>
> I have Postfix configured to query some maps (proxy:pgsql) on my
> Postgresql-server which is only accessible through IPv6. Occasionally
> I see following errors:
>
> postfix/smtp: warning: connect to pgsql server db.domain.tld: could
> not translate host name "db.domain.tld
> I'm running 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 as a mail relay; most of my mail is
> delivered to an internal Exchange 2010 environment with two Hub
> Transport machines clustered behind Windows NLB under the same
> hostname.
We have the same setup, but with a more recent postfix and OS.
Shouldn't matter that m
DN Singh skrev den 24-09-2012 18:31:
You can setup multiple postfix instances for each ip.
and one postfix have no problem have seperate listner pr ip
Hi,
I have Postfix configured to query some maps (proxy:pgsql) on my
Postgresql-server which is only accessible through IPv6. Occasionally I see
following errors:
postfix/smtp: warning: connect to pgsql server db.domain.tld: could not translate host
name "db.domain.tld" to address: hostname n
* Aaron Bennett :
> Sep 24 11:58:01 megalon.clarku.edu postfix/qmgr[28063]: BA1362E778B:
> to=, relay=none, delay=0.06,
> delays=0.05/0/0/0, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (delivery temporarily
> suspended: lost connection with exchange.clarku.edu[140.232.254.129]
> while receiving the initial server
Hi,
I'm running 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 as a mail relay; most of my mail is delivered to
an internal Exchange 2010 environment with two Hub Transport machines clustered
behind Windows NLB under the same hostname.
I'm seeing sporadic - and by sporadic I mean two or three intervals per month -
when al
V?clav Pernica:
>
> wietse:
>
> > Specify:
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > virtual_mailbox_maps = tcp:host:port
>
>
> Thanks! This would be really elegant and easy solution. However
> the server is running on RHEL 6.3 where the TCP_Tables are not
> supported. Is there some easy way how t
wietse:
> Specify:
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> virtual_mailbox_maps = tcp:host:port
Thanks! This would be really elegant and easy solution. However the server is
running on RHEL 6.3 where the TCP_Tables are not supported. Is there some easy
way how to allow this functionality?
I tested
Ok, It might need to deliver to the local machine, but the MX will be
one of the other three ip's, this specific ip will solely be used as
relay host for our web platform. I'll give this a try tomorrow.
Thanks.
Marc van Duivenvoorde
Kingsquare information services.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:41 P
Michael Storz:
> seems I was
> not able to show the underlying problem, let me rephrase my problem:
>
> How can I configure arbitrarily complex if-then-else constructs
> for every possible table type?
You will have to outsource that logic with tcp_table lookups.
Considering tha
Kingsquare.nl - Marc van Duivenvoorde:
> Hi, I've got a question. Let's say I have a machine with 4 ipnumbers,
> all of which are being used to send e-mail. Is it possible to enforce
> that whenever someone connects to smtp on one of these numbers, that
> the smtpd will use the same ip?
>
> I have
On 9/24/2012 11:04 AM, Kingsquare.nl - Marc van Duivenvoorde wrote:
> Hi, I've got a question. Let's say I have a machine with 4 ipnumbers,
> all of which are being used to send e-mail. Is it possible to enforce
> that whenever someone connects to smtp on one of these numbers, that
> the smtpd will
You can setup multiple postfix instances for each ip.
On Sep 24, 2012 9:34 PM, "Kingsquare.nl - Marc van Duivenvoorde" <
m...@kingsquare.nl> wrote:
> Hi, I've got a question. Let's say I have a machine with 4 ipnumbers,
> all of which are being used to send e-mail. Is it possible to enforce
> that
On 9/24/2012 10:56 AM, Simon Effenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have problems that Postfix is crying about "warning: Illegal address
> syntax" for mails like:
>
> -b...@blub.org
>
> and i'm not sure if this is correct.. in the source code (it's quite
> old but also a newer postfix (2.7) shows this) t
Hi, I've got a question. Let's say I have a machine with 4 ipnumbers,
all of which are being used to send e-mail. Is it possible to enforce
that whenever someone connects to smtp on one of these numbers, that
the smtpd will use the same ip?
I have a shared machine, only for one mail account I use
Am 2012-09-19 22:27, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Michael Storz:
The consistency check requires that a user object is first
(correctly)
defined in OpenLDAP. Only then the second check looks for the
correct
definition in Active Directory. If it is not then we defer the email
(we
...
If a new user i
Hi,
we have problems that Postfix is crying about "warning: Illegal address
syntax" for mails like:
-b...@blub.org
and i'm not sure if this is correct.. in the source code (it's quite
old but also a newer postfix (2.7) shows this) there is a strict_rfc821
but i'm not sure if this one is what i'm
V?clav Pernica:
> The idea is redirect the inbound mail into scrip which check if
> user exists in oracle, then determine the path from user ID and
> export it eg. like environmental variable. Such message could be
Specify:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
virtual_mailbox_maps = tcp:host:port
where you
Hello
Is there any way how can I specify the mail directory location for virtual user
via eg. environmental variable? I cannot use lookup tables because the user
information are stored in Oracle DB
The mails are delivered to user ID which looks like C. Where C is a
character [a-zA-Z] a
k p:
> Hello,
>
> what is the rule of commenting out the lines in master.cf?
man 5 master
also on-line as
http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
Wietse
Tobias Kirchhofer:
> Am 23.09.12 17:02, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > tob...@kirchhofer.net:
> > [ Charset ISO-8859-15 unsupported, converting... ]
> >> Hello, this is my first post in this very valuable list.
> >>
> >> I am running successfully a postfix-sasl-cyrus-setup with virtual
> >> domains. So
Hello,
what is the rule of commenting out the lines in master.cf?
in master.cf lines starting with # comments are ignored , right?
what about if the next line is indented (staring with space)
I assume in the following sample only the commented line is ignored and -o
cleanup... is considered a
Am 23.09.12 17:02, schrieb Wietse Venema:
tob...@kirchhofer.net:
[ Charset ISO-8859-15 unsupported, converting... ]
Hello, this is my first post in this very valuable list.
I am running successfully a postfix-sasl-cyrus-setup with virtual
domains. Some recipients of the virtual domain example.c
we...@zackbummfertig.de:
>
> hello,
>
> i just ask myself , is it useful to set reject_unauth_pipelining in
> "smtpd_recipient_restrictions"?
> my thought was, its used only in DATA_restrictions.
> am i on wrong way?
Before Postfix 2.6 or so, pipelinine detection didn't work well
before the DAT
On 23.09.2012 21:51, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Hello,
>> - try to block as much spam as possible before forwarding (in our case
>> that would mean RBL and pre-queue filters, as we are not allowed to drop
>> mail we successfully received)
> I think you already have some sort of spam filtering in pla
hello,
i just ask myself , is it useful to set reject_unauth_pipelining in
"smtpd_recipient_restrictions"?
my thought was, its used only in DATA_restrictions.
am i on wrong way?
thanks for any help or explanations
m,arko
38 matches
Mail list logo
