On 15/03/2012 13:01, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
DTNX/NGMX Postmaster wrote:
I don't know about Android, but we have not seen any issues with the
iPhone/iPad. Works fine with TLS 'encrypt' in our setups, as suggested
above.
In my experience, both the manufacturer provided and added mail clients
Nikolaos Milas:
> > If you just copy old config files over a new Postfix installation
> > then you will end up with a broken system.
>
> Hmm, could you please provide some more details on it? Why so? I would
> imagine that a full set of master.cf, main.cf and any other files used
> therein (hash
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 03/14/2012 04:19 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm currently running a pretty basic high-availability configuration
for our mail server (postfix) - it simply runs in a Xen virtual
machine, with mirrored disks across two machines (DRBD), and failover
of the VM i
On 03/12/2012 06:05 PM, Janne H wrote:
Hello.
I've setup a null client (from the postfix doc) to use a sender rewrite with
sender_canonical_maps to send mail from serv...@foo.bar through a mailgateway.
And before finishing of the mailgateway config, I got a bounce back. So how can
I fix the n
On 03/14/2012 04:19 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm currently running a pretty basic high-availability configuration
for our mail server (postfix) - it simply runs in a Xen virtual
machine, with mirrored disks across two machines (DRBD), and failover
of the VM if something goes wrong
On 15/3/2012 7:56 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So, I guess that if I upgrade using an RPM (through "rpm -Uvh"), as I
described, the upgrade is expected to be successful too?
I would like to also clarify that the system shows:
# rpm -qa | grep postfix
postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
because the s
On 15/3/2012 4:01 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
Instead, use "make upgrade" which updates main.cf and master.cf
to maintain compatibility with the earlier version.
Thank you Wietse.
That's how I've been upgrading until now (using "make upgrade"). But now
I want to switch from source-compilation t
Ben Rosengart wrote:
What is the best Perl interface for milters? I found several:
Sendmail::Milter is way old, and demands "-Dusethreads" -- my perl is
built with "-Duseithreads".
Sendmail::Pmilter is recent, but lacks a maintainer. No traffic on
its mailing list since 2009.
Nikolaos Milas:
> Is there a way to completely uninstall this version?
That would be a mistake - you'd lose your configuration.
Instead, use "make upgrade" which updates main.cf and master.cf
to maintain compatibility with the earlier version.
If you just copy old config files over a new Postfix
On 15/3/2012 12:46 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Now I'll have to setup an installation to test everything and confirm
correct software operation.
I would like to test the new RPMs on a server (CentOS 5.8 x86_64) where
there is already a Postfix v2.8.2 built from source (following
directions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
DTNX/NGMX Postmaster wrote:
>I don't know about Android, but we have not seen any issues with the
>iPhone/iPad. Works fine with TLS 'encrypt' in our setups, as suggested
>above.
In my experience, both the manufacturer provided and added mail clie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
SamLT wrote:
>Sorry for the OT, but does s_client even works with IPv6? I've never
>found how?
In my experience, limited to bare IPv6 addresses, it does not.
- --
Victoriano Giralt
Enviado desde el movil / Sent from mobile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
On Mar 14, 2012, at 21:03, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Charles Marcus :
>> On 2012-03-14 2:39 PM, Ed W wrote:
>>> I see no reason to *require* encryption on the submission port (RFC
>>> aside).
>>
>> Unless you prefer that sniffers not be able to see your passwords
>> crossing the wire in pla
On Mar 14, 2012, at 19:39, Ed W wrote:
> On 13/03/2012 23:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> #submission inet n - n - - smtpd
>> # -o syslog_name=postfix/submission
>> # -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>
> I forget the exact details now, but one mail client, I think i
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:44:33AM +0100, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> Victoriano Giralt wrote:
>
> >And I have found that gnutls-climate is better for testing IPv6
> >servers.
> Stupid autocorrection, I meant gnutls-cli
Sorry for the OT
On 15/3/2012 3:14 πμ, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Does your /etc/ld.so.conf contain the
appropriate paths, and is your hints file up to date?
Thank you Sahil,
Your hint gave me a solution:
I found that there was no ld path configured for these libraries.
I created a file: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/openldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Victoriano Giralt wrote:
>And I have found that gnutls-climate is better for testing IPv6
>servers.
Stupid autocorrection, I meant gnutls-cli
- --
Victoriano Giralt
Enviado desde el movil / Sent from mobile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ulrich Zehl wrote:
>For basic testing, I tend to use "gnutls-cli --starttls", where it
>starts a
>plain text session, and only begins TLS negotiation when you send it
>EOF
>(or SIGALRM, but ^D has always been easy enough for me).
>As far as I kno
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:52:54PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Yes, I would always choose telnet first. Unfortunately, if you want
> to test an encrypted session telnet fails miserably.
>
> The [press R to renegotiate] behavior of s_client is documented and,
> last time I looked, can't be disabled
19 matches
Mail list logo
