Victor Duchovni put forth on 11/23/2010 11:05 PM:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:04:47PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing the
>> latency is actually higher when smtpd queries proxymap than when timing
>> postmap -q. Is this the case?
>
> Not necessarily, it depends on how memory-const
> "My general advice WRT to VPS/colo/hosting outfits such as Softlayer,
> Limestone, Sharktech, Hostnoc, Colocation America, Colo4, SingleHop,
> Liquid Web, ServePath, GigeNet, WholeSale Internet, FDCservers,
> CarolinaNet, Hurricane Electric, et al is to SMTP block their entire IP
> space and then
Gary Smith put forth on 11/23/2010 2:17 PM:
> I've been using the same IP's for years but I'm moving all my equipment to a
> new facility in the coming days. Is there a checklist of things that you
> guys suggest when setting up mail servers on a brand new range?
>
> I'm expecting to setup 5 IP
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:04:47PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I'm guessing the
> latency is actually higher when smtpd queries proxymap than when timing
> postmap -q. Is this the case?
Not necessarily, it depends on how memory-constrained your system is.
Paging in a large table in a large num
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/23/2010 6:57 PM:
> Victor Duchovni:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Would you please give us the run down on why these map types (an
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would you please give us the run down on why these map types (and maybe
> > > > others) shouldn't be used wit
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >
> > > Would you please give us the run down on why these map types (and maybe
> > > others) shouldn't be used with proxymap due to performance r
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > Would you please give us the run down on why these map types (and maybe
> > others) shouldn't be used with proxymap due to performance reasons? You
> > mentioned something about this long ago but I can't seem
* Gary Smith :
> I've been using the same IP's for years but I'm moving all my equipment to a
> new facility in the coming days. Is there a checklist of things that you
> guys suggest when setting up mail servers on a brand new range?
Get a reputation for your domain i.e. DKIM et al. If you don't
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Would you please give us the run down on why these map types (and maybe
> others) shouldn't be used with proxymap due to performance reasons? You
> mentioned something about this long ago but I can't seem to locate that
> email in m
Victor,
Would you please give us the run down on why these map types (and maybe
others) shouldn't be used with proxymap due to performance reasons? You
mentioned something about this long ago but I can't seem to locate that
email in my archives. IIRC you didn't go into much technical detail as
t
An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.7.2.html
The stable release Postfix 2.7.2 addresses the defects described
below. These defects are also addressed in the legacy releases
that are still maintained.
Note: Postfix 2.3 and ea
Le 23/11/2010 22:28, Gary Smith a écrit :
you can try a lookup of these IPs in multiple RBLs, and lookup the
"surrounding subnet" (/24 for example) on:
http://www.senderbase.org/
you may want to keep the old servers for some time.
(from experience, I've found MS to "cache" reputation for
> For receiving emails, you don't have too much to worry about. Just make
> sure to set your DNS TTL pretty low a few days before you make the
> actual switch.
Yeah, that's the easy part. In the process of modifying TTL's as we speak.
For my clients I have a backup MX that uses the same rules a
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>
> Makes sense. I will keep a set of MX servers at the original COLO setup to
> accept emails from my new range and forward outgoing email through them until
> we verify the new one.
>
> Gary Smith
For receiving emails, you don't have too much
> you can try a lookup of these IPs in multiple RBLs, and lookup the
> "surrounding subnet" (/24 for example) on:
> http://www.senderbase.org/
>
> you may want to keep the old servers for some time.
> (from experience, I've found MS to "cache" reputation for a long long
> time. That once for
Le 23/11/2010 21:19, Andrew Beverley a écrit :
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:21 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
There is nothing significant wrong with your config -- postfix
is working correctly and performing the queries required.
My only suggestion is to be careful what you put in the
"access" table und
Le 23/11/2010 21:17, Gary Smith a écrit :
I've been using the same IP's for years but I'm moving all my equipment to a
new facility in the coming days. Is there a checklist of things that you guys
suggest when setting up mail servers on a brand new range?
I'm expecting to setup 5 IP's for out
> > I'm expecting to setup 5 IP's for outgoing email and as such the RNDS
> records for them as well. I just want to make sure that there's little,
> if any, problems for myself and my customers that use my services.
>
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> You'll probably want to warm up those IPs first. Generally
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
> I'm expecting to setup 5 IP's for outgoing email and as such the RNDS records
> for them as well. I just want to make sure that there's little, if any,
> problems for myself and my customers that use my services.
Hi Gary,
You'll probably want
On 11/23/2010 2:16 PM, CT wrote:
I accidentally replied to a thread instead of starting my
own..oops..
Postfix Version: postfix-2.5.1-1.rhel5
I have an internal relay with an external NAT.
The internal relay is not visible to the outside..
The receiving destination gives the error:
There i
I've been using the same IP's for years but I'm moving all my equipment to a
new facility in the coming days. Is there a checklist of things that you guys
suggest when setting up mail servers on a brand new range?
I'm expecting to setup 5 IP's for outgoing email and as such the RNDS records
fo
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:22 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:53:44PM +, Andrew Beverley wrote:
>
> > > Note, that the above applies also to "bare" domain queries, so tables
> > > with "domain =" constraints cannot be used to store the list of
> > > virtual_alias_domai
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:21 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:50 -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
> >>>
I accidentally replied to a thread instead of starting my own..oops..
Postfix Version: postfix-2.5.1-1.rhel5
I have an internal relay with an external NAT.
The internal relay is not visible to the outside..
The receiving destination gives the error:
--
550 [PERMFAIL] xxx.xxx.net requires valid
Postfix Version: postfix-2.5.1-1.rhel5
I have an internal relay with an external NAT.
The internal relay is not visible to the outside..
The receiving destination gives the error:
--
550 [PERMFAIL] xxx.xxx.net requires valid sender domain (in reply to
RCPT TO command))
--
My question
What is t
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:53:44PM +, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > Note, that the above applies also to "bare" domain queries, so tables
> > with "domain =" constraints cannot be used to store the list of
> > virtual_alias_domains, virtual_mailbox_domains, ... Not a problem,
> > since after hard
On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:50 -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
virtual_alias_maps mysql database query for every email that it is
processing, eve
Yes, now I use address extensions for this task. But all users, who are not
very friendly with computers, such as managers, has a lot of problems with
it. They can't understand extensions. There must be only one constant email
for each user without any variable extensions, or you will have a lot of
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:58:34 mouss wrote:
> Le 22/11/2010 08:55, J. Roeleveld a écrit :
> > [snip]
> >
> > There is only 1 email address causing issues, eg. am only rewriting that
> > specific one.
>
> if so, then simply use
>
> u...@lists_example_orgu...@lists-example.or
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 17:13 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:50:21PM -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
>
> > On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
> >> virtual_alias_maps mysql database query
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:50 -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
> On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
> > virtual_alias_maps mysql database query for every email that it is
> > processing, even if the domain is not listed
On 11/23/2010 5:54 AM, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
Hi,
is there any way for postfix to change the outgoing relayhost
using a sort of policy server?
Postfix doesn't directly support that, although there may be
workarounds for some situations. What information will you
use to determine the relayhos
Le 22/11/2010 08:55, J. Roeleveld a écrit :
[snip]
There is only 1 email address causing issues, eg. am only rewriting that
specific one.
if so, then simply use
u...@lists_example_org u...@lists-example.org
better reject the address and let the sender fix his ratware...
That is
Le 22/11/2010 20:04, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
Carlos,
I use a badaddr file that lists domains from whom I will not accept
messages. The content looks like these:
hostforreal.com 550 Rejected domain D23
nasty-mailin
> The task: if mail has some passphrase in subject (eg [passme]),
> then do not apply greylistnig, RBL etc and transfer a mail to LDA.
If you whitelist based on a string in the message, then why not
whitelist based on a string in the RECIPIENT ADDRESS? Postfix
supports address extensions, like thi
Thanks! I've read it but I still can't understand how to combine content
check and SMTP headers check. The task: if mail has some passphrase in
subject (eg [passme]), then do not apply greylistnig, RBL etc and transfer a
mail to LDA. If doesn't contain passphrase then check greylisting etc in a
usu
> I need to check letter's heading (subject) and if subject doesn't contain
> some passphrase check this letter with greylisting or rbl. I can't
> understand how can I solve such problem with postfix. My server should check
To inspect (and reject) content during the SMTP DATA command, see:
http://
Chris G:
> I have a mail sent across my LAN (from postfix to postfix) whose headers
> start as follows:-
>
> From r...@zbmc.eu Tue Nov 23 08: 2:13 2010
Please verify that this line is from Postfix and not from procmail
or some other software.
In the case of Postfix, the time+date stamp is p
I need to check letter's heading (subject) and if subject doesn't contain
some passphrase check this letter with greylisting or rbl. I can't
understand how can I solve such problem with postfix. My server should check
all smtpd_*_restrictions for SMTP headers, then start to receive data and if
data
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:42:11AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 6:00 AM, Chris G wrote:
> >Currently my mydestination line looks like:-
> >
> > zbmc.eu, dps.zbmc.eu, localhost
> >
> >This is on the mail server which receives E-Mail from the 'outside
> >world' from whose point of vie
On 11/23/2010 6:00 AM, Chris G wrote:
Currently my mydestination line looks like:-
zbmc.eu, dps.zbmc.eu, localhost
This is on the mail server which receives E-Mail from the 'outside
world' from whose point of view my system is zbmc.eu. Is the
dps.zbmc.eu entry actually necessary or will m
Currently my mydestination line looks like:-
zbmc.eu, dps.zbmc.eu, localhost
This is on the mail server which receives E-Mail from the 'outside
world' from whose point of view my system is zbmc.eu. Is the
dps.zbmc.eu entry actually necessary or will mail for dps.zbmc.eu be
accepted anyway be
Hi,
is there any way for postfix to change the outgoing relayhost using a
sort of policy server?
So far I've seen in the docs it's possible to change the relay host
using a sender dependant map, but it would be a static approach, not a
dynamic one.
One idea that pops up in my mind is using
I have a mail sent across my LAN (from postfix to postfix) whose headers
start as follows:-
From r...@zbmc.eu Tue Nov 23 08: 2:13 2010
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: root
Delivered-To: r...@zbmc.eu
Received: by mws.zbmc.eu (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 1282856013B; Tue
45 matches
Mail list logo
