On one of my servers (postfix 2.7) I need to do verp in such a way that
I need to add recipient-id to envelope sender
so if sender is r...@senderdomain.tld -->ram-1...@senderdomain.tld
is the numeric id of the recipient.
Also I need to do VERP always , irrespective of whether the client se
On one of my servers (postfix 2.7) I need to do verp in such a way that
I need to add recipient-id to envelope sender
so if sender is r...@senderdomain.tld -->ram-1...@senderdomain.tld
is the numeric id of the recipient.
Also I need to do VERP always , irrespective of whether the client s
Steve Jenkins put forth on 10/19/2010 11:12 PM:
> Stan Hoeppner said:
>> This will probably be a big help to Steve.
>
> Thanks, Stan. That fqrdns.pcre file rocks. Is that something you created?
> May I share the link with others?
Glad it's working well for you. That file was donated to me via an
Jeroen Geilman said:
Make sure you understand the difference between
smtpd_reject_unknown_helo_hostname and
smtpd_reject_unknown_[reverse_]client_hostname.
Ok - here's what I understand them each to be:
-reject_unknown_helo_hostname will reject a request if the remote
mail server does
Hello,
My guess is that this is an easy question but I am not sure.
I would like for the client to have the ability to forward email BUT I also
need to keep a copy of that message. So, I have the following template that
I believe can work for an alias file for an LDAP setup:
server_host = [LDAP
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 06:12 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>
>> Not if the students subdomain has different MX details to the main
>> domain, which appears to be the case here:
>>
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> wesleyseminary.edu. 43098 IN MX 10
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * Christopher Koeber :
>
> > inet_interfaces = all
> default
>
> > mydomain = students.wesleyseminary.edu
> > myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
>
> I'd say myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
> wh
Le 19/10/2010 21:22, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:37:18PM +0200, mouss wrote:
- get the MAIL FROM address from the "Return-Path" header. with this you
can do: sendmail -f $returnpath yourdestinationemail
Make that:
sendmail -i -f "$returnpath" -- "$destpath"<
Le 20/10/2010 21:04, John Watson a écrit :
Hello,
I am using postfix in conjunction with squirrelmail to build a
business application. One of the requirements that I have is that when
an email is received in one of the postfix mail boxes an alert is
generated. In our case we will be sendin
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:37 PM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 19.10.2010 19:42, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:17:23PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, I am running postfix 2.5.4 and would like to upgrade it
On 10/20/2010 09:04 PM, John Watson wrote:
Hello,
I am using postfix in conjunction with squirrelmail to build a
business application. One of the requirements that I have is that when
an email is received in one of the postfix mail boxes an alert is
generated. In our case we will be sending
Hello,
I am using postfix in conjunction with squirrelmail to build a business
application. One of the requirements that I have is that when an email is
received in one of the postfix mail boxes an alert is generated. In our case
we will be sending a standard message to another email but in gener
On 10/19/2010 11:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 10/19/2010 8:09 PM:
You're missing some of the better spam prevention methods here, such as
decent HELO checks, and an RBL or two.
I'd suggest at least adding reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname in
there, as well as (t
On 20/10/10 18:43, Mark Scholten wrote:
I'd like to get some script to process logfiles and gives back the following
information:
- From (address)
- From server (hostname and/or IP)
- Destination (address)
- Destination server (hostname and/or IP)
- Message ID
- Time and date (for the receiving
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:55 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Logfile condenser
>
> what I'd like to see is "requirements/needs". that is:
fake...@fakessh.eu:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Le 20.10.2010 14:54, Brian Evans - Postfix List a ?crit :
> > On 10/19/2010 9:15 PM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
> >> hello postfix network
> >> hello wieste
> >> hello guru of postfix
> >>
>
> I solved my problem of milter
> what are the habits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 20.10.2010 14:54, Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
> On 10/19/2010 9:15 PM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
>> hello postfix network
>> hello wieste
>> hello guru of postfix
>>
I solved my problem of milter
what are the habits and customs to the mai
On 10/19/2010 9:15 PM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
hello postfix network
hello wieste
hello guru of postfix
I did not follow the ads but the version 2.6.5 causes changes in mail.cf
and master.cf you can enlighten me on my postconf-n
What changes have been put in main.cf for postfix 2.6.5
I encoun
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:38:11 -0600
Steve Jenkins articulated:
> smtpd_use_tls = yes
This is deprecated. Please see:
http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_security_level
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REP
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 08:19 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> You can use their product if you like, but if you value security and
> privacy you won't. I can't fathom why anyone would trust their
> private data to a data mining company. I just don't get it. Nothing
> is free.
I don't know why so m
You can use their product if you like, but if you value security and
privacy you won't. I can't fathom why anyone would trust their private
data to a data mining company. I just don't get it. Nothing is free.
If you want to scale MTA, then run clusters with load balancers. Its
how they d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 20.10.2010 10:39, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> Le 20.10.2010 03:15, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
>> hello postfix network
>> hello wieste
>> hello guru of postfix
>
>> I did not follow the ads but the version 2.6.5 causes changes in mail.cf
>> an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 20.10.2010 03:15, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> hello postfix network
> hello wieste
> hello guru of postfix
>
> I did not follow the ads but the version 2.6.5 causes changes in mail.cf
> and master.cf you can enlighten me on my postconf-n
> What
On 19/10/10 19:42, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
"timestamp - client IP [hostname] - orig_envelope_from >
orig_envelope_to - Queue ID - final_envelope_from > final_envelope_to -
transport:nexthop - server IP [hostname] - delays"
You have a copy of the script now, of course, but if you or anybody
else
On 10/20/2010 09:45 AM, Dom Latter wrote:
On 20/10/10 05:26, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
How to scale for milions acounts, how do they do it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MapReduce may interest you.
...or not, if he's not a mathematician (which is likely) :P
--
J.
On 20/10/10 05:26, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
How to scale for milions acounts, how do they do it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MapReduce may interest you.
On 10/20/2010 05:26 AM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi!
I wonder know what system Gmail use. They use postfix as mta? I dont
think so...
How to scale for milions acounts, how do they do it?
Pretty much the same way they scale for billions of queries per day.
They have a massive infrast
On 10/20/2010 05:41 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Jeroen said:
My personal server uses:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_desti
On 10/19/2010 9:17 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Forcing everyone to just check their mail with POP/IMAP was actually what I
was going to resort to if I couldn't figure out a way to do this with just
Postfix config settings. It seems that unless I want to manage a SPAM filter
on
29 matches
Mail list logo
