Actually it is not happen only on xyz user. although size of the mailbox is
8mb. FYI, if i stop dovecot service and run *postfix flush* then all mails
are successfully send to the mailbox. after that i need to start dovecot
service.
Regards-
Mehsbah
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Bas Mevissen
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:05:32PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > My sincerest of thanks for providing both a solution and information about
> > OpenBSD semantics of which I was not aware.
>
> It's no different with Linux, Solaris, and so on.
>
> The loopback MTU is usually large to improve per
Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss:
> Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
see, none
Am 22.03.2010 22:36, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
> [snip]
1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/
>>>
>>> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a
>>> line for each mailbox in the databas
Aleksey Chudov a écrit :
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I have few email servers that send only email notifications to our
> customers with “Return-Path:” and “From:” none@.
>
> If email message cannot be delivered to customer, it must be silently
> discarded without non-delivery report to sender.
>
> Is t
Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
> Hi Reinaldo,
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could
Dave Green:
> > Another possible test:
> >
> > #ifconfig lo0 mtu 1500
> >
> > That should decide any argument about write buffer sizes.
>
> Was about to start with tcpdump, but changing the mtu resolves the issue
> entirely, confirming your earlier thoughts. There is now no significant
> delay
> Another possible test:
>
> #ifconfig lo0 mtu 1500
>
> That should decide any argument about write buffer sizes.
Was about to start with tcpdump, but changing the mtu resolves the issue
entirely, confirming your earlier thoughts. There is now no significant
delay for mail submitted with large
On 03/22/2010 03:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This is for a problem that Stephen Warren reported half a year ago
> that he ran into with pymilter-0.9.3, and that gave trouble with
> SMFIC_HEADER.
Ah, right. We can try that change, but I'm not optimistic that that will
help this problem. I'm fai
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
[snip]
>>> 1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/
>>
>> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a
>> line for each mailbox in the database and that's inviable for my
>> setup.
>>
[snip]
>
> Hi i d
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/19/2010 04:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > In the mean time, it would help if you could provide verbose (smtpd
> > AND cleanup) logging for a failed session. Please include information
>
> We're trying to get the logging information. Versions we've seen this on
> inclu
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:08:31PM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> On 22-3-10 22:06 , Richard van den Berg wrote:
>> Apparently postfix does not call SSL_library_init() /
>> OpenSSL_add_ssl_algorithms(), see
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573748 and
>> http://marc.info
Am 22.03.2010 21:53, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 22.03.2010 20:05, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Alternative to that patch? I did some searches
On 22-3-10 22:06 , Richard van den Berg wrote:
Apparently postfix does not call SSL_library_init() /
OpenSSL_add_ssl_algorithms(), see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573748 and
http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=126925010314573&w=2
Correction: postfix doesn't call OpenSSL_add
On 15-3-10 16:49 , Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
We use self-signed certs with Postfix, and StartTLS on port 25 works just
fine. Postfix is linked against OpenSSL 0.9.8m for us.
Is the signature algorithm of your cert sha256WithRSAEncryption ? It
looks like there is a bug in postfix where th
Am 22.03.2010 20:05, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
> Hi Reinaldo,
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>>
>>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>>> see, none of the alternatives
On 03/19/2010 04:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> In the mean time, it would help if you could provide verbose (smtpd
> AND cleanup) logging for a failed session. Please include information
We're trying to get the logging information. Versions we've seen this on
include:
postfix-2.5.9
postfix
Hi again all.
Been a while. Anyway, today I think I am trying to do something similar to
what Bob Eastbrook was discussing in late December. Here is what he said back
then:
> Forgive me if this is a FAQ, but I've looked all over and I don't see it
> addressed.
>
> I have a wildcard MX recor
Hi Reinaldo,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>
>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the
>> message in SMTP. I
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:57:42AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Another possible test:
>
> #ifconfig lo0 mtu 1500
>
> That should decide any argument about write buffer sizes.
Has the OP considered turning off the clamav milter, and retesting?
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 19:38 +0600, Meshbah Uddin Ahmed wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix as mta and dovecot for pop in debian box. we are
> experiencing duplicate mail receiving problem on some accounts. during
> that time, if we run mailq we found the following output (e.g our xyz
> user)
>
>
Noel Jones skrev 2010-03-22 15:05:
On 3/22/2010 2:36 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Hi,
I'm a relay for a lot of domains and currently I think my server
processes every email that it gets, check if its spam or not, and then
try to relay it to the destination server and if the user doesn't exist,
th
* Wietse Venema :
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > * Wietse Venema :
> >
> > > See DEBUG_README for instructions to attach a non-interactive debugger.
> > >
> > > The only change in the SMTP client is the smtp_address_preference and
> > > lmtp_address_prefere
* Wietse Venema :
> I guess the fix would be:
>
> *** ./smtp.c- Sat Mar 6 19:49:18 2010
> --- ./smtp.cMon Mar 22 10:14:55 2010
> ***
> *** 864,870
> state->request = request;
> state->src = request->fp;
> state->service = service;
> ! state->misc_flag
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > See DEBUG_README for instructions to attach a non-interactive debugger.
> >
> > The only change in the SMTP client is the smtp_address_preference and
> > lmtp_address_preference parameters, which were tested
On 3/22/2010 2:36 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Hi,
I'm a relay for a lot of domains and currently I think my server
processes every email that it gets, check if its spam or not, and then
try to relay it to the destination server and if the user doesn't exist,
the destination SMTP-servers says some
* Wietse Venema :
> Stefan Foerster:
> See DEBUG_README for instructions to attach a non-interactive debugger.
>
> The only change in the SMTP client is the smtp_address_preference and
> lmtp_address_preference parameters, which were tested only for SMTP.
Unfortunately, even after rebuilding my D
On 3/22/2010 8:03 AM, postfix users wrote:
Dear Noel,
Thanks for your reply.
Does it mean on my new Exchange 2010 server, I need to add
"@new.example.com" email address for each recipient?
For example, If I send email to p...@example.com.
The smtp_generic_maps included in the example confi
* Wietse Venema :
> See DEBUG_README for instructions to attach a non-interactive debugger.
>
> The only change in the SMTP client is the smtp_address_preference and
> lmtp_address_preference parameters, which were tested only for SMTP.
I was able to reproduce that on my installation with Stefan
Hi,
I am using postfix as mta and dovecot for pop in debian box. we are
experiencing duplicate mail receiving problem on some accounts. during that
time, if we run *mailq* we found the following output (e.g our xyz user)
cannot update mailbox /var/mail/xyz. for user xyz. unable to lock for
exclus
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Your new firewall is the culprit; it's obstructing STARTTLS. See archives
> (this was recently discussed) for more.
Yes it is. I just replaced my PIX this weekend for a newer Cisco
product (ASA) and I disabled esmtp fixup. Worked like a char
Stefan Foerster:
> This morning, I upgraded from 2.8-20100213 to 2.8-20100306 and enabled
> IPv6 I have always used the lmtp(8) client to feed messages to
> amavisd-new (well, those that picked up by pickup(8), anyways):
>
> pickupfifo n - - 60 1 pickup
>-o co
Dear Noel,
Thanks for your reply.
Does it mean on my new Exchange 2010 server, I need to add
"@new.example.com" email address for each recipient?
For example, If I send email to p...@example.com.
After postfix process, it rewrite the email address
p...@new.example.com and delivery to our new
* Stefan Foerster :
> This morning, I upgraded from 2.8-20100213 to 2.8-20100306 and enabled
> IPv6. I have always used the lmtp(8) client to feed messages to
Follow-up to myself: This happens without inet_protocols=ipv4, too.
Stefan
> amavisd-new (well, those that picked up by pickup(8), anywa
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:23 +0100, Matias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so
> that I can access the greylist database from more than one server.
>
> I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc...
>
I use sqlgrey on CentOS 5.4 with postfix
This morning, I upgraded from 2.8-20100213 to 2.8-20100306 and enabled
IPv6 I have always used the lmtp(8) client to feed messages to
amavisd-new (well, those that picked up by pickup(8), anyways):
pickupfifo n - - 60 1 pickup
-o content_filter=lmtp-amavis:[127
Hi,
>250-mail.iamghost.com
>250-PIPELINING
>250-SIZE 1024
>250-VRFY
>250-ETRN
>250-XXXA
>250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
>250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN
>250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>250-8BITMIME
>250 DSN
My guess is that you have a PIX with smtp fixup enabled.
D.
On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Carlos Mennens
wrote:
I noticed that I am no longer able to send email via Postfix with
STARTTLS enabled on my server. I have not changed anything on my
Postfix server over the weekend. I only changed my Firewall appliance
but everything appears to be in order. I
* Carlos Mennens :
> I noticed that I am no longer able to send email via Postfix with
> STARTTLS enabled on my server. I have not changed anything on my
> Postfix server over the weekend. I only changed my Firewall appliance
> but everything appears to be in order. I don't understand why Postfix
>
I noticed that I am no longer able to send email via Postfix with
STARTTLS enabled on my server. I have not changed anything on my
Postfix server over the weekend. I only changed my Firewall appliance
but everything appears to be in order. I don't understand why Postfix
can't send emails any more v
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:17:42 -0300
Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic
> when i used it.
I use gld on a dedicated server.
It scales very well :-)
Never had a problem either...
luciano.
--
/"\ /Via A. Salaino,
Hello!
I have few email servers that send only email notifications to our customers
with "Return-Path:" and "From:" none@.
If email message cannot be delivered to customer, it must be silently
discarded without non-delivery report to sender.
Is the a way to completely disable Postfix Mail Del
Hello Leonardo,
I use sqlgrey on several slack machines form more than 3 years and I'm totally
satisfied.
Give it a try. It worth.
Monday, March 22, 2010, 1:17:42 PM, you wrote:
> gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic
> when i used it.
> i switched to poli
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Pruniaux Ghislain > wrote:
My question is , is there a way to tell postfix that when login
account
first letter is (a-l) then route mail on account1 and when first
letter
is (m-z) then route mail on account2 ? without using aliases ?
Yes: transport_maps.
Zitat von Matias :
Hi,
I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service,
so that I can access the greylist database from more than one server.
I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc...
Can you recommend any of these?
You can easily access postgrey from more than
gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic
when i used it.
i switched to policyd and never had problems it's MySQL based
and can implement greylist and some other features.
i'm still using policyd v1, i didnt migrated to v2 yet. Anyway,
V1.82 can handl
Wietse Venema:
> Dave Green:
> > > Can you do some tests with a recent version of Postfix's own stress
> > > testing tool?
> >
> > smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10 206.125.173.103
> > 0m42.62s real0m0.02s user0m0.31s system
> >
> > smtp-source -t bitbuc...@
Hi,
We use postfix as a frontal MTA .
Frontal MTA mail are surname.n...@domain.fr , and store account are
sn...@account.fr.
For the moment we only have one mail account server and with aliases we
route mail like this: surname.n...@domain.fr:sn...@account.fr)
We want to create 2 server to store
Hi,
I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so
that I can access the greylist database from more than one server.
I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc...
Can you recommend any of these?
Which one are you using?
Thanks!
Am 22.03.2010 09:49, schrieb Patrick Chemla:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to relay messages to specific MX servers according to
> sender domain, not recipient domain.
>
> I saw the primitive sender_dependent_relayhost_maps but I don't know how
> to use it.
>
> Should I create a list and postmap it and
Hi,
I would like to relay messages to specific MX servers according to
sender domain, not recipient domain.
I saw the primitive sender_dependent_relayhost_maps but I don't know how
to use it.
Should I create a list and postmap it and set a line in my main.cf like :
sender_dependent_relayho
Am 22.03.2010 03:05, schrieb Security Admin (NetSec):
>
> running 2.7.0
>
> I have not changed anything in "main.cf" or "master.cf"
>
> Getting following error in /var/log/maillog
>
> Mar 21 19:00:18 x postfix/smtpd[8118]: fatal: invalid "-o content_filter"
> option value: missing '=' afte
Hi,
I'm a relay for a lot of domains and currently I think my server
processes every email that it gets, check if its spam or not, and then
try to relay it to the destination server and if the user doesn't exist,
the destination SMTP-servers says something like: User Unknown. But is
it possib
53 matches
Mail list logo
