Mauro Faccenda a écrit : > Hi Reinaldo, > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho > <reinal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda <facce...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could >>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the >>> message in SMTP. I think it's nice to not generate bouncing >>> messages/backscatter. But if someone have an alternative besides that, >>> it's always welcome. >>> >>> >> 1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/ > > I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a > line for each mailbox in the database and that's inviable for my > setup. > > Also I droped the use of the VDA patches, since it implements > everything in Postfix's LDA and I am actually using the Dovecot's > (deliver).
well, if you use dovecot, then forget about vda and the like. if you really need quota, then dovecot-sieve has quota support. if you're not happy (now you no longer play the game?), then report what's not good enough. (PS. the "now yo no longer..." thing is of course John Lennon's "Watching the wheels"). > >> 2. Write a policyd to check the quota and reject the message. > > Can you recommend me any documentation/tips for doing it? > This is harder than it looks. do you really need to worry about all this stuff or are you inventing problems?
