Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss: > Mauro Faccenda a écrit : >> Hi Reinaldo, >> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho >> <reinal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda <facce...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could >>>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the >>>> message in SMTP. I think it's nice to not generate bouncing >>>> messages/backscatter. But if someone have an alternative besides that, >>>> it's always welcome. >>>> >>>> >>> 1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/ >> >> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a >> line for each mailbox in the database and that's inviable for my >> setup. >> >> Also I droped the use of the VDA patches, since it implements >> everything in Postfix's LDA and I am actually using the Dovecot's >> (deliver). > > well, if you use dovecot, then forget about vda and the like. > > if you really need quota, then dovecot-sieve has quota support. if > you're not happy (now you no longer play the game?), then report what's > not good enough.
overquota dovecot is not done at smtp income stage a overquta bounce of deliver might get backscatter > > (PS. the "now yo no longer..." thing is of course John Lennon's > "Watching the wheels"). > >> >>> 2. Write a policyd to check the quota and reject the message. >> >> Can you recommend me any documentation/tips for doing it? >> > > This is harder than it looks. do you really need to worry about all this > stuff or are you inventing problems? -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
